Cited by 1,350Technology Adoption and User BehaviourOnline and Blended LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study

Open access
Al-Fraihat, Dimah, Joy, Mike, Masa'deh, Ra'ed, Sinclair, Jane·2020·Computers in Human Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Almarashdeh, I. A., Sahari, N., Zin, N. A. M., and Alsmadi, M. (2010). The success of learning management system among distance learners in malaysian universities. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 21(2).
  2. Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2(4), 169-187.
  3. Fathema, N., & Sutton, K. L. (2013). Factors influencing faculty members' Learning Management Systems adoption behaviour: An analysis using the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Trends in Economics Management & Technology, 2(6).
  4. Goodhue, D. (1986). IS attitudes: Towards theoretical definition and measurement clarity. In L. Maggi, R. Zmudand J. Wetherbe (Eds), Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, San Diego, Calif, 181-194.
  5. Hsieh, J. J. P., & Wang, W. (2007). Explaining employee's extended use of complex information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 216-227.
  6. Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., and Hsu, C. N. (2011). Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: Supporting employees' intentions to use e-learning systems. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 14(4).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Al-Fraihat, Dimah
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
102
Pages
67-86
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2968091587
Cited by
1,350
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 183 · 2025: 191 · 2024: 215 · 2023: 279 · 2022: 221 · 2021: 184 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
142.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • UK
  • University of Warwick
  • LMS
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
e-learning systems, e-learning success, perceived usefulness, perceived satisfaction, information quality, instructor quality, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review