Cited by 8Animal and Plant Science EducationConservation, Ecology, Wildlife EducationWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Elephant Conservation: Reviewing the Need and Potential Impact of Cognition-based Education

Open access
Makecha, Radhika N., Ghosal, Ratna·2017·International Journal of Comparative Psychology

Abstract

Conservation education programs centered on animal cognition seem to be effective in bringing humans closer to non-human species and thereby, influencing their conservation attitudes. Systematic evaluation of the impact of cognition-based education programs on the attitudes of participants has revealed positive feedback and an appreciation towards the species of interest. However, such evaluations are rare for species like elephants, who suffer severe conservation challenges such as high degrees of conflict with the local community. In this paper, we review the need for cognition-based education programs in elephant conservation as well as the need to evaluate these programs to assess their impact on conservation attitudes. In particular, we emphasize the need for such programs in the native ranges of elephants, which are more prone to human-elephant conflict, and argue that exposure to such programs may potentially increase the collaboration of the local community towards conservation efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46867/ijcp.2017.30.00.06

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Fernando, P., Kumar, M. A., Williams, A. C., Wikramanayake, E., Aziz, T., & Singh, S. M. (2008). Review of human- elephant conflict mitigation measures practiced in south Asia. AREAS technical support document submitted to World Bank. WWF -World Wildlife Fund for Nature.
  2. Highfill, L., Fad, O., Makecha, R., & Kuczaj, S. (2013). Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) may demonstrate stable personalities. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 26, 223 -240.
  3. Kuhar, C. W., Bettinger, T. L., Lehnhardt, K., Townsend, S., & Cox, D. (2007). Evaluating the impact of a conservation education program in the Kalinzu Forest Reserve, Uganda. IZE Journal, 43, 12-15.
  4. Kwamboka, V. A. (2013). Living in harmony with elephants. International Zoo Educators Journal, 49, 43-46.
  5. Nelson, A., Bidwell, P., & Sillero-Zubiri, C. (2003). A review of human elephant conflict management strategies. People and Wildlife Initiative. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Oxford University.
  6. Sukumar, R. (2006). A brief review of the status, distribution and biology of wild Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). International Zoo Yearbook, 40, 1-8.
  7. Swanagan, J. S. (2000). Factors influencing zoo visitors' conservation attitude and behavior. Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 26-31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Makecha, R. N., & Ghosal, R.
Affiliations
  • Eastern Kentucky University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Makecha, Radhika N.
Venue
International Journal of Comparative Psychology
Published
2017
Volume
30
ISSN
  • 0889-3667 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-3344
OpenAlex
W2751108648
Cited by
8
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Comparative Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
elephant conservation, animal cognition, conservation education, conservation attitudes, human-elephant conflict, community participation, program evaluation, human-wildlife conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review