Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,688

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy

Open access
Krewski, Daniel, Acosta, Daniel, Andersen, Melvin, Anderson, Henry, Bailar, John C., Boekelheide, Kim, Brent, Robert, Charnley, Gail, Cheung, Vivian G., Green, Sidney, Kelsey, Karl T., Kerkvliet, Nancy I., Li, Abby A., McCray, Lawrence, Meyer, Otto, Patterson, Reid D., Pennie, William, Scala, Robert A., Solomon, Gina M., Stephens, Martin, Yager, James, Zeise, Lauren, Staff of Committee on Toxicity Testing and Assessment of Env·2010·Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B

Abstract

With the release of the landmark report Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, in 2007, precipitated a major change in the way toxicity testing is conducted. It envisions increased efficiency in toxicity testing and decreased animal usage by transitioning from current expensive and lengthy in vivo testing with qualitative endpoints to in vitro toxicity pathway assays on human cells or cell lines using robotic high-throughput screening with mechanistic quantitative parameters. Risk assessment in the exposed human population would focus on avoiding significant perturbations in these toxicity pathways. Computational systems biology models would be implemented to determine the dose-response models of perturbations of pathway function. Extrapolation of in vitro results to in vivo human blood and tissue concentrations would be based on pharmacokinetic models for the given exposure condition. This practice would enhance human relevance of test results, and would cover several test agents, compared to traditional toxicological testing strategies. As all the tools that are necessary to implement the vision are currently available or in an advanced stage of development, the key prerequisites to achieving this paradigm shift are a commitment to change in the scientific community, which could be facilitated by a broad discussion of the vision, and obtaining necessary resources to enhance current knowledge of pathway perturbations and pathway assays in humans and to implement computational systems biology models. Implementation of these strategies would result in a new toxicity testing paradigm firmly based on human biology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10937404.2010.483176

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 1,688

Metadata

Authors
Krewski, D., Acosta, D., Andersen, M., Anderson, H., Bailar, J. C., Boekelheide, K., Brent, R., Charnley, G., Cheung, V. G., Green, S., Kelsey, K. T., Kerkvliet, N. I., Li, A. A., McCray, L., Meyer, O., Patterson, R. D., Pennie, W., Scala, R. A., Solomon, G. M., Stephens, M., Yager, J., Zeise, L., & Staff of Committee on Toxicity Testing and Assessment of Env
Venue
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B
Published
2010-06-17
Volume
13
Issue
2-4
Pages
51-138
ISSN
  • 1093-7404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-6950
OpenAlex
W2041473955
Cited by
1,688
References
9
FWCI
166.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10937404.2010.483176
The paper
Krewski, D., Acosta, D., Andersen, M., Anderson, H., Bailar, J. C., Boekelheide, K., Brent, R., Charnley, G., Cheung, V. G., Green, S., Kelsey, K. T., Kerkvliet, N. I., Li, A. A., McCray, L., Meyer, O., Patterson, R. D., Pennie, W., Scala, R. A., Solomon, G. M., . . . Staff of Committee on Toxicity Testing and Assessment of Env. (2010). Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2010.483176

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.