The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy
Open accessAbstract
With the release of the landmark report Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, in 2007, precipitated a major change in the way toxicity testing is conducted. It envisions increased efficiency in toxicity testing and decreased animal usage by transitioning from current expensive and lengthy in vivo testing with qualitative endpoints to in vitro toxicity pathway assays on human cells or cell lines using robotic high-throughput screening with mechanistic quantitative parameters. Risk assessment in the exposed human population would focus on avoiding significant perturbations in these toxicity pathways. Computational systems biology models would be implemented to determine the dose-response models of perturbations of pathway function. Extrapolation of in vitro results to in vivo human blood and tissue concentrations would be based on pharmacokinetic models for the given exposure condition. This practice would enhance human relevance of test results, and would cover several test agents, compared to traditional toxicological testing strategies. As all the tools that are necessary to implement the vision are currently available or in an advanced stage of development, the key prerequisites to achieving this paradigm shift are a commitment to change in the scientific community, which could be facilitated by a broad discussion of the vision, and obtaining necessary resources to enhance current knowledge of pathway perturbations and pathway assays in humans and to implement computational systems biology models. Implementation of these strategies would result in a new toxicity testing paradigm firmly based on human biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization
Barabási, A.-L., & Oltvai, Z. N. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1272 · Cited by 7,903
Kobayashi, A., Kang, M.-I., Okawa, H., Ohtsuji, M., Zenke, Y., Chiba, T., Igarashi, K., & Yamamoto, M. (2004) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.24.16.7130-7139.2004 · Cited by 2,224
Nrf2–Keap1 defines a physiologically important stress response mechanism
Motohashi, H., & Yamamoto, M. (2004) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2004.09.003 · Cited by 1,725
Ho, S.-M., Tang, W.-Y., Belmonte de Frausto, J., & Prins, G. S. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0516 · Cited by 796
Physicochemical modelling of cell signalling pathways
Aldridge, B. B., Burke, J. M., Lauffenburger, D. A., & Sorger, P. K. (2006) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1497 · Cited by 592
Dicing and slicing: The core machinery of the RNA interference pathway
Hammond, S. M. (2005) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.08.079 · Cited by 545
Xiao, G. G., Wang, M., Li, N., Loo, J. A., & Nel, A. E. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m306423200 · Cited by 428
Nuclear receptors: integration of multiple signalling pathways through phosphorylation
Rochette-Egly, C. (2003) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/s0898-6568(02)00115-8 · Cited by 291
International alliances for quantitative modeling in systems biology
Kitano, H. (2005) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100011 · Cited by 38
Cited by
Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity
Grandjean, P., & Landrigan, P. J. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70278-3 · Cited by 1,886
DeepTox: toxicity prediction using deep learning
Mayr, A., Klambauer, G., Unterthiner, T., & Hochreiter, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2015.00080 · Cited by 1,081
Advancing drug discovery via artificial intelligence
Chan, H. C. S., Shan, H., Dahoun, T., Vogel, H., & Yuan, S. (2019) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2019.06.004 · Cited by 654
OPERA models for predicting physicochemical properties and environmental fate endpoints
Mansouri, K., Grulke, C. M., Judson, R. S., & Williams, A. J. (2018) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-018-0263-1 · Cited by 624
Judson, R. S., Houck, K. A., Kavlock, R. J., Knudsen, T. B., Martin, M. T., Mortensen, H. M., Reif, D. M., Rotroff, D. M., Shah, I., Richard, A. M., et al. (2010) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.0901392 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Krewski, D., Acosta, D., Andersen, M., Anderson, H., Bailar, J. C., Boekelheide, K., Brent, R., Charnley, G., Cheung, V. G., Green, S., Kelsey, K. T., Kerkvliet, N. I., Li, A. A., McCray, L., Meyer, O., Patterson, R. D., Pennie, W., Scala, R. A., Solomon, G. M., Stephens, M., Yager, J., Zeise, L., & Staff of Committee on Toxicity Testing and Assessment of Env
- Venue
- Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-06-17
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2-4
- Pages
- 51-138
- ISSN
- 1093-7404 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-6950
- OpenAlex
- W2041473955
- Cited by
- 1,688
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 166.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10937404.2010.483176
- The paper
- Krewski, D., Acosta, D., Andersen, M., Anderson, H., Bailar, J. C., Boekelheide, K., Brent, R., Charnley, G., Cheung, V. G., Green, S., Kelsey, K. T., Kerkvliet, N. I., Li, A. A., McCray, L., Meyer, O., Patterson, R. D., Pennie, W., Scala, R. A., Solomon, G. M., . . . Staff of Committee on Toxicity Testing and Assessment of Env. (2010). Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2010.483176
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.