Cited by 41Coconut Research and ApplicationsFood and Agricultural SciencesFood Science and Nutritional Studies

Ergogenic Attributes of Young and Mature Coconut ( Cocos nucifera L.) Water Based on Physical Properties, Sugars and Electrolytes Contents

Open access
Halim, Hani Hafeeza, Williams Dee, Elfy, Pak Dek, Mohd Sabri, Hamid, Azizah Abdul, Ngalim, Ahmad, Saari, Nazamid, Jaafar, Ahmad Haniff·2018·International Journal of Food Properties

Abstract

The present work aimed to compare the main ergogenic attributes of two commercialized stages (young and mature) of coconut water (CW) obtained from four coconut varieties. The changes of electrolytes and sugars in CW upon maturation were quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrophotometer and high-performance liquid chromatography, respectively. Based on the electrolyte profiling, potassium yielded the highest amount (ranging from 237.41 to 361.20 mg/100 mL) followed by sodium, magnesium, calcium, iron, manganese, copper, selenium, and zinc across all the maturity stages tested. For sugars, there were lower amounts of fructose and glucose, but a higher amount of sucrose with the maturation of the fruits. In conclusion, the amount of beneficial nutrients in the form of sugars and minerals was higher than that of young CW, and the ergogenic attributes of mature CW especially from MATAG variety (M-MATAG) were the best to be exploited further in the development of natural energy drinks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10942912.2018.1522329

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halim, H. H., Williams Dee, E., Pak Dek, M. S., Hamid, A. A., Ngalim, A., Saari, N., & Jaafar, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
  • Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia
  • Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MY)
Corresponding author
Jaafar, Ahmad Haniff
Venue
International Journal of Food Properties
Published
2018-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
2378-2389
ISSN
  • 1094-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2386
OpenAlex
W2893940568
Cited by
41
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Food Properties (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Universiti Putra Malaysia (IPS-9518300)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food Science and Nutritional Studies
Keywords
coconut water, Cocos nucifera, fruit maturity, electrolytes, mineral content, sugar, sucrose, fructose, glucose, potassium, energy drinks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review