Cited by 50Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

A Randomized, Controlled Comparison of Educational and Behavioural Interventions for Women with Fibromyalgia

Soares, Joaquim J. F., Grossi, Giorgio·2002·Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/110381202753505845

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soares, J. J. F., & Grossi, G.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2002-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
35-45
ISSN
  • 1103-8128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2014
OpenAlex
W2158305483
Cited by
50
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
fibromyalgia, women, educational intervention, behavioral interventions, pain coping, functional disability, pain perception, sleep quality, waitlist control, treatment follow-up, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Coping Strategies Questionnaire

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review