Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: lessons from research in zoos and aquariums
Abstract
Zoos and aquariums have shifted their focus over recent years, taking a much more active role in wildlife conservation and in promoting conservation learning among their visitors. Research in these settings provides a valuable foundation for the emerging field of non‐captive wildlife tourism. In particular, valuable lessons regarding the potential impact of wildlife encounters on visitors’ conservation attitudes and behaviour can be drawn from research in zoos and aquariums. This paper explores those aspects of wildlife encounters that appear to contribute most to conservation learning. These include observing animals in their ‘natural’ environment; opportunities for close encounters with wildlife; opportunities to observe animal behaviour; engaging visitors emotionally; connecting with visitors’ prior knowledge and experiences; using persuasive communication; linking conservation goals and everyday actions; and providing incentives and activities to support visitors’ behaviour change. The extent to which wildlife tourists may be receptive to conservation messages is also considered, in light of research in zoos and aquariums. The implications of these findings for conservation learning in the context of non‐captive wildlife tourism are discussed and suggestions for future research in this area are made. Several methodological challenges facing the field are also discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People were more committed to wildlife conservation after exposure to ambassador programs.
“In a review of studies investigating the effects of zoo-wildlife encounters on visitors, Ballantyne and colleagues [1] found that people were more committed to wildlife conservation after exposure to ambassador programs, presumably mediated by an emotional response to close interaction with the program animals (not necessarily including physical contact).”
From Evaluating the Behavior and Temperament of African Penguins in a Non-Contact Animal Encounter Program (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
A positive visitor experience as a result of viewing animals engaged in natural, active behaviours has been shown to facilitate learning in zoos.
“Conversely, a positive visitor experience as a result of viewing animals engaged in natural, active behaviours has been shown to facilitate learning in zoos [41,43].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
Visitors are key to delivering many zoo-based conservation goals as the targets of many social conservation education and advocacy campaigns designed to mitigate human-driven threats to wildlife.
“This is because visitors are key to delivering many zoo-based conservation goals as the targets of many social conservation education and advocacy campaigns designed to mitigate human-driven threats to wildlife [41].”
From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare
Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060366 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
“This is because visitors are key to delivering many zoo-based conservation goals as the targets of many social conservation education and advocacy campaigns designed to mitigate human-driven threats to wildlife [41].”
BackgroundAn animal welfare risk assessment process for zoos
Sherwen, S. L., Hemsworth, L. M., Beausoleil, N. J., Embury, A., & Mellor, D. J. (2018) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani8080130 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Advances in Applied Zoo Animal Welfare Science
Ward, S. J., Sherwen, S., & Clark, F. E. (2018) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1080/10888705.2018.1513842 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Ideal animals and animal traits for zoos: General public perspectives
Carr, N. (2016) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.05.013 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Saiyed, S. T., Hopper, L. M., & Cronin, K. A. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060326 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Elephant Conservation: Reviewing the Need and Potential Impact of Cognition-based Education
Makecha, R. N., & Ghosal, R. (2017) · International Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.46867/ijcp.2017.30.00.06 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Dierking, L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Institute for Learning Innovation (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ballantyne, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Education Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-383
- ISSN
- 1350-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5871
- OpenAlex
- W2083319710
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 12.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Education Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Keywords
- zoos, aquariums, wildlife encounters, conservation attitudes, environmental behavior change, persuasive communication, emotional engagement, conservation messaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review