Cited by 406Animal and Plant Science EducationMuseums and Cultural HeritageConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: lessons from research in zoos and aquariums

Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., Dierking, L.·2007·Environmental Education Research

Abstract

Zoos and aquariums have shifted their focus over recent years, taking a much more active role in wildlife conservation and in promoting conservation learning among their visitors. Research in these settings provides a valuable foundation for the emerging field of non‐captive wildlife tourism. In particular, valuable lessons regarding the potential impact of wildlife encounters on visitors’ conservation attitudes and behaviour can be drawn from research in zoos and aquariums. This paper explores those aspects of wildlife encounters that appear to contribute most to conservation learning. These include observing animals in their ‘natural’ environment; opportunities for close encounters with wildlife; opportunities to observe animal behaviour; engaging visitors emotionally; connecting with visitors’ prior knowledge and experiences; using persuasive communication; linking conservation goals and everyday actions; and providing incentives and activities to support visitors’ behaviour change. The extent to which wildlife tourists may be receptive to conservation messages is also considered, in light of research in zoos and aquariums. The implications of these findings for conservation learning in the context of non‐captive wildlife tourism are discussed and suggestions for future research in this area are made. Several methodological challenges facing the field are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13504620701430604

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People were more committed to wildlife conservation after exposure to ambassador programs.

    “In a review of studies investigating the effects of zoo-wildlife encounters on visitors, Ballantyne and colleagues [1] found that people were more committed to wildlife conservation after exposure to ambassador programs, presumably mediated by an emotional response to close interaction with the program animals (not necessarily including physical contact).”
  • A positive visitor experience as a result of viewing animals engaged in natural, active behaviours has been shown to facilitate learning in zoos.

    “Conversely, a positive visitor experience as a result of viewing animals engaged in natural, active behaviours has been shown to facilitate learning in zoos [41,43].”
  • Visitors are key to delivering many zoo-based conservation goals as the targets of many social conservation education and advocacy campaigns designed to mitigate human-driven threats to wildlife.

    “This is because visitors are key to delivering many zoo-based conservation goals as the targets of many social conservation education and advocacy campaigns designed to mitigate human-driven threats to wildlife [41].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Dierking, L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Institute for Learning Innovation (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Ballantyne, R.
Venue
Environmental Education Research
Published
2007-07
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
367-383
ISSN
  • 1350-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5871
OpenAlex
W2083319710
Cited by
406
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 24
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Education Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
zoos, aquariums, wildlife encounters, conservation attitudes, environmental behavior change, persuasive communication, emotional engagement, conservation messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review