The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time course of information processing during scene perception: The relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration
Abstract
The present study focuses on two aspects of the time course of visual information processing during the perception of natural scenes. The first aspect is the change of fixation duration and saccade amplitude during the first couple of seconds of the inspection period, as has been described by Buswell (Citation1935), among others. This common effect suggests that the saccade amplitude and fixation duration are in some way controlled by the same mechanism. A simple exponential model containing two parameters can describe the phenomena quite satisfactorily. The parameters of the model show that saccade amplitude and fixation duration may be controlled by a common mechanism. The second aspect under scrutiny is the apparent lack of correlation between saccade amplitude and fixation duration (Viviani, Citation1990). The present study shows that a strong but nonlinear relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration does exist in picture viewing. A model, based on notions laid out by Findlay and Walker's (Citation1999) model of saccade generation and on the idea of two modes of visual processing (Trevarthen, Citation1968), was developed to explain this relationship. The model both fits the data quite accurately and can explain a number of related phenomena.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of attention in the programming of saccades
Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E. (1995) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00279-u · Cited by 1,302
Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements
Carpenter, R. H. S., & Williams, M. L. L. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377059a0 · Cited by 823
Norman, J. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0200002x · Cited by 466
Cited by
The development of face orienting mechanisms in infants at-risk for autism
Elsabbagh, M., Gliga, T., Pickles, A., Hudry, K., Charman, T., & Johnson, M. H. (2013) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2012.07.030 · Cited by 257
Cornelissen, T. H. W., & Võ, M. L.-H. (2017) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1203-7 · Cited by 70
Abbas, A. N., Amazu, C. W., Mietkiewicz, J., Briwa, H., Perez, A. A., Baldissone, G., Demichela, M., Chasparis, G. C., Kelleher, J. D., & Leva, M. C. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2391605 · Cited by 34
Balzarotti, S., Cavaletti, F., D'Aloia, A., Colombo, B., Cardani, E., Ciceri, M. R., Antonietti, A., & Eugeni, R. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12969 · Cited by 13
The dynamic effects of visual complexity and scene cuts on viewer attention
Wals, S., Grewal, D., Wilms, I., Hilken, T., Briassouli, A., & Wetzels, M. (2026) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-025-01137-x · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Unema, P. J. A., Pannasch, S., Joos, M., & Velichkovsky, B. M.
- Venue
- Visual Cognition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 473-494
- ISSN
- 1350-6285 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0716
- OpenAlex
- W2033198735
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.