The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pedagogical reasoning: the foundation of the professional knowledge of teaching
Abstract
Much of the debate about that which comprises teachers’ professional knowledge has been important in the academic literature but does not necessarily reflect the reality of how they think as they construct the knowledge that underpins their practice. Typically, teachers are not encouraged to spend time talking about teaching in ways that are theoretically robust, or to unpack their teaching in order to show others what they know, how and why. Because they are busy ‘doing teaching’ they are not commonly afforded opportunities to ‘unpack’ their practice to explore and articulate the reasoning underpinning what they do. This paper argues that the essence of teachers’ professional knowledge is bound up in the teaching procedures they employ and that knowledge is accessible and demonstrable through the pedagogical reasoning that underpins their decision-making, actions and intents; all of which come to the fore when their pedagogical reasoning is examined. If teaching is to be more highly valued, it is important to more closely examine the nature of teachers’ pedagogical reasoning as it offers a window into the complex and sophisticated knowledge of practice that influences what they do, how and why.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Loughran suggested that pedagogic reasoning is the thinking that underpins informed professional practice.
“Loughran (2019, p. 526) suggested that pedagogic reasoning is the “thinking that underpins informed professional practice.””
From Conceptualising work-integrated learning to support pre-service teachers' pedagogic reasoning (2021) · cites this paper as Loughran, 2019
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher Learning in Communities
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.2307/1167272 · Cited by 2,288
Inquiry as stance: practitioner research for the next generation
Mockler, N. (2010) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2010.525018 · Cited by 1,664
Linking Theory and Practice: Changing the Pedagogy of Teacher Education
Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x028004004 · Cited by 1,266
Teachers as Self-directed Learners
Smith, K. (2017) · Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3587-6 · Cited by 35
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 10.1039/C4RP00125G · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1020878121184 · DOI
- Baird J. R., 1986, Improving the quality of teaching and learning: An Australian case study - The PEEL project
- Baird J. R., 1992, Learning from the PEEL experience
- Barnes D., 1976, From communication to curriculum
- 10.1080/0013188950370105 · DOI
- 10.3102/0013189X015007007 · DOI
- Berry A., 2008, International Journal of Science Education, 30, 10.1080/09500690801998885 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0742-051X(91)90045-Q · DOI
- Clandinin D. J., 1995, Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes
- Clandinin D. J., 1996, Educational Researcher, 25, 24
- Cochran-Smith M., 2004, International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices, 1, 601
- Cooper R., 2015, Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education, 70
- 10.1108/S1479-3687(2013)19 · DOI
- Darling-Hammond L., 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do
- Day C., 1993, Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development
- Day C., 2007, Teachers matter: Connecting lives, work and effectiveness
- Dewey J., 1904, The relation of theory to practice in the education of teachers (Third Yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education, Part 1), 9
- Dewey J., 1930, The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action
- 10.1037/10903-000 · DOI
- DuFour R., 2010, 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn, 77
- 10.2307/1167381 · DOI
- Freire P., 1972, Pedagogy of the oppressed
- Friesen S., 2015, Focus on inquiry
- Gess-Newsome J., 1999, Examining pedagogical content knowledge, 3
- 10.1007/s11165-010-9168-3 · DOI
- 10.5617/nordina.964 · DOI
- Kessels J., 2001, Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education, 20
- 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2007.00304.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eq.2015.09.004 · DOI
- Loughran J., 1996, Opening the classroom door: Teacher, researcher, learner
- Loughran J. J., 2010, What expert teachers do: Teachers’ professional knowledge of classroom practice. Sydney
- Loughran J. J., 2006, Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge, 10.1163/9789087903657 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-981-10-0366-0_10 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.20007 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780429053573 · DOI
- 10.1080/17425964.2018.1541274 · DOI
- Mitchell I. J., 2002, Learning from teacher research, 249
- Mitchell I. J., 2007, Teaching for effective learning: The complete book of PEEL teaching procedures
- 10.1080/13540602.2016.1218328 · DOI
- 10.17763/haer.74.3.e08k1276713824u5 · DOI
- 10.2307/358975 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-X · DOI
- 10.1080/09500690802187025 · DOI
- Salter K. L., 2016, BMC Medical Education, 16, 1
- Schneider R. M., 2015, Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education, 162
- Schön D. A., 1983, The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
- 10.1080/0022027910230501 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Stoll L., 2007, Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas
- Timperley H., 2011, Realizing the power of professional learning
- Tobin K., 1999, Examining pedagogical content knowledge, 215
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
- Zhang X. J., 2014, Studies in Foreign Education, 41, 50
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conceptualising work-integrated learning to support pre-service teachers' pedagogic reasoning
RusznyakI, L., & Bertram, C. (2021) · Journal of Education · doi:10.17159/2520-9868/i83a02 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Loughran, J.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Loughran, John
- Venue
- Teachers and Teaching
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-06-19
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 523-535
- ISSN
- 1354-0602 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1278
- OpenAlex
- W2949126359
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 33.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers and Teaching (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- pedagogical reasoning, teacher professional knowledge, knowledge of practice, teaching decision-making, teaching procedures, teacher knowledge construction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review