The Fertility and Women's Labor Force Participation puzzle in OECD Countries: The Role of Men's Home Production
Abstract
One effect of Southern Europe's rapid fertility decline is the emergence of a positive cross-country correlation between women's labor force participation and fertility across developed countries, despite the continuing negative correlation between these factors within countries. This study uses individual-level data for several OECD countries to examine how men's participation in home production can explain the positive relationship between fertility and women's labor force participation at the cross-country level. It finds that women living in countries where men participate more in home production are better able to combine having children with market work, leading to greater participation in the labor force at relatively high fertility levels. Within each country however, women with higher relative wages continue to have lower fertility and to participate more in the labor force than lower-paid women due to the higher opportunity cost of remaining at home. This finding on men's home production can thus explain the positive cross-country correlation between female labor force participation and fertility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher fertility rates are linked to husbands' contributions to domestic work.
“Evidence has been found for links between higher fertility rates and 1) the husband's contributions to domestic work”
From Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea (2017) · cites this paper as De Laat and Sevilla-Sanz 2011
Macro-level studies using OECD data have shown that fertility rates are positively related to men's share of childcare and housework relative to their wives'.
“A number of macro-level studies using data from OECD countries have shown that fertility rates are positively related to men's share of childcare and housework relative to their wives' (Feyrer, Sacerdote, and Stern 2008; De Laat and Sevilla-Sanz 2011).”
From Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea (2017) · cites this paper as De Laat and Sevilla-Sanz 2011
Cites
Will the Stork Return to Europe and Japan? Understanding Fertility within Developed Nations
Feyrer, J., Sacerdote, B., & Stern, A. D. (2008) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.22.3.3 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Will the Stork Return to Europe and Japan? Understanding Fertility within Developed Nations
Feyrer, J., Sacerdote, B., & Stern, A. D. (2008) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.22.3.3 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
The gender division of labor and second births: Labor market institutions and fertility in Japan
Nagase, N., & Brinton, M. C. (2017) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2017.36.11 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
“Though we assume that both husbands and wives can devote time to both household work and market work, we follow de Laat and Sevilla-Sanz (2011) in assuming that men’s disutility to engage in household work depends on the cultural norms of their reference group.”
BackgroundDivision of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea
Kim, E. H.-W. (2017) · Demographic Research · doi:10.4054/demres.2017.37.24 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Fertility in High-Income Countries: Trends, Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences
Bloom, D. E., Kuhn, M., & Prettner, K. (2024) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-081523-013750 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Fertility in High-Income Countries: Trends, Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences
Bloom, D. E., Kuhn, M., & Prettner, K. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4597716 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Laat, J., & Sevilla-Sanz, A.
- Venue
- Feminist Economics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87-119
- ISSN
- 1354-5701 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4372
- OpenAlex
- W2011145664
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 17.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Feminist Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- fertility, women's employment, gender division of labor, cross-country correlation, opportunity cost of childbearing, women's wages, fertility decline, work-family balance, OECD countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review