Cited by 246Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsWork-Family Balance Challenges

Will the Stork Return to Europe and Japan? Understanding Fertility within Developed Nations

Open access
Feyrer, James, Sacerdote, Bruce, Stern, Ariel Dora·2008·Journal of Economic Perspectives

Abstract

We seek to explain the differences in fertility rates across high-income countries by focusing on the interaction between the increasing status of women in the workforce and their status in the household, particularly with regards to child care and home production. We observe three distinct phases in women's status generated by the gradual increase in women's workforce opportunities. In the earliest phase, characteristic of the 1950s and 1960s in the United States, women earn low wages relative to men and are expected to shoulder all of the child care at home. As a result, most women specialize in home production and raising children. In an intermediate stage, women have improved (but not equal) labor market opportunities, but their household status lags. Women in this stage are still expected to do the majority of child care and household production. Increasing access to market work increases the opportunity cost of having children, and fertility falls. Female labor force participation increases. Working women in this phase of development have the strongest disincentives to having additional children since the entire burden of child care falls on them. In the final phase of development, women's labor market opportunities begin to equal those of men. In addition, the increased household bargaining power that comes from more equal wages results in much higher (if not gender-equal) male participation in household production. Female labor force participation is higher than in the intermediate phase. The increased participation of men in the household also reduces the disincentives for women to have additional children, and fertility rates rise compared to the intermediate phase. The intermediate, low-fertility phase might describe Japan, Italy, and Spain in the present day, while the Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands, and the modern-day United States may be entering the final phase. After presenting the empirical evidence, we predict that high-income countries with the lowest fertility rates are likely to see an increase in fertility in the coming decades.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/jep.22.3.3

Cites

37 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher fertility rates are linked to husbands' contributions to domestic work.

    “Evidence has been found for links between higher fertility rates and 1) the husband's contributions to domestic work”

    From Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea (2017) · cites this paper as Feyrer, Sacerdote, and Stern 2008

  • Macro-level studies using OECD data have shown that fertility rates are positively related to men's share of childcare and housework relative to their wives'.

    “A number of macro-level studies using data from OECD countries have shown that fertility rates are positively related to men's share of childcare and housework relative to their wives' (Feyrer, Sacerdote, and Stern 2008; De Laat and Sevilla-Sanz 2011).”

    From Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea (2017) · cites this paper as Feyrer, Sacerdote, and Stern 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Gatenio-Gabel, Shirley, and Sheila B. Kamer- man. 2006. "Investing in Children: Public Com- mitment in Twenty-one Industrialized Coun- tries." Social Service Review, 80(2): 239 -63.
  2. Jisoo Hwang, Seok Ki Kim. 2023. Unexpected longevity, intergenerational policies, and fertility. Journal of Population Economics 36:3, 1607-1640. [Crossref] · DOI
  3. Irina E. Kalabikhina, Sofia M. Rebrey. 2022. Economics of gender: A bibliometric analysis. Russian Journal of Economics 8:3, 295-314. [Crossref] · DOI
  4. Deniz ALÇİN ŞAHİNTÜRK, Ahmet Kemal ÇELEBİ. 2021. DOĞURGANLIK HIZINI ARTTIRMAYA YÖNELİK KAMU MALİ TEŞVİKLERİ: AVUSTRALYA, JAPONYA, DANİMARKA, FRANSA, KANADA VE RUSYA ANALİZİ. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute . [Crossref] · DOI
  5. Akira Okamoto. 2020. Childcare Allowances and Public Pensions: Welfare and Demographic Effects in an Aging Japan. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 20:2. . [Crossref] · DOI
  6. Mizuki Komura, Hikaru Ogawa, Yoshitomo Ogawa. 2019. Optimal income taxation when couples have endogenous bargaining power. Economic Modelling 83, 384-393. [Crossref] · DOI
  7. Rosa Aisa, Joaquín Andaluz, Gemma Larramona. 2017. Fertility patterns in the Roma population of Spain. Review of Economics of the Household 15:1, 115-133. [Crossref] · DOI
  8. Kyounghoon Park. 2017. Causes and Characteristics of Population Aging. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref] · DOI
  9. Alexia Prskawetz. The Role of Social Interactions in Demography: An Agent-Based Modelling Approach 53-72. [Crossref] · DOI
  10. Stephen J. Spurr. 2015. The Market for Lawyers Revisited. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref] · DOI
  11. Vivien Procher, Nolan Ritter, Colin Vance. 2014. Making Dough or Baking Dough? Spousal Housework Responsibilities in Germany, 1992-2011. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref] · DOI
  12. Mizuki Komura. 2013. Tax reform and endogenous gender bargaining power. Review of Economics of the Household 11:2, 175-192. [Crossref] · DOI
  13. Valerio Filoso. 2013. Regression Anatomy, Revealed. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata 13:1, 92-106. [Crossref] · DOI
  14. Jisoo Hwang. 2013. Housewife, 'Gold Miss,' and Equal: The Evolution of Educated Women's Role in Asia and the U.S. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref] · DOI
  15. Peter H. Egger, Doina M. Radulescu. 2012. Family policy and the number of children: Evidence from a natural experiment. European Journal of Political Economy 28:4, 524-539. [Crossref] · DOI
  16. Daniel R. Mishell, Jr, MD, and the journal Contraception. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 17:6, 399-401. [Crossref] · DOI
  17. CREINA DAY, STEVE DOWRICK. 2010. What Entices the Stork? Fertility, Education and Family Payments*. Economic Record 86, 69-79. [Crossref] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feyrer, J., Sacerdote, B., & Stern, A. D.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
3-22
ISSN
0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159577266
Cited by
246
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
28.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Economic Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
Keywords
fertility decline, fertility reversal, women's employment, gender pay gap, household bargaining power, child care, household production, opportunity cost of children, gender division of labor, high-income countries
MeSH terms
Birth Rate, Child, Child Care, Child, Preschool, Employment, Europe, Fathers, Female, Financing, Government, Forecasting, Household Work, Housing, Humans, Income, Japan, Male, Mothers, Public Policy, Role, Socioeconomic Factors, Taxes, Developed Countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review