Cited by 109Land Rights and ReformsUrban and Rural Development ChallengesAfrican studies and sociopolitical issues

Unintended Consequences of Land Rights Reform: The Case of the 1998 Uganda Land Act

Open access
Hunt, Diana·2004·Development Policy Review

Abstract

Empirical studies of land rights privatisation have tended to underemphasise the unintended impacts of land rights reform relative to establishing whether the predicted impacts have occurred. This article, in reviewing some of the unintended consequences of the 1998 Uganda Land Act, draws attention to ways in which intended impacts may be undercut by lack of both consultation and foresight in anticipating responses to new legal provisions and by lack of adequate resourcing of the reform process. It also recognises that unintended outcomes may sometimes reflect appropriate adaptations of legal provisions at the local level, and briefly considers what light the Ugandan experience can throw on recent proposals for Normalisation of informal property rights in the Third World.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2004.00244.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some commentators suggested that the gap of several years between the LSSP's issuance and implementation was costly in terms of loss of momentum and credibility of the new system.

    “Some commentators have suggested that the gap of several years between the LSSP's issuance and implementation was costly in terms of loss of momentum and credibility of the new system (McAuslan 2003;Hunt 2004).”

Authors
Hunt, D.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Hunt, Diana
Venue
Development Policy Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-16
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
173-191
ISSN
  • 0950-6764 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7679
OpenAlex
W1995811384
Cited by
109
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development Policy Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
Keywords
land rights reform, unintended consequences, land privatization, land tenure law, legal advice, informal property rights, land policy implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review