Cited by 130Smoking Behavior and CessationBehavioral Health and InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Understanding adolescent smoking: The role of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and implementation intentions

Higgins, A, Conner, M·2003·Psychology, Health & Medicine

Abstract

This research examined the power of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) to predict smoking intentions and smoking behaviour in a sample of adolescents (N = 162). In addition, the role of past smoking behaviour and an implementation intention intervention was assessed. TPB variables and smoking behaviour was assessed by self-report questionnaires given to children (11 and 12 years old) at the beginning of the study (time 1) and again 8 weeks later (time 2). All children received information against smoking and either formed an implementation intention about how, where and when they could resist smoking, or in the control condition how, where and when they could finish all their work at school. The TPB provided good predictions of intentions cross-sectionally (R2 = 0.27) and prospectively (R2 = 0.23) and behaviour prospectively (91% correctly classified). Past behaviour was only significant in the prospective analyses. Implementation intentions produced modest reductions in smoking and smoking initiation compared to the control group. These differences were not significant. Implementation intentions increased the power of attitudes and decreased the power of perceived behavioural control to predict intentions prospectively. Implications for furthering our understanding of smoking initiation in this group are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1354850031000087555

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higgins and Conner (2003) did not find a primary effect, but only effects involving moderators based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.

    “Armitage and Sprigg (2010) observed an effect of implementation intentions, whereas Higgins and Conner (2003) did not find a primary effect, but only effects involving moderators based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Higgins, A., & Conner, M.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
Psychology, Health & Medicine
Published
2003-05
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
173-186
ISSN
  • 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3966
OpenAlex
W1968209704
Cited by
130
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology Health & Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
adolescent smoking, smoking initiation, theory of planned behavior, implementation intentions, smoking intention, smoking behavior, attitudes, perceived behavioral control, smoking prevention interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review