The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Burnout, engagement and resident physicians' self-reported errors
Open accessAbstract
Burnout is a work-related syndrome that may negatively affect more than just the resident physician. On the other hand, engagement has been shown to protect employees; it may also positively affect the patient care that the residents provide. Little is known about the relationship between residents' self-reported errors and burnout and engagement. In our national study that included all residents and physicians in The Netherlands, 2115 questionnaires were returned (response rate 41.1%). The residents reported on burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory-Health and Social Services), engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale) and self-assessed patient care practices (six items, two factors: errors in action/judgment, errors due to lack of time). Ninety-four percent of the residents reported making one or more mistake without negative consequences for the patient during their training. Seventy-one percent reported performing procedures for which they did not feel properly trained. More than half (56%) of the residents stated they had made a mistake with a negative consequence. Seventy-six percent felt they had fallen short in the quality of care they provided on at least one occasion. Men reported more errors in action/judgment than women. Significant effects of specialty and clinical setting were found on both types of errors. Residents with burnout reported significantly more errors (p < 0.001). Highly engaged residents reported fewer errors (p ≤ 0.01). Overall residents disclosed that in their perception they regularly make errors throughout their residency. Steps should be taken to help residents minimize the number of perceived errors made. Therefore, it is important to prevent residents from developing burnout and to keep residents engaged in their work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, J. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203771587 · Cited by 25,373
The job demands-resources model of burnout.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · Cited by 13,643
Self-citationThe Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710733115 · Cited by 12,996
Self-citationMaslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 · Cited by 12,852
Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.248 · Cited by 9,297
Self-citationBurnout and self-reported patient care in an internal medicine residency program
Shanafelt, T. D., Bradley, K. A., Wipf, J. E., & Back, A. L. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00008 · Cited by 2,165 · cited 2×
“The questions were developed based on questions used in a previous study of errors made by residents (Shanafelt et al., 2002).”
BackgroundMethodWest, C. P., Huschka, M. M., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J. A., Kolars, J. C., Habermann, T. M., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1071 · Cited by 1,454
Thomas, N. K. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.23.2880 · Cited by 750
Do House Officers Learn From Their Mistakes?
Wu, A. W. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03460160067031 · Cited by 565
Medical Errors Involving Trainees: A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims From 5 Insurers
Singh, H., Thomas, E. J., Petersen, L. A., & Studdert, D. M. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.19.2030 · Cited by 407
Cited by
Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: a systematic review
Hall, L. H., Johnson, J., Watt, I., Tsipa, A., & O’Connor, D. B. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159015 · Cited by 1,683
Emotional exhaustion and workload predict clinician-rated and objective patient safety
Welp, A., Meier, L. L., & Manser, T. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01573 · Cited by 353
de Oliveira, G. S., Chang, R., Fitzgerald, P. C., Almeida, M. D., Castro-Alves, L. S., Ahmad, S., & McCarthy, R. J. (2013) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3182917da9 · Cited by 321
Burnout in the NICU setting and its relation to safety culture
Profit, J., Sharek, P. J., Amspoker, A. B., Kowalkowski, M. A., Nisbet, C. C., Thomas, E. J., Chadwick, W. A., & Sexton, J. B. (2014) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002831 · Cited by 246
Burnout in healthcare: the case for organisational change
Montgomery, A., Panagopoulou, E., Esmail, A., Richards, T., & Maslach, C. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l4774 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Prins, J. T., van der Heijden, F. M. M. A., Hoekstra-Weebers, J. E. H. M., Bakker, A. B., van de Wiel, H. B. M., Jacobs, B., & Gazendam-Donofrio, S. M.
- Venue
- Psychology, Health & Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 654-666
- ISSN
- 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3966
- OpenAlex
- W2166108043
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Burnout, engagement and resident physicians' self-reported errors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13548500903311554
- The paper
- Prins, J. T., van der Heijden, F. M. M. A., Hoekstra-Weebers, J. E. H. M., Bakker, A. B., van de Wiel, H. B. M., Jacobs, B., & Gazendam-Donofrio, S. M. (2009). Burnout, engagement and resident physicians' self-reported errors. Psychology, Health & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500903311554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.