Cited by 246Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and BurnoutStress and Burnout Research

Burnout in the NICU setting and its relation to safety culture

Open access
Profit, Jochen, Sharek, Paul J, Amspoker, Amber B, Kowalkowski, Mark A, Nisbet, Courtney C, Thomas, Eric J, Chadwick, Whitney A, Sexton, J Bryan·2014·BMJ Quality & Safety

Abstract

Background: Burnout is widespread among healthcare providers and is associated with adverse safety behaviours, operational and clinical outcomes. Little is known with regard to the explanatory links between burnout and these adverse outcomes. Objectives: (1) Test the psychometric properties of a brief four-item burnout scale, (2) Provide neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) burnout and resilience benchmarking data across different units and caregiver types, (3) Examine the relationships between caregiver burnout and patient safety culture. Research design: Cross-sectional survey study. Subjects: Nurses, nurse practitioners, respiratory care providers and physicians in 44 NICUs. Measures: Caregiver assessments of burnout and safety culture. Results: Of 3294 administered surveys, 2073 were returned for an overall response rate of 62.9%. The percentage of respondents in each NICU reporting burnout ranged from 7.5% to 54.4% (mean=25.9%, SD=10.8). The four-item burnout scale was reliable (α=0.85) and appropriate for aggregation (intra-class correlation coefficient-2=0.95). Burnout varied significantly between NICUs, p<0.0001, but was less prevalent in physicians (mean=15.1%, SD=19.6) compared with non-physicians (mean=26.9%, SD=11.4, p=0.0004). NICUs with more burnout had lower teamwork climate (r=−0.48, p=0.001), safety climate (r=−0.40, p=0.01), job satisfaction (r=−0.64, p<0.0001), perceptions of management (r=−0.50, p=0.0006) and working conditions (r=−0.45, p=0.002). Conclusions: NICU caregiver burnout appears to have ‘climate-like’ features, is prevalent, and associated with lower perceptions of patient safety culture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002831

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Kline RB Principals and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling 1998 New York, NY Gulford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Profit, J., Sharek, P. J., Amspoker, A. B., Kowalkowski, M. A., Nisbet, C. C., Thomas, E. J., Chadwick, W. A., & Sexton, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (US)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Memorial Hermann (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Profit, Jochen
Venue
BMJ Quality & Safety
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-04-17
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
806-813
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-5415
  • 2044-5423
OpenAlex
W2132520610
Cited by
246
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5
FWCI
34.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (UC1 HS014246, 1UC1HS014246)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K24HD053771, K23HD056298)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
burnout, neonatal intensive care unit, patient safety culture, safety climate, teamwork climate, job satisfaction, working conditions, healthcare workers, nurses, physicians, caregiver resilience
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Burnout, Professional, California, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Organizational Culture, Prevalence, Safety Management, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review