The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learner motivation and E-learning design: A multinationally validated process
Abstract
A general model for motivational design of instruction is described and reviewed in terms of its application to E-learning contexts. Following a description of what is meant by E-learning environments and an overview of the four category model and design process known as the ARCS model, a variety of studies are summarized. The ARCS model is based on a synthesis of motivational concepts and a problem-solving approach to design, rather than the application of specific motivational solutions that are advocated without regard to the specific characteristics of a given situation. The first group of reviewed studies illustrates the results of testing the motivational design process in several different E-learning settings, in relation to learner self-regulation and in terms of the interaction of personality characteristics and motivational strategies. The second group of studies includes tests of the validity of a simplified motivational design process that has been used in diverse types of E-learning settings, including multiple countries and cultures. Overall, the results of these empirical studies have confirmed the validity of this model for the systematic design of motivationally enhanced instruction in E-learning settings with regard to lowering drop-out rates and other positive motivational outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1978) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4 · Cited by 10,586
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Cited by
A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements
Su, C., & Cheng, C. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12088 · Cited by 648
Liu, T.-Y., & Chu, Y.-L. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023 · Cited by 549
Effects of e-learning on Students’ Motivation
Harandi, S. R. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.905 · Cited by 397
Changes in Student Motivation During Online Learning
Kim, K.-J., & Frick, T. W. (2011) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.44.1.a · Cited by 358
A systematic review of educational digital storytelling
Wu, J., & Chen, D.-T. V. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103786 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Keller, J., & Suzuki, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Media
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-239
- ISSN
- 0260-7417 (ISSN-L)
- 1358-1651
- OpenAlex
- W2124544838
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 39.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learner motivation and E-learning design: A multinationally validated process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1358165042000283084
- The paper
- Keller, J., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and E-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165042000283084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.