The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The experience of bullying in Great Britain: The impact of organizational status
Abstract
This study explores some epidemiological features of bullying in Great Britain by means of a large-scale, nationwide survey, focusing on the differences in experience with regard to organizational status. Few differences were found for the experience of self-reported bullying between workers, supervisors, middle, or senior managers. The prevalence of bullying, duration of experience, status of perpetrator, whether the experience was shared with others or not, were similar across these organizational status groups. However, different factors may account for the experience of self-reported bullying for each of the organizational status groups. More discrepancies emerged when the behavioural experience of bullying was compared across groups. Workers and supervisors were more frequently exposed to negative acts than managers. They were also more likely to have been exposed to derogatory or exclusionary behaviour, whereas managers more frequently reported exposure to extreme work pressure. Moreover, when the results were adjusted for the possible impact of gender, a number of discrepancies between the organizational status groups emerged. The interaction between status and gender was explained by reference to cultural differences between men and women, the phenomenon of the ''glass-ceiling'' and the interaction between such factors and the prevailing socio-economic situation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Journal of Management
(2020) · International Journal of Management · doi:10.35620/ijm · Cited by 2,816
The content and development of mobbing at work
Leymann, H. (1996) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594329608414853 · Cited by 2,270
An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers.
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65 · Cited by 2,154
Zapf, D., Dormann, C., & Frese, M. (1996) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.2.145 · Cited by 1,174
Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations
Einarsen, S., & Skogstad, A. (1996) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594329608414854 · Cited by 999
The nature and causes of bullying at work
Einarsen, S. (1999) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/01437729910268588 · Cited by 967
Harassment in the Workplace and the Victimization of Men
Einarsen, S., & Raknes, B. I. (1997) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/0886-6708.12.3.247 · Cited by 819
Aggression among university employees
Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Hjelt-Bäck, M. (1994) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:3<173::aid-ab2480200304>3.0.co;2-d · Cited by 778
International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2005
(2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470029307 · Cited by 728
The sources of bullying–psychological work environment and organizational climate
Vartia, M. (1996) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594329608414855 · Cited by 695
Cited by
Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678370902815673 · Cited by 1,598
Self-citationWorkplace Victimization: Aggression from the Target's Perspective
Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163703 · Cited by 731
Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders.
Rosette, A. S., & Tost, L. P. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018204 · Cited by 428
Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions
Agervold *, M., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2004) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678370412331319794 · Cited by 398
Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace
(2010) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/ebk1439804896 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoel, H., Cooper, C. L., & Faragher, B.
- Venue
- European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 443-465
- ISSN
- 1359-432X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0643
- OpenAlex
- W2122314916
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 28.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The experience of bullying in Great Britain: The impact of organizational status. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13594320143000780
- The paper
- Hoel, H., Cooper, C. L., & Faragher, B. (2001). The experience of bullying in Great Britain: The impact of organizational status. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000780
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.