CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 205Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 221 of the 224 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Five-Factor Model, forced-choice personality inventories and performance: A comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies

Salgado, Jesús F., Táuriz, Gabriel·2014·European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
DOI 10.1080/1359432x.2012.716198
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article reports a comprehensive meta-analysis of the criterion-oriented validity of the Big Five personality dimensions assessed with forced-choice (FC) inventories. Six criteria (i.e., performance ratings, training proficiency, productivity, grade-point average, global occupational performance, and global academic performance) and three types of FC scores (i.e., normative, quasi-ipsative, and ipsative) served for grouping the validity coefficients. Globally, the results showed that the Big Five assessed with FC measures have similar or slightly higher validity than the Big Five assessed with single-stimulus (SS) personality inventories. Quasi-ipsative measures of conscientiousness (K = 44, N = 8794, ρ = .40) are found to be better predictors of job performance than normative and ipsative measures. FC inventories also showed similar reliability coefficients to SS inventories. Implications of the findings for theory and practice in academic and personnel decisions are discussed, and future research is suggested.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1359432x.2012.716198

Cites

221 of 221 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. *Alonso , P. 2011 . Effects of social desirability in normative and ipsative tests Unpublished master's dissertation, Department of Social Psychology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  2. *Brown , A. and Bartram , D. Doing less but getting more: Improving forced-choice measures with IRT . Paper presented at the 24th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology . April , New Orleans, LA .
  3. *Francis-Smythe , J. , Tinline , G. and Allender , C. Identifying high potential police officers and role characteristics . Paper presented at the Division of Occupational Psychology conference, British Psychological Society . Bournemouth, UK .
  4. French , J. and Raven , B. H. 1959 . “ The basis of social power ” . In Studies in social power , Edited by: Cartwright , D. 150 – 167 . Ann Arbor, MI : University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research .
  5. *Gordon , L. V. 1993 . Gordon Personal Profile-Inventory: Manual 1993 revision , San Antonio, TX: Pearson-TalentLens .
  6. *Guller , M. Predicting performance of law enforcement personnel using the candidate and officer personnel survey and other psychological measures . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University . South Orange, NJ .
  7. *Helton , K. T. and Street , D. R. The five-factor model and naval aviation candidates . Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Naval Air Station . Pensacola, FL .
  8. Jackson , D. N. 2002 . Employee screening questionnaire manual , Port Huron, MI : Sigma Assessment Systems, ESQ .
  9. Johnson , J. A. and Hogan , R. T. 2006 . “ A socioanalytic view of faking ” . In R. L. Griffith & M. H. Peterson (Eds.), A closer examination of applicant faking behavior 209 – 231 . Charlotte, NC: IAP
  10. Kolb , D. A. 1985 . Learning style inventory , Boston, MA : McBer & Co .
  11. Kuder , F. 1975 . Manual: Kuder E general interest survey , Chicago, IL : Science Research associates .
  12. *Kusch , R. I. , Deller , J. and Albrecht , A. G. Predicting expatriate job performance: Using the normative NEO-PI-R or the ipsative OPQ32i? . Paper presented at the 29th International Congress of Psychology . July , Berlin, Germany .
  13. *McDaniel , M. A. , Yost , A. P. , Ludwick , M. H. , Hense , R. L. and Hartman , N. S. Incremental validity of a situational judgment test . Paper presented at the 19th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology . April , Chicago, IL .
  14. 10.1177/014920639802400304 · DOI
  15. Myers , I. B. , McCaulley , M. H. , Quenk , N. and Hammer , A. 1998 . MBTI handbook: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 3rd ed. , Palo Alto, CA : Consulting Psychologists Press .
  16. *Nelson , C. A. Job type as a moderator of the relationship between situational judgment and personality . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Capella University . Minneapolis, MN .
  17. Nguyen , N. T. and McDaniel , M. A. Faking and forced-choice scales in applicant screening: A meta-analysis . Paper presented at the 15th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology . April , New Orleans, LA .
  18. *Nyfield , G. , Gibbons , P. J. , Baron , H. and Robertson , I. 1995 . The cross-cultural validity of management assessment methods , Surrey, UK : Saville & Holdsworth .
  19. Oh , I.-S. , Schmidt , F. L. , Mount , M. K. , Le , H. , Guay , R. P. Takahashi , K. The five-factor model of personality and performance in East Asia . Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology . Chicago, IL . April
  20. *Olson , D. A. , Shultz , K. S. and Scott , G. The association between personality preferences and behavioral ratings for physician leaders . Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology . April , New Orleans, LA .
  21. Ones , D. S. The construct of integrity tests . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa . Iowa City, IA .
  22. Ones , D. S. and Viswesvaran , C. 2001b . “ Personality at work: Criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection ” . In Applied personality psychology , Edited by: Roberts , B. and Hogan , R. T. 63 – 92 . Washington, DC : American Psychological Association .
  23. *Rolland , J. P. and Mogenet , J. L. 2001 . Système de description en cinq dimensions (D5D). Manuel réservé aux psychologues , Paris, France : Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée .
  24. Rothmann , S. , Meiring , D. , Van der Walt , H. S. and Barrick , M. R. Predicting job performance using personality measures in South Africa . Paper presented at the 7th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology . Toronto, Canada .
  25. *Salgado , J. F. Validez del Preference and Perception Inventory (PAPI) en una compañía de servicios financieros Validity of the Preferences and Perception Inventory (PAPI) in a financial services company . Unpublished technical report, Department of Social Psychology, University of Santiago de Compostela . Spain .
  26. Salgado , J. F. The Big Five personality dimensions as predictors of alternative criteria . Paper presented at the 15th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology . April , New Orleans, LA .
  27. Salgado , J. F. and De Fruyt , F. 2005 . “ Personality in personnel selection ” . In Handbook of personnel selection , Edited by: Evers , A. , Schmit-Voskuyl , O. and Anderson , N. Oxford, UK : Blackwell .
  28. Saville , P. , Holdsworth , R. , Nyfield , G. , Cramp , L. and Mabey , W. 1984 . The Occupational Personality Questionnaires (OPQ) , London, UK : Saville & Holdsworth .
  29. Schmidt , F. L. and Le , H. 2004 . Software for the Hunter-Schmidt meta-analysis methods , Iowa City, IA : Department of Management and Organizations, University of Iowa .
  30. *SHL . 2006 . OPQ32 manual and user's guide , Surrey, UK : Author .
  31. SHL . 2009 . OPQ32r user manual , Surrey, UK : Author .
  32. *Sommerfeld , D. 1997 . Maintenance worker selection: High validity and low adverse impact. Michigan Municipal League , Ann Arbor, MI : Employment Testing Consortium Project .
  33. Tett , R. P. , Christiansen , N. D. , Robie , C. and Simonet , D. V. International survey of personality test use: An American baseline . Paper presented at the 15th conference of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology . May , Maastricht, The Netherlands .
  34. Thomas , K. W. and Killman , R. H. 1974 . Thomas-Killman Conflict Mode Instrument , Mountain View, CA : Xicom .
  35. Van der Walt , H. S. , Meiring , D. , Rothmann , S. and Barrick , M. R. Meta-analysis of the relationship between personality measurements and job performance in South Africa . Paper presented at the conference of the South-Africa Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology . June , Pretoria, South Africa .
  36. *White , L. A. A quasi-ipsative temperament measure for assessing future leaders . Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference of the International Military Testing Association . October , Otawa, Canada .
  37. Yoo , T.-Y. and Min , B.-M. A meta-analysis of the Big Five and performance in Korea . Paper presented at the 17th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology . Toronto, Canada .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 205

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Salgado, J. F., & Táuriz, G.
Affiliations
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
Corresponding author
Salgado, Jesús F.
ORCID
Salgado, Jesús F.
Venue
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2012-10-10
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
3-30
ISSN
  • 1359-432X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0643
DOI
10.1080/1359432x.2012.716198
OpenAlex
W2127358439
Cited by
205
References
224
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, criterion validity, employee performance, conscientiousness, academic performance, personnel selection, productivity, grade point average

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review