Cited by 146Gender Studies in LanguageGender Diversity and InequalityMedia, Gender, and Advertising

Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership positions? Effects of the wording of job advertisements

Horvath, Lisa Kristina, Sczesny, Sabine·2016·European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

Linguistic forms which refer to individuals impact mental representations of these individuals: When masculine generics are used, women tend to be cognitively underrepresented, whereas feminine–masculine word pairs are associated with a higher cognitive inclusion of women. The present research investigates whether linguistic forms affect women’s perceived lack of fit with leadership positions, which is particularly pronounced for high-status leadership positions. In a hiring-simulation experiment (N = 363), we tested the effects of different linguistic forms used in German-language job advertisements: (1) masculine forms (e.g., Geschäftsführer, ‘CEO, masc.’); (2) masculine forms with (m/f) (e.g., Geschäftsführer (m/w), ‘CEO, masc. (m/f)’); and (3) word pairs (e.g., Geschäftsführerin/Geschäftsführer, ‘CEO, fem./CEO, masc.’). The job ads announced either a high- or low-status leadership position. Results showed that female applicants were perceived to fit less well with the high-status position than male applicants when either the masculine or the masculine form with (m/f) was used––even though they were perceived to be equally competent. However, female and male applicants were perceived as fitting the high-status leadership position similarly well when word pairs were used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1359432x.2015.1067611

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the feminine form was included alongside the masculine, the effect of lower perceived suitability for female applicants disappeared.

    “When the feminine form was included alongside the masculine, this effect disappeared (Horvath and Sczesny, 2016).”
  • Potential female applicants for a high-status position perceived themselves as less suitable than male applicants when the job title was phrased in the masculine form.

    “Potential female applicants for a high-status position perceived themselves as less suitable than male applicants when the job title was phrased in the masculine form.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Horvath, Lisa Kristina
Venue
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Published
2015-07-30
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
316-328
ISSN
  • 1359-432X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0643
OpenAlex
W1815460137
Cited by
146
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission (237907)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
job advertisements, generic masculine, gendered language, leadership roles, women in leadership, perceived fit, gender stereotypes, hiring decisions, gender bias in hiring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review