Cited by 285Gender Diversity and InequalitySocial and Intergroup PsychologyNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions?

Glick, Peter, Zion, Cari, Nelson, Cynthia·1988·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.178

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some research suggests that gender bias in hiring decisions arises from the (mis)fit between stereotypical beliefs about men and women and semantic beliefs about different occupations.

    “In line with this concern, some research suggests that gender bias in hiring decisions arises from the (mis)fit between stereotypical beliefs about men and women and semantic beliefs about different occupations (Glick et al. 1988).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glick, P., Zion, C., & Nelson, C.
Affiliations
Lawrence University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1988-08
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
178-186
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1977559831
Cited by
284
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
gender discrimination, hiring decisions, gender bias, mediation, employment discrimination, job applicants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review