Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fostering Creativity in Engineering Undergraduates

Cropley, David H., Cropley, Arthur J.·2000·High Ability Studies

Abstract

In the present study, an attempt was made to facilitate for engineering undergraduates to come up with innovative ideas by teaching creativity, not simply in a paper and pencil test situation but also in a practical exercise. A total of 64 male engineering undergraduates received three lectures on creativity at the beginning of a course on engineering innovation. Some of them (N=37) also completed a ''creativity'' test: TCT-DP (Urban & Jellen, 1996) and were individually counselled on the basis of test scores. A separate control group (N=21) took the test together with these students, but otherwise did not participate in any way in the study. Upon retesting 6 weeks later the counselled students were more innovative, whereas the control group were simply less inhibited. In addition, machines constructed by the counselled students were more elegant and creative than those of the 27 students who merely attended the lectures. Thus, the training was associated with changes in behaviour not only on the test, but in a practical activity also.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13598130020001223

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J.
Venue
High Ability Studies
Published
2000-12
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
207-219
ISSN
  • 1359-8139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-834X
OpenAlex
W1973838802
Cited by
191
References
0
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fostering Creativity in Engineering Undergraduates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13598130020001223
The paper
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2000). Fostering Creativity in Engineering Undergraduates. High Ability Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130020001223

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.