The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fostering Creativity in Engineering Undergraduates
Abstract
In the present study, an attempt was made to facilitate for engineering undergraduates to come up with innovative ideas by teaching creativity, not simply in a paper and pencil test situation but also in a practical exercise. A total of 64 male engineering undergraduates received three lectures on creativity at the beginning of a course on engineering innovation. Some of them (N=37) also completed a ''creativity'' test: TCT-DP (Urban & Jellen, 1996) and were individually counselled on the basis of test scores. A separate control group (N=21) took the test together with these students, but otherwise did not participate in any way in the study. Upon retesting 6 weeks later the counselled students were more innovative, whereas the control group were simply less inhibited. In addition, machines constructed by the counselled students were more elegant and creative than those of the 27 students who merely attended the lectures. Thus, the training was associated with changes in behaviour not only on the test, but in a practical activity also.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400410409534549 · Cited by 1,132
Defining and measuring creativity:Are creativity tests worth using?
Cropley, A. J. (2000) · Roeper Review · doi:10.1080/02783190009554069 · Cited by 383
Self-citationImpact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design
Robertson, B. F., & Radcliffe, D. F. (2009) · Computer-Aided Design · doi:10.1016/j.cad.2008.06.007 · Cited by 287
Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses
Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M. (2014) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20048 · Cited by 281
Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & Bandalos, D. L. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282456 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J.
- Venue
- High Ability Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-219
- ISSN
- 1359-8139 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-834X
- OpenAlex
- W1973838802
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fostering Creativity in Engineering Undergraduates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13598130020001223
- The paper
- Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2000). Fostering Creativity in Engineering Undergraduates. High Ability Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130020001223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.