Cited by 110Nursing care and researchPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Comparative Analysis of Informal Caregiver Burden in Advanced Cancer, Dementia, and Acquired Brain Injury

Open access
Harding, Richard, Gao, Wei, Jackson, Diana, Pearson, Clare, Murray, Joanna, Higginson, Irene J.·2015·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Context Measurement and improvement of informal caregiver burden are central aims of policy and intervention. Burden itself is a complex construct, and total burden can differ by patient diagnosis, although how diagnosis affects different aspects of caregiver subjective burden is unclear. Objectives To compare the subjective burden of caregivers across three diagnostic groups using the 22-item Zarit Burden Inventory. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of pooled cross-sectional data from four U.K. studies of informal caregivers of patients with advanced cancer (n = 105), dementia (n = 131), and acquired brain injury (ABI) (n = 215). Zarit Burden Inventory totals, subscales (personal and role strain), and individual mean scores were compared between diagnostic groups using the general linear model, adjusting for caregiver characteristics. Results Caregiver age (mean years [SD]: cancer 66.1 [12.0]; dementia 61.9 [13.4]; and ABI 53.8 [10.9]) differed significantly across diagnostic groups (P < 0.001); 81.9%, 36.6%, and 59.1% of caregivers were spouse/partners, respectively (P < 0.001). Total burden was highest in ABI caregivers and lowest in cancer (mean total score [SD]: cancer 23.3 [13.4]; dementia 27.9 [16.4]; and ABI 39.1 [17.3]) (P < 0.001). Subscale scores showed similar patterns (mean personal and role subscale scores [SD]: cancer 11.8 [6.9], 5.8 [4.8]; dementia 14.4 [8.8], 7.3 [5.7]; and ABI 18.7 [9.1], 11.8 [6.0]) (P < 0.001 for both subscales). Most (17 of 22) individual item scores differed by diagnosis group (P < 0.05), except concepts of duty, responsibility, and perception of financial situation. Conclusion Our data show that total, subscale, and most individual elements of caregiver subjective burden differ between cancer, dementia, and ABI caregivers. This should be considered when designing future intervention strategies to reduce caregiver burden in these groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.04.005

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is plausible that the impact of pancreatic cancer on informal caregivers is potentially distinct.

    “It is therefore plausible that the impact of pancreatic cancer on informal caregivers is potentially distinct [18].”

    From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Introduction says caregiver support should be tailored to diagnostic groups, and the Discussion reports differences in burden between caregivers of people with advanced cancer, dementia, and acquired brain injury. This supports the general possibility of distinct caregiver impacts, but the paper does not assess pancreatic cancer specifically or compare cancer types. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a study from the United Kingdom that included 105 informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients, the mean ZBI-22 score was 23.

    “In a study from the United Kingdom that included 105 informal caregivers of advanced cancer patients, the mean ZBI-22 score was 23 [26].”
  • There has been little improvement in pancreatic cancer survival over the past 30 years.

    “there has been little improvement over the past 30 years [18]”

    From Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Discussion compares caregiver burden across advanced cancer, dementia, and acquired brain injury; it does not discuss pancreatic cancer survival. Searches for “pancreatic cancer survival” and “30 years” found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed survival trend. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Stommel M, Given CW, Given BA. The cost of cancer home care to families. Cancer 1993;71:1867e1874.
  2. Houde SC. Predictors of elders' and family caregivers' use of formal home services. Res Nurs Health 1998;21: 533e543.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harding, R., Gao, W., Jackson, D., Pearson, C., Murray, J., & Higginson, I. J.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Harding, Richard
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
445-452
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037901168
Cited by
110
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
24.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Health Service
  • Department of Health (030/0066)
  • Department of Health Policy Research Programme
  • Luff Foundation
  • Dunhill Medical Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
Zarit Burden Inventory, advanced cancer, dementia, acquired brain injury, personal strain, role strain, spousal caregivers, caregiver characteristics
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain Injuries, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Family, Female, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Linear Models, Caregivers, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review