Cited by 74Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPrimary Care and Health OutcomesGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Primary care providers’ views of challenges and rewards of dementia care relative to other conditions

Open access
Harris, Dorothy P., Chodosh, Joshua, Vassar, Stefanie D., Vickrey, Barbara G., Shapiro, Martin F.·2009·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare primary care providers' (PCPs') perceptions about dementia and its care within their healthcare organization with perceptions of other common chronic conditions and to explore factors associated with differences. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Three California healthcare organizations. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-four PCPs. MEASUREMENTS: PCPs' views about primary care for dementia were analyzed and compared with views about care for heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and selected other conditions. Differences in views about conditions according to PCP type (internists, family physicians) were assessed. Multivariate analysis examined relationships between provider and practice characteristics and views about dementia care. RESULTS: More PCPs strongly agreed that older patients with dementia are difficult to manage (23.8%) than for heart disease (5.0%) or diabetes mellitus (6.3%); PCPs can improve quality of life for heart disease (58.9%) and diabetes mellitus (61.6%) than for dementia (30.9%); older patients should be routinely screened for heart disease (63.8%) and diabetes mellitus (67.7%) than dementia (55.5%); and their organizations have expertise/referral resources to manage diabetes mellitus (49.4%) and heart disease (51.8%) than dementia (21.1%). More PCPs reported almost effortless organizational care coordination for heart disease (13.0%) or diabetes mellitus (13.7%) than for dementia (5.6%), and a great deal or many opportunities for improvement in their ability to manage dementia (50.6%) than incontinence, depression, or hypertension (7.4-34.0%; all P<.05). Internists' views regarding dementia care were less optimistic than those of family physicians, but PCP type was unrelated to views on diabetes mellitus or heart disease. CONCLUSION: Improving primary care management of dementia should directly address PCP concerns about expertise and referral resources, difficulty of care provision, and PCP views about prospects for patient improvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02572.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contrast to other chronic conditions, dementia is perceived as a more challenging condition to manage.

    “Although, in contrast to other chronic conditions, dementia is perceived as a more challenging condition to manage [55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, D. P., Chodosh, J., Vassar, S. D., Vickrey, B. G., & Shapiro, M. F.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12
Volume
57
Issue
12
Pages
2209-2216
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1487103678
Cited by
74
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (4p20md000182-15)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P20-MD000182)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dementia care, primary care providers, provider perceptions, chronic disease, heart disease, diabetes mellitus, care coordination, referral resources, internists, general practitioners, older adults, quality of life
MeSH terms
Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Internal Medicine, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Primary Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review