Cited by 26Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Using focus groups to explore caregiver transitions and needs after placement of family members living with dementia in 24-hour care homes

Cottrell, L., Duggleby, W., Ploeg, J., McAiney, C., Peacock, S., Ghosh, S., Holroyd-Leduc, J. M., Nekolaichuk, C. +3 more·2020·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

Objectives: Family caregivers (defined broadly as family and friends) of persons with dementia are challenged to cope with myriad stressors and changes that occur along the dementia trajectory. The purpose of this study was to explore the transitions experienced by caregivers of persons with dementia after their relative relocated to a 24-hour care home.Method: Qualitative thematic and conversational analysis were used: themes were co-created and modes of speech and syntactical patterns analysed to expose discourses related to caregiving after placement in 24-hour care homes.Results: Four main themes were co-constructed from the data analysis: living with loss, relinquishing, redefining the caregiving role, and rediscovering and recreating a new self.Discussion: Caregiving continues after placement of family members with dementia in 24-hour care homes. Caregivers are at-risk group and require ongoing support throughout the caregiving journey. Study participants reported that navigation skills such as relationship building, communication, and advocacy were particularly salient to the post-placement period, when navigating the complex health care environment was a significant obstacle. Ultimately, findings from these focus groups will be used to inform an online intervention to support caregivers of a family member with dementia residing in a 24-hour care home.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2018.1531369

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cottrell, L., Duggleby, W., Ploeg, J., McAiney, C., Peacock, S., Ghosh, S., Holroyd-Leduc, J. M., Nekolaichuk, C., Forbes, D., Paragg, J., & Swindle, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Cottrell, L.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2018-12-27
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
227-232
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2907848839
Cited by
26
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Frailty Network
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
family caregivers, dementia, caregiver transition, caregiver needs, loss, relationship building, communication, advocacy, online intervention, long-term care
MeSH terms
Transitional Care, Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Communication, Dementia, Family, Female, Home Nursing, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review