Cited by 151Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and research

Family caregivers’ experiences of relinquishing the care of a person with dementia to a nursing home: insights from a meta‐ethnographic study

Graneheim, Ulla H., Johansson, Anneli, Lindgren, Britt‐Marie·2014·Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Abstract

Many people with dementia are cared for in their homes by family caregivers. As the dementia progresses, admission of the family member to a nursing home becomes inevitable. The aim of this meta-ethnographic study was to describe caregivers' experiences of relinquishing the care of a family member with dementia to a nursing home. A systematic literature search of PubMed, Cinahl and PsychInfo, between the years 1992 and 2012, was performed, and 10 qualitative articles, based on 180 family caregivers' experiences, were included. The family caregivers' described their experiences as a process that went from being responsible for the decision, through living with the decision, adjusting to a new caring role and having changed relationships. They felt unprepared and lonely with these changes. They experienced loss, guilt and shame, but also feelings of relief. Their roles in the nursing home environment were to make sure that the individual needs of the person with dementia were respected and to monitor the quality of care. They wished to maintain their relationship with the person with dementia and to establish meaningful relationships with caring staff. The process of relinquishing care is similar to a crisis process, which starts with a turning point, followed by a coping face and finally the outcome of the process. The adaption to the new situation can be facilitated if the family caregivers are recognised as partners in the care of the person with dementia. The family caregivers' unique knowledge of their relatives' previous life story should be acknowledged in both care planning and daily care. Welcoming family caregivers to regular meetings with staff can contribute to increase the feeling of partnership. Offering staff clinical supervision could be one way of preparing them to deal with the emotional strain reported by family caregivers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/scs.12046

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graneheim, U. H., Johansson, A., & Lindgren, B.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-12
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
215-224
ISSN
  • 0283-9318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6712
OpenAlex
W1966666864
Cited by
151
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
family caregivers, dementia, nursing home admission, caregiver experiences, guilt and shame, loss, caregiver role change, caregiver partnership, care planning, clinical supervision
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Dementia, Family, Humans, Nursing Homes, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review