Cited by 42Mental Health Treatment and AccessPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Barriers and facilitators to depression screening in older adults: a qualitative study

Colligan, Erin M., Cross-Barnet, Caitlin, Lloyd, Jennifer T., McNeely, Jessica·2020·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this qualitative study was to better understand facilitators and barriers to depression screening for older adults.Methods: We conducted 43 focus groups with 102 providers and 247 beneficiaries or proxies: 13 focus groups with Medicare providers, 28 with older Medicare beneficiaries, and 2 with caregivers of older Medicare beneficiaries. Each focus group was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using principles of grounded theory.Results: There was widespread consensus among beneficiary and provider focus group participants that depression screening was important. However, several barriers interfered with effective depression screening, including stigma, lack of resources for treatment referrals, and lack of time during medical encounters. Positive communication with providers and an established relationship with a trusted provider were primary facilitators for depression screening. Providers who took the time to put their beneficiaries at ease and used conversational language rather than clinical terms appeared to have the most success in eliciting beneficiary honesty about depressive symptoms. Respondents stressed the need for providers to be attentive, concerned, non-judgmental, and respectful.Conclusion: Findings indicate that using person-centered approaches to build positive communication and trust between beneficiaries and providers could be an effective strategy for improving depression screening. Better screening can lead to higher rates of diagnosis and treatment of depression that could enhance quality of life for older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2018.1531376

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sonde Health is a voice-based technology that can be used as a digital biomarker for depression, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.60 and 0.70, respectively.

    “Sonde Health is a voice-based technology that can be used as a digital biomarker for depression, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.60 and 0.70, respectively.”

    From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [120]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colligan, E. M., Cross-Barnet, C., Lloyd, J. T., & McNeely, J.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (US)
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Corresponding author
Colligan, Erin M.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2018-12-27
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
341-348
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2907817759
Cited by
42
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (HHSM-500-2011-00019I)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression screening, older adults, barriers to screening, facilitators of screening, stigma, provider-patient communication, trust in providers, person-centred care, Medicare beneficiaries, caregivers, depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Female, Medicare, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Quality of Life, United States, Caregivers, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Social Stigma, Grounded Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review