The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Delphi technique in health sciences education research
Abstract
The Delphi technique is a method of collecting opinion on a particular research question. It is based on the premise that pooled intelligence enhances individual judgement and captures the collective opinion of a group of experts without being physically assembled. The conventional Delphi uses a series of questionnaires to generate expert opinion in an anonymous fashion and takes place over a series of rounds. The technique is becoming a popular strategy that straddles both quantitative and qualitative realms. Issues that are critical to its validity are the development of the questionnaire; definition of consensus and how to interpret non-consensus; criteria for and selection of the expert panel; sample size; and data analysis. The authors used the Delphi technique to assist with making recommendations regarding education and training for medical practitioners working in district hospitals in South Africa. The objective of this Delphi was to obtain consensus opinion on content and methods relating to the maintenance of competence of these doctors. They believe the experience gained from their work may be useful for other health science education researchers wishing to use the Delphi method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use
Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M., & Brook, R. H. (1984) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.74.9.979 · Cited by 2,089
Cited by
Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map
Niederberger, M., & Spranger, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457 · Cited by 1,072
Bishop, D. V. M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., Greenhalgh, T., & CATALISE consortium (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158753 · Cited by 831
Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing
Streiner, D. L., & Kottner, J. (2014) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12402 · Cited by 463
Waggoner, J., Carline, J. D., & Durning, S. J. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001092 · Cited by 429
Delphi Panels: Research Design, Procedures, Advantages, and Challenges
R Avella, J. (2016) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/3561 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- de Villiers, M. R., de Villiers, P. J. T., & Kent, A. P.
- Venue
- Medical Teacher
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 639-643
- ISSN
- 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-187X
- OpenAlex
- W2063240798
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13611260500069947
- The paper
- de Villiers, M. R., de Villiers, P. J. T., & Kent, A. P. (2005). The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Medical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260500069947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.