Cited by 85Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Therapies in Reducing Symptoms of Depression: A Meta-Analysis

McCarney, Robert William, Schulz, Joerg, Grey, Andrew Robert·2012·European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling

Abstract

Mindfulness-based therapies are a recent development within the cognitive-behavioural tradition and an important element of the third wave cognitive behavioural therapy models. A number of these therapies could be considered to have mindfulness as a major component of the therapy. There has been a considerable growth of interest in these therapies with an accompanying increase in their evidence base. While a number of reviews have been conducted, these therapies were not comprehensively appraised. The most prominent of these therapies, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, was developed to reduce relapse in recurrent depression. We conducted a meta-analysis which looked at therapies considered to have mindfulness as a major component. We investigated whether this group of therapies was effective in reducing current depressive symptomatology as measured by the Beck depression inventory (BDI). A total of 11 studies were included in the analysis. We found a significant mean reduction score in current depressive symptomatology, as measured by the BDI, of 8.73 points (95% confidence interval = 6.61, 10.86). We found evidence for the effectiveness of these major-component therapies in reducing levels of active depression. The robustness of these findings is discussed alongside the implications for research and practice within the context of the current literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13642537.2012.713186

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarney, R. W., Schulz, J., & Grey, A. R.
Affiliations
University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
McCarney, Robert William
Venue
European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling
Published
2012-09
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
279-299
ISSN
  • 1364-2537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5901
OpenAlex
W2166864562
Cited by
85
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, depression, depressive symptoms, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, relapse prevention, Beck Depression Inventory, treatment effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review