Cited by 663Educational Research and MethodsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Comparative Analysis Research

Mixing methods: the entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process

Open access
Brannen, Julia·2005·International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Abstract

Qualitative and quantitative research are often presented as two fundamentally different paradigms through which we study the social world. These paradigms act as lightning conductors to which sets of epistemological assumptions, theoretical approaches and methods are attracted. Each is seen to be incompatible with the other. These paradigmatic claims have a tendency to resurface from time to time, manifesting themselves in the effects of different cultural traditions upon intellectual styles of research. There are pressures to view research in terms of this divide but perhaps more pressures to ignore such a divide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13645570500154642

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data generated through interview were triangulated with study documents to corroborate, elaborate, contradict or complement other data.

    “Data generated through interview were triangulated (including with study documents) to corroborate, elaborate, contradict or complement other data, 155 in order to interpret PPI processes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ong, P. (Ed.). (1999). Impacts of affirmative action. Los Angeles: AltaMira Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brannen, J.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Brannen, Julia
Venue
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2005-07
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
173-184
ISSN
  • 1364-5579 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5300
OpenAlex
W2012430895
Cited by
663
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 38
FWCI
59.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Social Research Methodology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Keywords
qualitative-quantitative divide, mixed methods, research paradigms, epistemological assumptions, research traditions, qualitative-quantitative integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review