Cited by 10Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Evaluation of a group format of clinician‐guided, parent‐delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for child anxiety in routine clinical practice: a pilot‐implementation study

Open access
Evans, Rachel, Hill, Claire, O'Brien, Doireann, Creswell, Cathy·2019·Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Abstract

Background: Randomised controlled trials suggest that cognitive behavioural therapy ( CBT ) delivered by parents who are guided, in groups, by clinicians (Group GPD ‐ CBT ) is an efficacious and potentially efficient treatment approach for child anxiety. The extent to which these results translate to routine settings is unclear. We evaluated Group GPD ‐ CBT as delivered in UK routine clinical services. Method: Retrospective data regarding attendance and outcomes were routinely collected for 83 children whose parent(s) had attended Group GPD ‐ CBT . Semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 clinicians who had delivered Group GPD ‐ CBT . Results: By 3–8 months ( M = 5.22, SD = 1.17) post‐treatment, 70% of children were discharged or referred for support for other (non‐anxiety) conditions, without any further intervention for anxiety. Of the subset ( N = 20) with available parent‐report symptom data, there was a significant decline in total anxiety score from pre‐ to post‐treatment. Clinician interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. This revealed that clinicians found Group GPD ‐ CBT to be acceptable and described it as a helpful, practical and empowering treatment for child anxiety. They highlighted additional benefits associated with group process factors (e.g. peer support, enhanced engagement), although noted that some, particularly anxious, parents were reluctant to attend a group format. Conclusions: Results were promising regarding children's outcomes following Group GPD ‐ CBT delivered in routine practice. Group GPD ‐ CBT was viewed by clinicians as acceptable and helpful, and group process factors were seen to provide additional benefits. Some parents may find it difficult to attend a group format, suggesting that services should give careful consideration to how groups are presented and introduced to parents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/camh.12274

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Guy, W. (1976). The Clinical Global Impresssion Scale; ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: © 2018 The Authors. Child and Adolescent Mental Health published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. doi:10.1111/camh.12274 Group guided parent-delivered CBT for child anxiety US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Mental Health Adminis- tration, National Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharma- cology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs, pp. 218-222.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, R., Hill, C., O'Brien, D., & Creswell, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences University of Reading Reading UK
Corresponding author
Hill, Claire
Venue
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-13
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
36-43
ISSN
  • 1475-357X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3588
OpenAlex
W2794191447
Cited by
10
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child and Adolescent Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP_2014-04-018, PB-PG-0110-21190)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
childhood anxiety, cognitive behavioral therapy, routine clinical practice, implementation, treatment outcomes, clinician acceptability, peer support, parental involvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review