Cited by 44Focus Groups and Qualitative MethodsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

The use of email-facilitated interviewing with higher functioning autistic people participating in a grounded theory study

Benford, P., Standen, P.J.·2011·International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Abstract

This paper explores the inclusive potential of computer‐mediated communication (CMC) for a ‘hard to reach’ group of research participants, specifically people at the higher functioning end of the autistic spectrum. Drawing on the literature pertaining to the fields of autism, CMC and research methods, as well as the first author’s experience of using email as a means of conducting interviews, the paper will discuss the epistemological, methodological and practical issues raised by the use of this method of collecting data from higher functioning autistic people, as well as its suitability in the context of a study guided by grounded theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13645579.2010.534654

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Approaches to improving mental healthcare for autistic people: Systematic review

    Loizou, S., Pemovska, T., Stefanidou, T., Foye, U., Cooper, R., Kular, A., Greenburgh, A., Baldwin, H., Griffiths, J., Saunders, K. R. K., et al. (2024) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2024.707 · Cited by 22 · see citing works

    “…the design, conduct or write-up of the study; (2) for studies with qualitative elements, reported adjustments made to the data collection process; 24 (3) for studies with quantitative elements, reported adjustments made to the data collection tools; 25 (4) for studies with quantitative elements,…”

Authors
Benford, P., & Standen, P. J.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Benford, P.
Venue
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2011-09
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
353-368
ISSN
  • 1364-5579 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5300
OpenAlex
W2010088541
Cited by
44
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Social Research Methodology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
computer-mediated communication, high-functioning autism, autistic people, inclusive research, grounded theory, epistemology of research, research ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review