The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews
Open accessAbstract
Internet based methods of communication are becoming increasingly important and influencing researchers’ options. VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) technologies (such as Skype and FaceTime) provide us with the ability to interview research participants using voice and video across the internet via a synchronous (real-time) connection. This paper highlights the advantages of using Skype to conduct qualitative interviews and weighs these advantages against any limitations and issues that using this tool may raise. This paper argues that Skype opens up new possibilities by allowing us to contact participants worldwide in a time efficient and financially affordable manner, thus increasing the variety of our samples. At the same time, the use of Skype affects the areas of rapport, non-verbal cues and ethics by creating limitations but also new opportunities. The observations in this paper stem from two different researches, carried out by the authors, on dance (as a form of trans/cultural heritage) and wayfinding (the experience of getting from A to B in various settings). These studies lent themselves to using Skype for qualitative interviews, because of the need to reach an international, varied and purposeful sample. The researchers’ experiences, combined with feedback from participants in Skype interviews, are used in this paper. The conclusion is that, although VoIP mediated interviews cannot completely replace face to face interaction, they work well as a viable alternative or complimentary data collection tool for qualitative researchers. This paper argues that VoIP based interviews offer new opportunities for researchers and should be embraced with confidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences
Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612442904 · Cited by 1,226
Transculturality: The Puzzling form of Cultures Today
Welsch, W. (1999) · Spaces of Culture: City, Nation, World · doi:10.4135/9781446218723.n11 · Cited by 637
Promoting older adults’ well-being through Internet training and use
Shapira, N., Barak, A., & Gal, I. (2007) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860601086546 · Cited by 501 · cited 1×
“…in the course of our research, we have found that this was not the case; our experience reflects the findings of other studies which show how the elderly are willing to embrace new technologies for practical uses (Fokkema & Knipscheer 2007; Kiel 2005; Shapira et al. 2007; White et al. 2002).”
ResultWhite, H., McConnell, E., Clipp, E., Branch, L. G., Sloane, R., Pieper, C., & Box, T. L. (2002) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860220142422 · Cited by 387
Fokkema, T., & Knipscheer, K. (2007) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860701366129 · Cited by 230
Cited by
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919874596 · Cited by 2,164
“Such technologies therefore replicate features of face-to-face interviews (i.e., ability to transmit and respond to verbal and nonverbal cues) while providing unique advantages, challenges, and considerations (Lo Iacono et al., 2016).”
BackgroundQualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing
Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406920937875 · Cited by 819
Swart, J. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211008828 · Cited by 381
Thunberg, S., & Arnell, L. (2022) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565 · Cited by 280
O Donnell, F., Porter, M., & Fitzgerald, D. S. (2024) · Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.22554/szwjfy54 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Lo Iacono, V., Symonds, P., & Brown, D. H. K.
- Venue
- Sociological Research Online
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-117
- ISSN
- 1360-7804 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2496085402
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 82.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5153/sro.3952
- The paper
- Lo Iacono, V., Symonds, P., & Brown, D. H. K. (2016). Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews. Sociological Research Online. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3952
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.