Cited by 25Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Relationships between obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression and functioning before and after exposure and response prevention therapy

Open access
Motivala, Sarosh J., Arellano, Maria, Greco, Rebecca L., Aitken, David, Hutcheson, Nathan, Tadayonnejad, Reza, O’Neill, Joseph, Feusner, Jamie D.·2018·International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is associated with impaired functioning and depression. Our aim was to examine relationships between OCD symptoms, depression and functioning before and after exposure and response prevention (ERP), a type of cognitive-behavioural therapy for OCD, specifically examining whether functioning, depression and other cognitive factors like rumination and worry acted as mediators. METHODS: Forty-four individuals with OCD were randomised to 4 weeks of intensive ERP treatment first (n = 23) or waitlist then treatment (n = 21). We used a bootstrapping method to examine mediation models. RESULTS: OCD symptoms, depression and functioning significantly improved from pre- to post-intervention. Functioning mediated the relationship between OCD symptoms and depression and the relationship between functioning and depression was stronger at post-treatment. Depression mediated the relationship between OCD symptoms and functioning, but only at post-intervention. Similarly, rumination mediated the relationship between OCD symptoms and depression at post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that after ERP, relationships between depression and functioning become stronger. Following ERP, treatment that focuses on depression and functioning, including medication management for depression, cognitive approaches targeting rumination, and behavioural activation to boost functionality may be important clinical interventions for OCD patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13651501.2017.1351991

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OCD and depression share some dysfunctional beliefs and coping strategies, such as rumination.

    “because OCD and depression have a lifetime comorbidity of 56.6% [61] and share some dysfunctional beliefs and coping strategies, such as rumination [62–64].”

    From Metacognitive Training for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Objective section describes rumination as important in depression and associated with OCD, and explains how beliefs in OCD can trigger rumination as a way to manage distressing thoughts. It does not establish that OCD and depression share the same dysfunctional beliefs, although it supports rumination as a process relevant to both. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Depressive symptoms, especially rumination, are highly relevant as targets for patients with OCD.

    “thus depressive symptoms, especially rumination [62–64], are highly relevant as targets for patients with OCD.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kozak MJ Foa EB 1997a Mastery of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a cognitive-behavioral approach client workbook New York Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Motivala, S. J., Arellano, M., Greco, R. L., Aitken, D., Hutcheson, N., Tadayonnejad, R., O’Neill, J., & Feusner, J. D.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Motivala, Sarosh J.
Venue
International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice
Published
2017-07-25
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
40-46
ISSN
  • 1365-1501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-1788
OpenAlex
W2725702475
Cited by
25
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH085900)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, functioning, exposure and response prevention, rumination, worry, mediation, behavioral activation, cognitive behavioral therapy
MeSH terms
Rumination, Cognitive, Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review