The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response
Abstract
Climate change is a threat to human health and life, both now and in the future. Despite this, studies show that the public typically do not consider the issue a priority concern or a direct, personal threat. Furthermore, few are taking any preventive or protective action. Previous studies identify direct experience as a major influence on risk perception, learning and action. Drawing on such evidence, this paper focuses on the intangibility of climate change as a key impediment to personal engagement and explores whether relevant experiences of flooding and air pollution influence individuals' knowledge, attitudes, risk perception and behavioural responses to climate change. Perhaps surprisingly, interviews and a survey conducted in the south of England indicate flood victims differ very little from other participants in their understanding of and responses to climate change, but that experience of air pollution does significantly affect perceptions of and behavioural responses to climate change. Air pollution victims are no more likely to cite pollution as a cause of climate change than non‐victims; but they do have higher pro‐environmental values. Respondents with these values are significantly more likely to consider climate change a salient risk and to take action in response to it. Therefore the relationship between air pollution experience and responses to climate change may be indirect and mediated by environmental values. The paper concludes by highlighting implications of this research for developing climate change policies and strategies for public engagement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems
Parmesan, C., & Yohe, G. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01286 · Cited by 11,265
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
(1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477 · Cited by 8,240
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
Value orientations, gender and environmental concern
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916593255002 · Cited by 2,162 · cited 1×
“Yet, where the risk is apparently greater for other people or species, individuals tend to act if they value these threatened groups and consider they have some responsibility for helping them (Stern et al., 1993).”
BackgroundThe Role of the Affect and Availability Heuristics in Risk Communication
Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00773.x · Cited by 551
Whitmarsh, L. (2009) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662506073088 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Cited by
The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x · Cited by 1,796
Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003 · Cited by 1,765
Self-citationMeta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2943 · Cited by 1,616
Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time
Whitmarsh, L. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016 · Cited by 890
Self-citationPerception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research
Kellens, W., Terpstra, T., & De Maeyer, P. (2013) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x · Cited by 759
Metadata
- Authors
- Whitmarsh, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Risk Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 351-374
- ISSN
- 1366-9877 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4461
- OpenAlex
- W2141918002
- Cited by
- 758
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 58.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13669870701552235
- The paper
- Whitmarsh, L. (2008). Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701552235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.