The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Affective publics: sentiment, technology, and politics
Abstract
Zizi Papacharissi’s newest book release, Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics, will not leave any reader indifferent. The Head of UIC’s Communication Department presents affect as...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Massanari, A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815608807 · Cited by 1,264
An Emotional Turn in Journalism Studies?
Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2020) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2019.1697626 · Cited by 384
Showing They Care (Or Don’t): Affective Publics and Ambivalent Climate Activism on TikTok
Hautea, S., Parks, P., Takahashi, B., & Zeng, J. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211012344 · Cited by 348
Dosono, B., & Semaan, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300372 · Cited by 178
Zhang, Y., Wells, C., Wang, S., & Rohe, K. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817744390 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Perelló-Sobrepere, M.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-12-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1788-1790
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W2559840960
- Cited by
- 1,140
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affective publics: sentiment, technology, and politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1259344
- The paper
- Perelló-Sobrepere, M. (2017). Affective publics: sentiment, technology, and politics. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1259344
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
