CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 176Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationSocial and Intergroup PsychologyMigration, Racism, and Human Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Migrant categorizations and European public opinion: diverging attitudes towards immigrants and refugees

Open access
De Coninck, David·2020·Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
DOI 10.1080/1369183x.2019.1694406
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In recent years, European media and public discourse have been increasingly categorising newcomers using terminology like ‘immigrants’ and ‘refugees’. The aim of this practice is to distinguish legitimate from illegitimate newcomers in the wake of the 2015 ‘refugee crisis’ in Europe. Drawing on data from an online survey in Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Sweden (n = 6000) in September and October of 2017, this article investigates how the use of these categories relates to public opinion on ‘immigrants’ and ‘refugees’. Findings show that people hold more positive attitudes towards ‘refugees’ than towards ‘immigrants’, a process which is likely driven by media framing. Attitude discrepancies within ‘immigrant’ and ‘refugee’ categories are also investigated, as categorical fetishism causes further differentiation of attitudes within these groups. Public opinion differences within ‘immigrants’ and ‘refugees’ are found along three cleavages: ethnicity, the economic situation of the origin country, and region of origin. Newcomers with the same ethnicity (vs. a different ethnicity), from ‘rich’ countries (vs. ‘poor’ countries), and from European countries (vs. non-European countries) are preferred in both categories. With these findings, this article reveals important aspects of the influence of migrant categorizations on public opinion towards vulnerable groups of newcomers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1369183x.2019.1694406

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Augoustinos M., 2001, Representations of the Social, 201
  2. Haslam S. A., 2001, Psychology in Organisations: The Social Identity Approach
  3. Lawlor A., 2017, International Journal of Communication, 11, 967
  4. Wieviorka M., 2018, Europe’s Crises, 205

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–176 of 176

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
De Coninck, D.
Affiliations
Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Belgium
ORCID
De Coninck, David
Venue
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-11-21
Volume
46
Issue
9
Pages
1667-1686
ISSN
  • 1369-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9451
DOI
10.1080/1369183x.2019.1694406
OpenAlex
W2991438502
Cited by
175
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8
FWCI
21.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BR/165/A4/IMMEDIATE, BR/165/A4)
  • KU Leuven
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
Keywords
migrant categorization, public opinion on immigrants, attitudes toward refugees, 2015 refugee crisis, media framing, region of origin, Belgium, France, Netherlands, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review