The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The global prevalence of primary ovarian insufficiency and early menopause: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the global prevalence of primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) and early menopause (EM).Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in several databases to retrieve relevant English articles published between 1980 and 2017. To assess the methodological quality of the studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used. The heterogeneity of results across the studies was assessed using Cochran’s Q test and quantified by the I2 statistic. Prevalence estimates of all studies were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis model at a confidence level of 95%.Results: A total of 8937 potentially relevant articles were identified from the initial searches. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of POI and EM was calculated as 3.7% (95% confidence interval: 3.1, 4.3) and 12.2% (95% confidence interval: 10.5, 14), respectively. The prevalence of POI was higher in medium and low Human Development Index countries. The prevalence trend did not change over time.Conclusion: The prevalence of POI and EM in women is considerable. The results of this study could contribute to consciousness-raising of health policy-makers toward the necessity of prioritizing, planning, and allocating health resources as preventive and treatment interventions for these women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stang, A. (2010) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z · Cited by 17,396
Schoenaker, D. A., Jackson, C. A., Rowlands, J. V., & Mishra, G. D. (2014) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyu094 · Cited by 550
Løkkegaard, E., Jovanovic, Z., Heitmann, B. L., Keiding, N., Ottesen, B., & Pedersen, A. T. (2006) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.04.009 · Cited by 243
Impact of a premature menopause on cognitive function in later life
Ryan, J., Scali, J., Carrière, I., Amieva, H., Rouaud, O., Berr, C., Ritchie, K., & Ancelin, M. (2014) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12828 · Cited by 209
Effect of primary ovarian insufficiency and early natural menopause on mortality: a meta-analysis
Tao, X.-Y., Zuo, A.-Z., Wang, J.-Q., & Tao, F.-B. (2016) · Climacteric · doi:10.3109/13697137.2015.1094784 · Cited by 147
Cited by
Premature ovarian insufficiency: an international menopause society white paper
Panay, N., Anderson, R. A., Nappi, R. E., Vincent, A. J., Vujovic, S., Webber, L., & Wolfman, W. (2020) · Climacteric · doi:10.1080/13697137.2020.1804547 · Cited by 297
The role of platelet-rich plasma in biomedicine: A comprehensive overview
Zhang, Z., Liu, P., Xue, X., Zhang, Z., Wang, L., Jiang, Y., Zhang, C., Zhou, H., Lv, S., Shen, W., et al. (2025) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111705 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Golezar, S., Ramezani Tehrani, F., Khazaei, S., Ebadi, A., & Keshavarz, Z.
- Venue
- Climacteric
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-03-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-411
- ISSN
- 1369-7137 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0804
- OpenAlex
- W2919421583
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.