CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24Political Philosophy and EthicsPolitical Theory and DemocracyInternational Relations and Foreign Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A realistic conception of politics: conflict, order and political realism

Burelli, Carlo·2021·Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
DOI 10.1080/13698230.2019.1604045
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper I unpack a realistic conception of politics by tightly defining its constitutive features: conflict and order. A conflict emerges when an actor is disposed to impose his/her views against the resistance of others. Conflicts are more problematic than moralists realize because they emerge unilaterally, are potentially violent, impermeable to content-based reason, and unavoidable. Order is then defined as an institutional framework that provides binding collective decisions. Order is deemed necessary because individuals need to cooperate to survive, but groups cannot spontaneously secure collective decisions and are prone to conflicts. Particularly, the fact that potentially violent conflicts emerge unilaterally means that order requires coercion. I conclude that mischaracterizing conflict and order leads to undesirable normative principles, and that this criticism can be leveraged not only against Rawlsian liberals who moralize conflicts away, but also against some agonists who underestimate the need for order and some communitarians who underplay both circumstances.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13698230.2019.1604045

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Aristotle, 1998, Politics
  2. Bartolini S., 2018, The political
  3. Gutmann A., 1985, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 14, 308
  4. Hobbes T., 1651, Leviathan
  5. Hobbes T., 1983, De Cive
  6. Machiavelli N., 1532, The prince
  7. MacIntyre A., 2013, After virtue
  8. Mouffe C., 2009, The democratic paradox
  9. Rawls J., 1993, Political liberalism
  10. Turchin P., 2016, Ultrasociety: How 10,000 years of war made humans the greatest cooperators on earth
  11. Weber M., 1919, The vocation lectures: ‘Science as a vocation’ & ‘politics as a vocation’
  12. Zuolo F., 2012, Handbook of political philosophy, 65

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Related

Metadata

Authors
Burelli, C.
Affiliations
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT)
Corresponding author
Burelli, Carlo
ORCID
Burelli, Carlo
Venue
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2019-05-04
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
977-999
ISSN
  • 1369-8230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-8772
DOI
10.1080/13698230.2019.1604045
OpenAlex
W2944597060
Cited by
24
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
12.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fondazione CRT (393)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
Keywords
political realism, political conflict, political order, coercion, group decision making, Rawlsian liberalism, agonistic behavior, communitarianism, cooperation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review