Cited by 380Cognitive Abilities and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentCognitive Functions and Memory

Improving digit span assessment of short-term verbal memory

Open access
Woods, David L., Kishiyama, Mark M., Yund, E. William, Herron, Timothy J., Edwards, Ben, Poliva, Oren, Hink, Robert F., Reed, Bruce·2011·Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Abstract

We measured digit span (DS) in two experiments that used computerized presentation of randomized auditory digits with performance-adapted list length adjustment. A new mean span (MS) metric of DS was developed that showed reduced variance, improved test-retest reliability, and higher correlations with the results of other neuropsychological test results when compared to traditional DS measures. The MS metric also enhanced the sensitivity of forward versus backward span comparisons, enabled the development of normative performance criteria with subdigit precision, and elucidated changes in DS performance with age and education level. Computerized stimulus delivery and improved scoring metrics significantly enhance the precision of DS assessments of short-term verbal memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13803395.2010.493149

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digit Span Test demonstrated very good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83).

    “The test demonstrated very good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83) [19].”

    From Enhancing Ecological Validity: Virtual Reality Assessment of Executive Functioning in Children and Adolescents with ADHD (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results: Experiment 1 section assesses digit-span test–retest reliability, and the Conclusions say the computerized measures can improve reliability (page numbers not provided). Neither passage reports Cronbach’s alpha or a value of 0.83, so the specific reliability statistic is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Simpson PM Wesnes KA Christmas L 1989 A computerised system for the assessment of drug-induced performance changes in young, elderly and demented populations British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 27 711 712P

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woods, D. L., Kishiyama, M. M., Yund, E. W., Herron, T. J., Edwards, B., Poliva, O., Hink, R. F., & Reed, B.
Affiliations
VA Northern California Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Woods, David L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
2010-08-02
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
101-111
ISSN
  • 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 1380-3395
  • 1744-411X
OpenAlex
W2025133725
Cited by
380
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES014038, R01ES019624, R01ES014038)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
digit span, verbal short-term memory, test-retest reliability, age and education effects
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Time Factors, Verbal Learning, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review