Improving digit span assessment of short-term verbal memory
Open accessAbstract
We measured digit span (DS) in two experiments that used computerized presentation of randomized auditory digits with performance-adapted list length adjustment. A new mean span (MS) metric of DS was developed that showed reduced variance, improved test-retest reliability, and higher correlations with the results of other neuropsychological test results when compared to traditional DS measures. The MS metric also enhanced the sensitivity of forward versus backward span comparisons, enabled the development of normative performance criteria with subdigit precision, and elucidated changes in DS performance with age and education level. Computerized stimulus delivery and improved scoring metrics significantly enhance the precision of DS assessments of short-term verbal memory.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digit Span Test demonstrated very good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83).
“The test demonstrated very good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83) [19].”
From Enhancing Ecological Validity: Virtual Reality Assessment of Executive Functioning in Children and Adolescents with ADHD (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
The Results: Experiment 1 section assesses digit-span test–retest reliability, and the Conclusions say the computerized measures can improve reliability (page numbers not provided). Neither passage reports Cronbach’s alpha or a value of 0.83, so the specific reliability statistic is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
(1995) · Cited by 2,809 · see citing works
Working memory and language: an overview
Baddeley, A. (2003) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0021-9924(03)00019-4 · Cited by 2,344 · see citing works
Benton, A. (1994) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.45.1.1 · Cited by 2,298 · see citing works
Killion, M. C., Niquette, P. A., Gudmundsen, G. I., et al. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1784440 · Cited by 847 · see citing works
Construct and Concurrent Validity of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised
Shapiro, A. M., Benedict, R. H. B., Schretlen, D. J., & Brandt, J. (1999) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1076/clin.13.3.348.1749 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Kramer, J. H., Jurik, J., Sha, S. J., Rankin, K., Rosen, H. J., Johnson, J. K., & Miller, B. L. (2003) · Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology · doi:10.1097/00146965-200312000-00002 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: a systematic review
Wild, K., Howieson, D., Webbe, F., Seelye, A., & Kaye, J. (2008) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2008.07.003 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Speed and memory in the WAIS-III Digit Symbol?Coding subtest across the adult lifespan
Joy, S. P. (2004) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2003.09.009 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Measures of Short-Term Memory: A Historical Review
Richardson, J. T. E. (2007) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70493-3 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Effect of age on forward and backward digit spans
Grégoire, J. C., & der Linden, M. V. (1997) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825589708256642 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Effects of increased processing demands on age differences in working memory.
Babcock, R. L., & Salthouse, T. A. (1990) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037//0882-7974.5.3.421 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Effect of age on forward and backward span tasks
HESTER, R. L., KINSELLA, G. J., & ONG, B. (2004) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617704104037 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Manna, C. B. G., Filangieri, C. M., Borod, J. C., Alterescu, K., & Bender, H. A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1110-2 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Integrative Neuroscience: The Role of a Standardized Database
Gordon, E., Cooper, N. R., RENNIE, C. J., Hermens, D. F., & Williams, L. M. (2005) · Clinical EEG and Neuroscience · doi:10.1177/155005940503600205 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Memory Span on the Wechsler Scales
Wilde, N. J., Strauss, E., & Tulsky, D. S. (2004) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390490496605 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Effects of increased processing demands on age differences in working memory.
Babcock, R. L., & Salthouse, T. A. (1990) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.421 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Computerized assessment in neuropsychology: A review of tests and test batteries
Kane, R. L., & Kay, G. G. (1992) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01108787 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Normal aging increases cognitive heterogeneity: Analysis of dispersion in WAIS-III scores across age
Ardila, A. (2007) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.004 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Ramsay, M. C., & Reynolds, C. R. (1995) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf02214760 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
The Visual Retention Test as a Constructional Praxis Task
Benton, A. L. (2007) · Confinia Neurologica · doi:10.1159/000104348 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Verbal and spatial memory spans in Alzheimer's and multi-infarct dementia
Carlesimo, G. A., Fadda, L., Lorusso, S., et al. (2009) · Acta Neurologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb01648.x · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Estimation of premorbid intelligence in dementia
O’Carroll, R. E., & Gilleard, C. J. (1986) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1986.tb00690.x · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Stress grouping improves performance on an immediate serial list recall task.
Reeves, C. K., Schmauder, A. R., & Morris, R. K. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1638 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Fließbach, K., Hoppe, C., Schlegel, U. S., Elger, C., & Helmstaedter, C. (2006) · Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie · doi:10.1055/s-2006-932162 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Silverman, M. J. (2007) · Journal of Music Therapy · doi:10.1093/jmt/44.4.415 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Short-Term Memory and Crystallized-Fluid Intelligence in Adulthood
Hayslip, B., & Kennelly, K. J. (1982) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/0164027582004003003 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Auditory and Visual Recall of Forward and Backward Digit Spans
Powell, D. H., & Hiatt, M. D. (1996) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1996.82.3c.1099 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
An investigation of premedication with morphine given by the buccal or intramuscular route.
Simpson, K., Tring, I., & Ellis, F. (1989) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.1989.tb05380.x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
A Naturalistic Prospective Study of the Use of Fluoxetine in General Psychiatric Outpatients
Mortimore, C., & Blacker, C. V. R. (1996) · Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1077(199609)11:5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Simpson PM Wesnes KA Christmas L 1989 A computerised system for the assessment of drug-induced performance changes in young, elderly and demented populations British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 27 711 712P
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time
Woods, D. L., Wyma, J. M., Yund, E. W., Herron, T. J., & Reed, B. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00131 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
“…assessment that included four other tests from the California Cognitive Assessment Battery (CCAB): finger tapping (Hubel et al., 2013a,b), CRT in a visual feature conjunction task (Woods et al., 2015), digit span (Woods et al., 2011a,b), and an adaptive Paced Auditory Serial Addition test.”
MethodSelf-citationDuchowski, A. T., Krejtz, K., Krejtz, I., Biele, C., Niedzielska, A., Kiefer, P., Raubal, M., & Giannopoulos, I. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173856 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Gut memories: Towards a cognitive neurobiology of irritable bowel syndrome
Kennedy, P. J., Clarke, G., Quigley, E. M. M., Groeger, J. A., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.001 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Thomas, A. G., Dennis, A., Rawlings, N. B., Stagg, C. J., Matthews, L., Morris, M., Kolind, S. H., Foxley, S., Jenkinson, M., Nichols, T. E., et al. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.090 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
“All tasks were administered using paper and pencil except for the digit span test which was administered by computer using the PEBL software package (Mueller and Piper, 2014) in a stepwise fashion as described in Woods et al. (2010).”
MethodAge-related slowing of response selection and production in a visual choice reaction time task
Woods, D. L., Wyma, J. M., Yund, E. W., Herron, T. J., & Reed, B. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00193 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“CRT testing required approximately 5 min, and occurred midway through a 30-min computerized test battery that included, in order, tests of finger tapping (Hubel et al., 2013a,b), SRT (Woods et al., 2015), CRT, digit span (Woods et al., 2011a,b), and paced auditory serial addition.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationWells, E. L., Kofler, M. J., Soto, E. F., Schaefer, H. S., & Sarver, D. E. (2018) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2017.10.024 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“This approach has been criticized for providing a relatively narrow range of scores (Tarle et al., 2017; Woods et al., 2011), such that score variability comes primarily from the shortest list-lengths because longer list-lengths are not routinely administered (Conway et al.”
Computerized measures of finger tapping: effects of hand dominance, age, and sex.
Hubel, K. A., Reed, B., Yund, E. W., Herron, T. J., & Woods, D. L. (2013) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/25.29.pms.116.3.929-952 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationApplying novel technologies and methods to inform the ontology of self-regulation
Eisenberg, I. W., Bissett, P. G., Canning, J. R., Dallery, J., Enkavi, A. Z., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Gonzalez, O., Green, A. I., Greene, M. A., Kiernan, M., et al. (2018) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2017.09.014 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Snow, N. J., Wadden, K. P., Chaves, A. R., & Ploughman, M. (2019) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2019/6430596 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Moseley, P., Aleman, A., Allen, P., Bell, V., Bless, J., Bortolon, C., Cella, M., Garrison, J., Hugdahl, K., Kozáková, E., et al. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620985832 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Dolder, P. C., Strajhar, P., Vizeli, P., Odermatt, A., & Liechti, M. E. (2018) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-018-4849-0 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Romero-Ayuso, D., del Pino-González, A., Torres-Jiménez, A., Juan-González, J., Celdrán, F. J., Franchella, M. C., Ortega-López, N., Triviño-Juárez, J. M., Garach-Gómez, A., Arrabal-Fernández, L., et al. (2024) · Children · doi:10.3390/children11080986 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“The test demonstrated very good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83) [19].”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Woods, D. L., Kishiyama, M. M., Yund, E. W., Herron, T. J., Edwards, B., Poliva, O., Hink, R. F., & Reed, B.
- Affiliations
- VA Northern California Health Care System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Woods, David L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-08-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-111
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 1380-3395
- 1744-411X
- PMC
- PMC2978794
- OpenAlex
- W2025133725
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES014038, R01ES019624, R01ES014038)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- digit span, verbal short-term memory, test-retest reliability, age and education effects
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Time Factors, Verbal Learning, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review