Cited by 597Cognitive Abilities and TestingMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities.

Unsworth, Nash, Engle, Randall W.·2007·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Research has suggested that short-term memory and working memory (as measured by simple and complex span tasks, respectively) are separate constructs that are differentially related to higher order cognitive abilities. This claim is critically evaluated by reviewing research that has compared simple and complex span tasks in both experimental and correlational studies. In addition, a meta-analysis and re-analyses of key data sets were conducted. The review and analyses suggest that simple and complex span tasks largely measure the same basic subcomponent processes (e.g., rehearsal, maintenance, updating, controlled search) but differ in the extent to which these processes operate in a particular task. These differences largely depend on the extent to which phonological processes are maximized and variability from long list lengths is present. Potential methodological, psychometric, and assessment implications are discussed and a theoretical account of the data is proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.1038

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simple and complex spans can be considered measures of the same cognitive processes.

    “it has been argued that simple and complex spans (the latter ones being included both in previous metaanalyses and the present one) can in fact be considered as measures of the same cognitive processes (Unsworth & Engle, 2007).”
  • The measures used in prior studies might not be sensitive enough to detect small changes induced by experimental manipulations in young, healthy subjects.

    “These measures might not be sensitive enough to detect small changes induced by experimental manipulations in young, healthy subjects [38], [39], [40].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2007
Volume
133
Issue
6
Pages
1038-1066
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2103685082
Cited by
597
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 35
FWCI
36.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
short-term memory, working memory, complex span, rehearsal, maintenance, updating, phonological processes, list length
MeSH terms
Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Phonetics, Retention, Psychology, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review