Cited by 46Hallucinations in medical conditionsSchizophrenia research and treatmentParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

Correlates of hallucinatory experiences in the general population: an international multisite replication study

Open access
Moseley, Peter, Aleman, André, Allen, Paul, Bell, Vaughan, Bless, Josef, Bortolon, Catherine, Cella, Matteo, Garrison, Jane +12 more·2021·Psychological Science

Abstract

Hallucinatory experiences can occur in both clinical and nonclinical groups. However, in previous studies of the general population, investigations of the cognitive mechanisms underlying hallucinatory experiences have yielded inconsistent results. We ran a large-scale preregistered multisite study, in which general-population participants ( N = 1,394 across 11 data-collection sites and online) completed assessments of hallucinatory experiences, a measure of adverse childhood experiences, and four tasks: source memory, dichotic listening, backward digit span, and auditory signal detection. We found that hallucinatory experiences were associated with a higher false-alarm rate on the signal detection task and a greater number of reported adverse childhood experiences but not with any of the other cognitive measures employed. These findings are an important step in improving reproducibility in hallucinations research and suggest that the replicability of some findings regarding cognition in clinical samples needs to be investigated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797620985832

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moseley, P., Aleman, A., Allen, P., Bell, V., Bless, J., Bortolon, C., Cella, M., Garrison, J., Hugdahl, K., Kozáková, E., Larøi, F., Moffatt, J., Say, N., Smailes, D., Suzuki, M., Toh, W. L., Woodward, T., Zaytseva, Y., Rossell, S., & Fernyhough, C.
Affiliations
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Psychologie: Personnalité, Cognition, Changement Social (FR)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
  • Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Moseley, Peter
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2021-06-04
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
1024-1037
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W3049155646
Cited by
46
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (108720/Z/15/Z, WT 108720)
  • Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky (17-32957A, LO1611, AZV 17-32957A)
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • Medical Research Council (GNT1154651, GNT1060664)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1161609, 1154651, 1060664)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (LO1611)
  • H2020 European Research Council (693124)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
hallucinations, general population, adverse childhood experiences, source memory, dichotic listening, backward digit span, auditory signal detection, false alarm rate, replication
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Cognition, Hallucinations, Humans, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review