Cited by 24Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Neuropsychological functioning of combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder and mild traumatic brain injury

Soble, Jason R., Spanierman, Lisa B., Fitzgerald Smith, Julie·2013·Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Abstract

This study examined the neuropsychological performance of 125 outpatient Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and nonacute mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) (n = 66) and PTSD (n = 59) across multiple cognitive domains to determine whether mild TBI results in greater impairment among those with PTSD. Profile analyses revealed that veterans with PTSD and mild TBI did not differ significantly from those with just PTSD across domains, suggesting that comorbid mild TBI does not result in an additive effect. A norms-based comparison also revealed that neither group demonstrated impaired performance on any of the objective neuropsychological measures examined. However, both groups endorsed moderately elevated symptoms of depression and anxiety, indicating that comorbid psychopathology may contribute to subjective cognitive complaints.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13803395.2013.798398

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most individuals with remote mTBI(s) do not have objective cognitive deficits that might explain their self-reported cognitive difficulties.

    “Our new findings add to mounting evidence that most individuals with remote mTBI(s) do not have objective cognitive deficits that might explain their self-reported cognitive difficulties (Soble et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soble, J. R., Spanierman, L. B., & Fitzgerald Smith, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Soble, Jason R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
2013-06
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
551-561
ISSN
  • 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 1380-3395
  • 1744-411X
OpenAlex
W2143420967
Cited by
24
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, mild traumatic brain injury, combat veterans, neuropsychological performance, cognitive impairment, comorbidities, subjective cognitive complaints, depression, anxiety, Operation Enduring Freedom, Iraq War
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Mental Disorders, Brain Injuries, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Combat Disorders, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Nervous System Diseases, Neuropsychological Tests, Outpatients, Psychomotor Performance, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Unconsciousness, Veterans, Iraq War, 2003-2011, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review