Cited by 6Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchOccupational Health and Performance

The Link between Deployment-Related Injuries and Suicidal Thinking in the Army National Guard: Examining the Role of Perceived Burdensomeness and Hopelessness

Open access
Pardue-Bourgeois, Sarah, Goldberg, Simon B., Wyman, Mary F., Abbas, Maleeha, Flynn, Anthony W. P., Domínguez, Sergio, Tucker, Raymond P.·2024·Archives of Suicide Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2020, Army National Guard members demonstrated greater risk of suicide than their military and civilian counterparts. Though literature on deployment-related experiences and suicidal ideation (SI) is mixed, investigations of specific deployment-related experiences (e.g., injuries) may further elucidate the relationship between deployment and suicide risk. Deployment-related injuries, including pain severity and functional impairment, have been linked to increased risk of SI, and correlates like perceived burdensomeness (PB) and hopelessness. The current study sought to examine the cross-sectional relationship between deployment-related injuries, including pain severity and functional impairment, and severity of SI through PB and hopelessness. METHOD: = 2,261) completed validated self-report measures on past-week SI, PB, hopelessness, and single items regarding injury sustained during deployment and associated functional impairment and pain severity. RESULTS: = .1993), functional impairment was related to SI through PB, and pain severity was related to SI through PB. Contrary to hypotheses, hopelessness was not associated with SI when PB was simultaneously considered. CONCLUSIONS: Army National Guard members who develop a sense of PB related to their injury and functional impairment of that injury may be at increased risk for suicidal ideation. Military suicide-prevention efforts may be potentiated through targeting distorted cognitions such as PB and hopelessness, especially in service members who have been injured.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13811118.2023.2270667

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Affective disorders in combat veterans significantly affect cognitive processing and behavioral responses, reducing quality of life, ability to socialize, and capacity for professional activities.

    “This group of psychopathological manifestations significantly affects cognitive processing and behavioral responses, thereby reducing the quality of life of veterans, their ability to socialize, and their capacity to engage in professional activities [7, 8].”

    From An individualized approach to the treatment of affective disorders in the comorbidity of post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says deployment-related functional impairment may lead to social and occupational difficulties and distorted cognitive perceptions. It does not establish that affective disorders in combat veterans significantly alter cognitive processing and behavior or reduce quality of life; its proposed direction is from injury-related impairment toward those difficulties and perceptions. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bryan CJ, Griffith JE, Pace BT, Hinkson K, Bryan AO, Clemans TA, & Imel ZE (2015). Combat exposure and risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 45(5), 633-649. doi: 10.1111/sltb/12163 [PubMed: 29889337] · DOI
  2. Bryan CJ, & Rudd MD (2018). Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for suicide prevention. Guilford Press.
  3. Joiner TE (2005). Why people die by suicide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pardue-Bourgeois, S., Goldberg, S. B., Wyman, M. F., Abbas, M., Flynn, A. W. P., Domínguez, S., & Tucker, R. P.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Pardue-Bourgeois, Sarah
Venue
Archives of Suicide Research
Published
2023-10-26
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
1107-1118
ISSN
  • 1381-1118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-6136
OpenAlex
W4387949469
Cited by
6
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Suicide Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health of the National Institutes of Health (K23AT010879, IK2 HX003080)
  • Dept of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Service, VA Office of Research & Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
suicidal ideation, Army National Guard, perceived burdensomeness, hopelessness, pain intensity, functional disability, cognitive distortions
MeSH terms
Military Deployment, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Pain, Risk Factors, United States, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation, Hope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review