Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 578

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The betula prospective cohort study: Memory, health, and aging

Nilsson, Lars-GÖRan, BÄCkman, Lars, Erngrund, Karin, Nyberg, Lars, Adolfsson, Rolf, Bucht, GÖSta, Karlsson, Stig, Widing, Maud, Winblad, Bengt·1997·Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition

Abstract

The objective of this article is to present an overview of a prospective cohort study involving a total of 3,000 subjects whose ages were 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, and 80 years when first tested. the design of the study includes three waves of data collection. the first of these waves was conducted in 1988-1990, the second in 1993-1995, and the third will be conducted in 1998-2000. One sample of 1,000 subjects in these age cohorts underwent testing in 1988-1990 (100 subjects per cohort). This sample and two additional samples were tested in 1993-1995 and will be tested again in 1998-2000. Subjects take part in extensive health and memory examinations, and interviews about social factors. the memory testing covers a wide range of memory functions. the chief objectives of the study are to (a) examine the development of health and memory in adulthood and old age; (b) determine early preclinical signs of dementia; (c) determine risk factors for dementia; and (d) assess premorbid memory function in subjects who are in accidents or acquire diseases during the course of the study. Cross-sectional data from the first sample show a continuous age-related deterioration in tasks assessing episodic memory, no age-related deficit in semantic memory tasks when educational level is partialed out, and no age effects in priming. Finally, the relationships between subjective (i.e., self-rating) and objective (blood and urine parameters, blood pressure and pulse, medication, recent contacts with a physician, and sensory function) indexes of health, on the one hand, and memory performance, on the other, were in general relatively weak in all age groups. the health-memory relationship was completely mediated by age, whereas the age-memory relationship was only partially mediated by health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13825589708256633

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Cited by

See all 578

Metadata

Authors
Nilsson, L.-G., BÄCkman, L., Erngrund, K., Nyberg, L., Adolfsson, R., Bucht, G., Karlsson, S., Widing, M., & Winblad, B.
Venue
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
Published
1997-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
1-32
ISSN
  • 0928-9917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1382-5585
  • 1744-4128
OpenAlex
W1987690347
Cited by
578
References
85
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The betula prospective cohort study: Memory, health, and aging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13825589708256633
The paper
Nilsson, L.-G., BÄCkman, L., Erngrund, K., Nyberg, L., Adolfsson, R., Bucht, G., Karlsson, S., Widing, M., & Winblad, B. (1997). The betula prospective cohort study: Memory, health, and aging. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825589708256633

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.