Cited by 45Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Executive Functioning and Observed Versus Self-Reported Measures of Functional Ability

Mitchell, Meghan, Miller, L. Stephen·2008·The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between measures of executive functioning and both observed and self-reported functional ability. It was hypothesized that performance on a direct assessment of functional ability would have a stronger correlation with performance on measures of executive functioning than a self-report measure of functional ability. Results supported the hypothesis, indicating that self-report measures may not be sensitive to early decline in functional ability. Results also provide evidence to support the use of measures of executive functioning to detect early decline in functional ability that otherwise may not be detected by the typical self-report measures used in clinical settings. While lack of insight into functional deficits has been demonstrated in the literature in older adults with dementia, this study demonstrated lack of insight in a non-demented, community dwelling sample of older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13854040701336436

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, M., & Miller, L. S.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, Meghan
Venue
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Published
2008-05-09
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
471-479
ISSN
  • 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1385-4046
  • 1744-4144
OpenAlex
W2061134590
Cited by
45
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Clinical Neuropsychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Georgia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
executive function, functional capacity, self-report measures, lack of insight, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, dementia
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Geriatric Assessment, Observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review