Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Integrated Review of Recovery after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI): Implications for Clinical Management

McCrea, Michael, Iverson, Grant L., McAllister, Thomas W., Hammeke, Thomas A., Powell, Matthew R., Barr, William B., Kelly, James P.·2009·The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Abstract

The diagnosis and treatment of mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI)have historically been hampered by an incomplete base of scientific evidence to guide clinicians. One question has been most elusive to clinicians and researchers alike: What is the true natural history of MTBI? Fortunately, the science of MTBI has advanced more in the last decade than in the previous 50 years, and now reaches a maturity point at which the science can drive an evidence-based approach to clinical management. In particular, technological advances in functional neuroimaging have created a powerful bridge between the clinical and basic science of MTBI in humans. Collectively, findings from clinical, basic science, and functional neuroimaging studies now establish a foundation on which to build integrative theories and testable hypotheses around a comprehensive model of MTBI recovery. We review the current scientific literature on postconcussion symptom recovery, neuropsychological outcome, and neurophysiological healing after MTBI. Special emphasis is placed on how the new evidence base can help guide clinicians in the evaluation and management of military-related MTBI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13854040903074652

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 97 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Arfanakis K, 2002, AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology, 23, 794
  2. Barth JT, 1989, Mild head injury, 257
  3. Barth JT, 2001, Journal of Athletic Training, 36, 253
  4. Binder LM, 1997, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 421, 10.1080/01688639708403870 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Dikmen S, 1995, Neuropsychology, 9, 80, 10.1037/0894-4105.9.1.80 · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.9.1.80 · Paper page
  6. Giza CC, 2001, Journal of Athletic Training, 36, 228
  7. Iverson GL, 2007, Brain injury medicine: Principles and practice, 333
  8. Iverson GL, 2007, Brain injury medicine: Principles and practice, 373
  9. Jantzen KJ, 2004, AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology, 25, 738
  10. Lidvall HF, 1974, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 50, 64
  11. McGowan JC, 2000, AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology, 21, 875
  12. Ponsford J, 2006, Current Opinions in Neurology, 18, 692, 10.1097/01.wco.0000186840.61431.44 · doi:10.1097/01.wco.0000186840.61431.44
  13. Riemann BL, 2002, Journal of Athletic Training, 35, 19
  14. Vickery CD, 2001, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 45
  15. Williams DH, 1990, Neurosurgery, 27, 422, 10.1227/00006123-199009000-00014 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
McCrea, M., Iverson, G. L., McAllister, T. W., Hammeke, T. A., Powell, M. R., Barr, W. B., & Kelly, J. P.
Venue
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Published
2009-10-29
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
1368-1390
ISSN
  • 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1385-4046
  • 1744-4144
OpenAlex
W2115433360
Cited by
417
References
97
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Integrated Review of Recovery after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI): Implications for Clinical Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13854040903074652
The paper
McCrea, M., Iverson, G. L., McAllister, T. W., Hammeke, T. A., Powell, M. R., Barr, W. B., & Kelly, J. P. (2009). An Integrated Review of Recovery after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI): Implications for Clinical Management. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040903074652

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.