Cited by 94Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Practice Effects: A Unique Cognitive Variable

Duff, Kevin, Callister, Catherine, Dennett, Kathryn, Tometich, Danielle·2012·The Clinical Neuropsychologist

Abstract

Practice effects are improvements in cognitive test performance due to repeated evaluation with the same or similar test materials. Prior studies have reported that these improvements can vary with age, education/intellect, and disease status. However, additional information is needed about variables that influence practice effects. The current study prospectively quantified short-term practice effects in 268 community-dwelling older adults and compared these practice effects to demographic variables, global cognition, premorbid intellect, depression, and individual cognitive domains. Overall, practice effects were not significantly related to most demographic and clinical characteristics or individual cognitive domains, which was contrary to our hypotheses. However, since practice effects appear to be uninfluenced by many variables that typically affect cognitive scores, they may be a unique and valuable tool that could be applied in a number of diverse patient groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13854046.2012.722685

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duff, K., Callister, C., Dennett, K., & Tometich, D.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Duff, Kevin
Venue
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Published
2012-10
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1117-1127
ISSN
  • 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1385-4046
  • 1744-4144
OpenAlex
W2068605110
Cited by
94
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Clinical Neuropsychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
practice effects, cognitive test performance, older adults, global cognition, depression, cognitive domain, demographic factors, cognitive assessment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Psychomotor Performance, Time Factors, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review