Cited by 80Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Wearable technology for high-frequency cognitive and mood assessment in major depressive disorder: longitudinal observational study

Open access
Cormack, Francesca, McCue, Maggie, Taptiklis, Nick, Skirrow, Caroline, Glazer, Emilie, Panagopoulos, Elli, van Schaik, Tempest A, Fehnert, Ben +2 more·2019·JMIR Mental Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Cognitive symptoms are common in major depressive disorder and may help to identify patients who need treatment or who are not experiencing adequate treatment response. Digital tools providing real-time data assessing cognitive function could help support patient treatment and remediation of cognitive and mood symptoms. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine feasibility and validity of a wearable high-frequency cognitive and mood assessment app over 6 weeks, corresponding to when antidepressant pharmacotherapy begins to show efficacy. Methods: A total of 30 patients (aged 19-63 years; 19 women) with mild-to-moderate depression participated in the study. The new Cognition Kit app was delivered via the Apple Watch, providing a high-resolution touch screen display for task presentation and logging responses. Cognition was assessed by the n-back task up to 3 times daily and depressed mood by 3 short questions once daily. Adherence was defined as participants completing at least 1 assessment daily. Selected tests sensitive to depression from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery and validated questionnaires of depression symptom severity were administered on 3 occasions (weeks 1, 3, and 6). Exploratory analyses examined the relationship between mood and cognitive measures acquired in low- and high-frequency assessment. Results: Adherence was excellent for mood and cognitive assessments (95% and 96%, respectively), did not deteriorate over time, and was not influenced by depression symptom severity or cognitive function at study onset. Analyses examining the relationship between high-frequency cognitive and mood assessment and validated measures showed good correspondence. Daily mood assessments correlated moderately with validated depression questionnaires (r=0.45-0.69 for total daily mood score), and daily cognitive assessments correlated moderately with validated cognitive tests sensitive to depression (r=0.37-0.50 for mean n-back). Conclusions: This study supports the feasibility and validity of high-frequency assessment of cognition and mood using wearable devices over an extended period in patients with major depressive disorder.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 30 adults with mild-to-moderate major depressive disorder, a wearable Apple Watch app delivered high-frequency n-back cognitive and mood assessments over 6 weeks with high adherence and moderate correlations with validated measures. The authors conclude that wearable high-frequency assessment of cognition and mood is feasible and valid in this population.

Key findings

  • Adherence was high: cognitive assessments were completed on 95.63% (SD 9.28) of days and mood assessments on 94.60% (SD 9.73) of days overall; 21/30 participants had full cognitive adherence and 15/30 had full mood adherence. Adherence did not deteriorate over time and was not predicted by baseline depression symptom severity or cognitive function.
  • Daily mood assessments correlated moderately with validated questionnaires: total daily mood correlated with PHQ-9 at r=0.69, PDQ-D at r=0.65, and UCLA-LS at r=0.45; the abstract reports r=0.45-0.69 for total daily mood.
  • Daily n-back performance correlated moderately with validated cognitive tests: mean dprime correlated with SWM between errors at r=−0.46, SWM strategy at r=−0.37, RVP A′ at r=0.50, and RVP median latency at r=−0.42; the abstract reports r=0.37-0.50 for mean n-back.
  • N-back performance improved over time, best fit by a cubic model (BIC=1298.05; likelihood ratio=10.36; P=.001), while mood showed a modest linear improvement (fixed effect of study day=−0.0026, P=.01) with heterogeneous individual trajectories.

Methods

  • Longitudinal observational feasibility and validity study of 30 patients aged 19-63 years (19 women) with mild-to-moderate MDD (PHQ-9 5-15) on antidepressant monotherapy; participants used an Apple Watch app for 6 weeks.
  • Cognitive function was assessed with an n-back task up to 3 times daily, and mood with 3 short questions once daily; full-length CANTAB cognitive tests and validated questionnaires (PHQ-9, PDQ-D, UCLA-LS) were administered at weeks 1, 3, and 6.
  • Analyses included adherence summaries, logistic mixed models for adherence over time, longitudinal mixed-effects models for daily cognition and mood, multilevel reliability for mood items, and correlations between daily and full-length measures.

Limitations

  • Stated: the study included volunteers with mild-to-moderate MDD, so generalizability to other severity levels or less motivated patients is unclear; small touch-screen assessment may not suit visual impairments or those needing larger typeface; step counts from Apple Watch and iPhone were discrepant, undermining activity-data reliability; heart rate measurement issues were noted, including a biologically implausible minimum of 22 bpm, and caution is required for scientific heart-rate research.
  • Evident: the sample was small (n=30) and there was no control or comparison group; exploratory analyses did not correct for multiple comparisons; adherence may have been supported by study-center contact and reminders, and the 6-week duration does not establish longer-term feasibility.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/12814

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 55 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Adherence was not influenced by cognitive function at study onset.

    “Adherence was excellent for mood and cognitive assessments (95% and 96%, respectively), did not deteriorate over time, and was not influenced by depression symptom severity or cognitive function at study onset.”
    • Also stated in: § Adherence · plain
      “Adherence was not significantly correlated with any CANTAB measures at week 1 (maximum rho=0.15; P=.44).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Adherence was not influenced by depression symptom severity at study onset.

    “Adherence was excellent for mood and cognitive assessments (95% and 96%, respectively), did not deteriorate over time, and was not influenced by depression symptom severity or cognitive function at study onset.”
    • Also stated in: § Adherence · boosted
      “Logistic regression confirmed that self-reported depressive symptoms, assessed by the PHQ-9, PDQ-D, and UCLA-LS, were not associated with level of adherence in mood or cognitive assessments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Adherence did not deteriorate over time.

    “Adherence was excellent for mood and cognitive assessments (95% and 96%, respectively), did not deteriorate over time, and was not influenced by depression symptom severity or cognitive function at study onset.”
    • Also stated in: § Adherence · plain
      “However, logistic mixed modeling showed no deterioration in adherence (ie, responding at least once daily) over time for assessments of mood, cognition, or activity.”
    • Also stated in: § Adherence · plain
      “Adherence, defined as engaging with cognitive and mood assessments at least once daily, was very high (95%-96%), did not deteriorate over time, and was not predicted by depressive symptoms or cognitive function at study onset.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Adherence to mood and cognitive assessments was excellent (95% and 96%, respectively).

    “Adherence was excellent for mood and cognitive assessments (95% and 96%, respectively), did not deteriorate over time, and was not influenced by depression symptom severity or cognitive function at study onset.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Daily mood assessments correlated moderately with validated depression questionnaires (r=0.45-0.69 for total daily mood score).

    “Daily mood assessments correlated moderately with validated depression questionnaires (r=0.45-0.69 for total daily mood score), and daily cognitive assessments correlated moderately with validated cognitive tests sensitive to depression (r=0.37-0.50 for mean n-back).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 29
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants reported that completing assessments was easier when study sessions fit into their daily routines, and that periods of high and low mood affected their motivation to complete assessments.

    “Participants reported that completing assessments was easier when study sessions fit into their daily routines, and that periods of high and low mood affected their motivation to complete assessments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Adherence was affected by technical problems for some participants and by forgetting to wear the Apple Watch due to low mood or bereavement.

    “Adherence was also affected by technical problems for some participants, and by forgetting to wear the Apple Watch because of low mood or bereavement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Because of a technical issue on the final study day, the evening session was not administered, resulting in lower adherence on day 42.

    “Because of a technical issue on the final study day, the evening session was not administered, resulting in lower adherence on day 42.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Correlations were highest for the PHQ-9, which also showed the highest item overlap with high-frequency assessments.

    “Correlations were highest for the PHQ-9, a scale designed as both a diagnostic instrument and a severity measure [34], which also showed the highest item overlap with high-frequency assessments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Correlations between n-back performance and daily reported cognitive symptoms, and all correlations with dprime slope, were nonsignificant (P=.12-.79).

    “Correlations between n-back performance and daily reported cognitive symptoms and all correlations with dprime slope were nonsignificant (P=.12-.79).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Heart rate measurement using the Apple Watch had measurement issues, including a minimum registered heart rate of 22 bpm, which was not biologically plausible.

    “Measurement issues were noted for heart rate using the Apple Watch, with individual heart rates registered including a minimum of 22 beats per minute, which was not biologically plausible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants with better performance on CANTAB showed higher intercept and better mean performance on the n-back.

    “Participants with better performance on CANTAB showed higher intercept and better mean performance on the n-back.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Multilevel analysis of dprime score by study day confirmed a better fit for a cubic term rather than quadratic or linear models, indicating an initial rapid improvement in performance followed by a plateau.

    “Multilevel analysis of dprime score by study day confirmed a better fit for a cubic term rather than quadratic or linear models (Bayesian information criterion=1298.05; likelihood ratio=10.36; P=.001), indicating an initial rapid improvement in performance followed by a plateau.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Periods of low adherence tended to cluster temporally.

    “Periods of low adherence tended to cluster temporally (Multimedia Appendix 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Overall, mood symptoms showed a modest concurrent improvement, with great heterogeneity in the trajectories observed over the assessment period.

    “Overall, mood symptoms showed a modest concurrent improvement, albeit with great heterogeneity in the trajectories observed over the assessment period.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No significant correlations were seen with PDQ-D or UCLA-LS, or dprime slope.

    “No significant correlations were seen with PDQ-D or UCLA-LS, or dprime slope.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SWM between errors and strategy showed moderate correlations with daily reported mood, whereas RVP outcome measures were nonsignificant.

    “Examining the relationship between daily mood assessment and CANTAB measures, SWM between errors and strategy showed moderate correlations with daily reported mood, whereas correlations with RVP outcome measures were nonsignificant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Participants were stabilized on monotherapy at the time of assessment, and many had started their current treatment many months before study participation (9.9 months on average).

    “Participants were stabilized on monotherapy at the time of assessment, and many had started their current treatment many months before study participation (9.9 months on average).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Step counts registered on the two devices had a moderate correlation (rho=0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.65; P<.001), with instances of marked discrepancy.

    “A moderate correlation was seen between step counts registered on the 2 devices (rho=0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.65; P<.001), but there were also instances of marked discrepancy (Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PDQ-D scores correlated with daily mood assessments but not with cognitive performance.

    “PDQ-D scores were correlated with daily mood assessments but not with cognitive performance, indicating that self-reported cognitive function cannot substitute for objective assessments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mood trajectories were highly heterogeneous and showed no clear relationship with change in cognitive performance.

    “The trajectory of moods reported by patients during the course of the study was highly heterogeneous, showing no clear relationship with change in cognitive performance (Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Research has highlighted discrepancies between objectively measured cognitive function and patients' self-report from questionnaires, with the latter being affected by depressed mood.

    “Research has highlighted discrepancies between objectively measured cognitive function and patients’ self-report from questionnaires, with the latter being affected by depressed mood [15,24,25].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Cognitive symptoms, including difficulty concentrating or making decisions, are features of major depressive disorder.

    “Cognitive symptoms, including difficulty concentrating or making decisions, are features of MDD [3] that may offer a target for intervention [4].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] 2013, DSM-5 Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cognitive symptoms have been associated with poor occupational functioning and unemployment, work-related disability, and adverse psychosocial outcomes.

    “Cognitive symptoms have also been associated with poor occupational functioning [18] and unemployment [19], work-related disability, and adverse psychosocial outcomes [20-22].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [18] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [20] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Cognitive symptoms of major depressive disorder include deficits in several domains, including processing speed, attention, executive function, learning, and memory.

    “Cognitive symptoms of MDD include deficits in several domains, including processing speed, attention, executive function, learning, and memory [5-7].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [5] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mobile digital technologies allow for sampling outside of the clinic and in the patient's home or work environment, providing a shared platform for clinicians and patients to monitor symptoms.

    “Mobile digital technologies allow for sampling outside of the clinic and in the patient’s home or work environment, providing a shared platform for clinicians and patients to monitor symptoms [26].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The PHQ-2 is a validated brief form of the PHQ-9.

    “Mood was assessed with 2 questions adapted from the PHQ-2, a validated brief form of the PHQ-9, which assesses only low mood and loss of interest or pleasure and is sensitive to depression and suitable for brief assessments [36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The brevity of the current protocol in conjunction with the proximity to wearable assessments may have helped to support the high levels of compliance seen here.

    “The brevity of the current protocol in conjunction with the proximity to wearable assessments may have helped to support the high levels of compliance seen here.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Previous studies in patients with mood disorders have shown good overall feasibility and acceptability of high-frequency assessments, although there is likely to be an interaction between protocol burden and burden of illness.

    “Previous studies in patients with mood disorders have shown good overall feasibility and acceptability of high-frequency assessments, although there is likely to be an interaction between protocol burden and burden of illness [46].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The three daily mood items showed overall good reliability indices, supporting their combined use.

    “The 3 mood items showed overall good reliability indices, supporting the combined use of the 3 question items.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To reduce multiple comparisons, overall scores from self-report questionnaires and CANTAB cognitive testing were calculated by taking the mean of outcome measures obtained at weeks 1, 3, and 6.

    “To reduce multiple comparisons, overall scores from self-report questionnaires and CANTAB cognitive testing were calculated by taking the mean of outcome measures obtained at weeks 1, 3, and 6.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression (PDQ-D) is a measure that assesses subjective cognitive dysfunction in depression.

    “One additional item assessing self-perceived concentration was taken from the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire—Depression (PDQ-D) [37,38], a measure that assesses subjective cognitive dysfunction in depression.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [37] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [38] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was reviewed and approved by the Proportionate Review Sub-Committee of the Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 at Swansea University (REC reference: 17/WA/0042) and performed in accordance with the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki.

    “The study was reviewed and approved by the Proportionate Review Sub-Committee of the Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 at Swansea University (REC reference: 17/WA/0042) and performed in accordance with the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Normality of summary measures and data was assessed with visual examination and the Shapiro-Wilk test before further analysis.

    “Normality of all summary measures was assessed with visual examination of the data and with the Shapiro-Wilk test before further analysis.”
    • Also stated in: § Statistical Analysis · plain
      “Normality of data was assessed with visual examination of the data and with the Shapiro-Wilk test before further analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    As this was an exploratory study, no corrections for multiple comparisons were made.

    “As this was an exploratory study, no corrections for multiple comparisons were made.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Assumptions of logistic regression models were investigated by examining the distribution and patterns of residuals versus fitted values.

    “Assumptions of logistic regression models were investigated by examining the distribution and patterns of residuals versus fitted values.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The capacity to improve performance is not directly affected by either depressive symptoms or cognitive impairment.

    “This suggests that the capacity to improve performance is not directly affected by either depressive symptoms or cognitive impairment, consistent with research in a previous study showing that practice effects in cognitive tasks were not moderated by depressive symptomatology [50].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Studies exploring gamification show that the use of game design elements (eg, points and scoreboards) can improve motivation.

    “This finding is supported by studies exploring gamification of tasks, where the use of game design elements (eg, points and scoreboards) can improve motivation [47,48].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [47] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The n-back paradigm activates a network of frontoparietal areas.

    “The n-back paradigm is commonly used alongside functional neuroimaging, where it activates a network of frontoparietal areas [51].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This study was significantly longer in duration than most previous high-frequency assessment studies, spanning 6 weeks rather than the typical 1- to 2-week duration, and the daily frequency of assessment was lower, with most other studies typically sampling 5 to 10 times per day.

    “However, it is notable that although this study was significantly longer in duration than most previous high-frequency assessment studies, spanning 6 weeks rather than the typical 1- to 2-week duration, the daily frequency of assessment was lower, with most other studies typically sampling 5 to 10 times per day [45].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    No corrections for missing data and no other adjustments to raw data were made.

    “No corrections for missing data and no other adjustments to raw data were made.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Mobile apps have been used as part of randomized controlled trials to evaluate treatment efficacy.

    “In depression, mobile apps have tracked changes in patient-reported mood [27-29] and have been used as part of randomized controlled trials to evaluate treatment efficacy [30].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In depression, mobile apps have tracked changes in patient-reported mood.

    “In depression, mobile apps have tracked changes in patient-reported mood [27-29] and have been used as part of randomized controlled trials to evaluate treatment efficacy [30].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [27] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [28] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The PHQ-2 is sensitive to depression and suitable for brief assessments.

    “Mood was assessed with 2 questions adapted from the PHQ-2, a validated brief form of the PHQ-9, which assesses only low mood and loss of interest or pleasure and is sensitive to depression and suitable for brief assessments [36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A sample size of 30 provides 80% power to detect correlations of r=0.5.

    “This sample size also provides 80% power to detect correlations of r=0.5.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All participants provided written informed consent before enrollment.

    “All participants provided written informed consent before enrollment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The PHQ-2 assesses only low mood and loss of interest or pleasure.

    “Mood was assessed with 2 questions adapted from the PHQ-2, a validated brief form of the PHQ-9, which assesses only low mood and loss of interest or pleasure and is sensitive to depression and suitable for brief assessments [36].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Striking a balance between difficulty and attainability can promote engagement.

    “Attainability encouraged them to set personal goals to improve or maintain their scores, indicating that striking a balance between difficulty and attainability can promote engagement [49].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Assessment using a small touch screen may not be feasible for patients with visual impairments or those requiring a larger typeface.

    “In addition, assessment using a small touch screen may not be feasible for patients with visual impairments or those requiring a larger typeface.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is unclear whether results would generalize to patients with different severity or to those who are less motivated.

    “As our study focused on patients with mild-to-moderate MDD who volunteered for participation, it is unclear whether results would generalize to patients with different severity or to those who are less motivated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The study supports the feasibility and validity of high-frequency assessment on wearable devices to assess cognitive function and mood in patients with MDD.

    “This study supports the feasibility and validity of high-frequency assessment on wearable devices to assess cognitive function and mood in patients with MDD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Wrist-worn heart rate monitors, including the Apple Watch, have variable accuracy compared with electrocardiogram measurement.

    “Variable accuracy for wrist-worn heart rate monitors, including the Apple Watch, compared with electrocardiogram measurement has also been noted previously in brief comparisons of bouts of exercise [56].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    n-back performance can be used as a sensitive but nonspecific marker of cognitive function.

    “Consistent with this suggestion, n-back mean and intercept correlated with full-length CANTAB cognitive tests of attention and working memory, supporting the use of n-back performance as a sensitive but nonspecific marker of cognitive function.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Discrepancies between objectively and subjectively assessed cognitive function have been reported, with subjective assessments affected by depressed mood.

    “Discrepancies between objectively and subjectively assessed cognitive function have been reported before, with the latter being affected by depressed mood [15,24,25].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [15] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    Caution is required when this equipment is used to examine heart rate in scientific research.

    “Although the wearable nature and ease of use of the technology allow for data to be collected over longer periods of time, our findings indicate that caution is required when this equipment is used to examine heart rate in scientific research.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Heart rate measurement issues may reflect that the equipment was not of medical grade, or occasions when the Apple Watch was not fitted sufficiently tightly for reliable measures to be obtained.

    “Measurement issues with heart rate data may reflect that the equipment was not of medical grade, or occasions when the Apple Watch was not fitted sufficiently tightly for reliable measures to be obtained.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
51 of 51
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A key obstacle is the lack of readily available tools for cognitive assessments outside the clinic.

    “A key obstacle is the lack of readily available tools for cognitive assessments outside the clinic.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 6-week period corresponds to the time when antidepressant pharmacotherapy shows efficacy in treating the mood symptoms of major depressive disorder.

    “Testing was completed in the subsequent 6 weeks (42 days), corresponding to the time when antidepressant pharmacotherapy shows efficacy in treating the mood symptoms of MDD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Digital tools providing real-time data assessing cognitive function could help support patient treatment and remediation of cognitive and mood symptoms.

    “Digital tools providing real-time data assessing cognitive function could help support patient treatment and remediation of cognitive and mood symptoms.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 6-week period corresponds to the time during which response to antidepressant pharmacotherapy efficacy would be expected to be demonstrated.

    “The study spanned 6 weeks, corresponding to the time during which response to antidepressant pharmacotherapy efficacy would expect to be demonstrated, indicating that high levels of adherence can be achieved and retained over this time frame.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Loneliness correlation lies outside its reported confidence interval

    Minor

    The reported correlation is positive, but both printed confidence-interval endpoints are negative. The interval is also printed in reverse order.

  • Overall watch-wearing adherence does not match weekly values

    Minor

    Each study week covers seven days, so the overall adherence percentage should equal the mean of the six weekly percentages. Those values average 91.58%, not the reported 90.08%.

    Reported 90.08 · recomputed 91.583333

  • Medication-duration SD is incompatible with the reported maximum

    Minor

    With 30 participants, a mean of 9.9 months and one value of 94.3 months, the smallest possible sample SD is about 15.9 months. The reported SD of 9.5 months is therefore impossible.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2013, DSM-5 Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cormack, F., McCue, M., Taptiklis, N., Skirrow, C., Glazer, E., Panagopoulos, E., van Schaik, T. A., Fehnert, B., King, J., & Barnett, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Cambridge Cognition (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Takeda (United States) (US)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Cormack, Francesca
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2019-11-18
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
e12814
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2965472879
Cited by
79
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9
FWCI
11.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, wearable devices, Apple Watch, mood assessment, n-back task, cognitive symptoms of depression, antidepressant response, medication adherence, validity and feasibility, mental health apps, mild to moderate depression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review