Wearable technology for high-frequency cognitive and mood assessment in major depressive disorder: longitudinal observational study
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Cognitive symptoms are common in major depressive disorder and may help to identify patients who need treatment or who are not experiencing adequate treatment response. Digital tools providing real-time data assessing cognitive function could help support patient treatment and remediation of cognitive and mood symptoms. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine feasibility and validity of a wearable high-frequency cognitive and mood assessment app over 6 weeks, corresponding to when antidepressant pharmacotherapy begins to show efficacy. Methods: A total of 30 patients (aged 19-63 years; 19 women) with mild-to-moderate depression participated in the study. The new Cognition Kit app was delivered via the Apple Watch, providing a high-resolution touch screen display for task presentation and logging responses. Cognition was assessed by the n-back task up to 3 times daily and depressed mood by 3 short questions once daily. Adherence was defined as participants completing at least 1 assessment daily. Selected tests sensitive to depression from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery and validated questionnaires of depression symptom severity were administered on 3 occasions (weeks 1, 3, and 6). Exploratory analyses examined the relationship between mood and cognitive measures acquired in low- and high-frequency assessment. Results: Adherence was excellent for mood and cognitive assessments (95% and 96%, respectively), did not deteriorate over time, and was not influenced by depression symptom severity or cognitive function at study onset. Analyses examining the relationship between high-frequency cognitive and mood assessment and validated measures showed good correspondence. Daily mood assessments correlated moderately with validated depression questionnaires (r=0.45-0.69 for total daily mood score), and daily cognitive assessments correlated moderately with validated cognitive tests sensitive to depression (r=0.37-0.50 for mean n-back). Conclusions: This study supports the feasibility and validity of high-frequency assessment of cognition and mood using wearable devices over an extended period in patients with major depressive disorder.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In 30 adults with mild-to-moderate major depressive disorder, a wearable Apple Watch app delivered high-frequency n-back cognitive and mood assessments over 6 weeks with high adherence and moderate correlations with validated measures. The authors conclude that wearable high-frequency assessment of cognition and mood is feasible and valid in this population.
Key findings
- Adherence was high: cognitive assessments were completed on 95.63% (SD 9.28) of days and mood assessments on 94.60% (SD 9.73) of days overall; 21/30 participants had full cognitive adherence and 15/30 had full mood adherence. Adherence did not deteriorate over time and was not predicted by baseline depression symptom severity or cognitive function.
- Daily mood assessments correlated moderately with validated questionnaires: total daily mood correlated with PHQ-9 at r=0.69, PDQ-D at r=0.65, and UCLA-LS at r=0.45; the abstract reports r=0.45-0.69 for total daily mood.
- Daily n-back performance correlated moderately with validated cognitive tests: mean dprime correlated with SWM between errors at r=−0.46, SWM strategy at r=−0.37, RVP A′ at r=0.50, and RVP median latency at r=−0.42; the abstract reports r=0.37-0.50 for mean n-back.
- N-back performance improved over time, best fit by a cubic model (BIC=1298.05; likelihood ratio=10.36; P=.001), while mood showed a modest linear improvement (fixed effect of study day=−0.0026, P=.01) with heterogeneous individual trajectories.
Methods
- Longitudinal observational feasibility and validity study of 30 patients aged 19-63 years (19 women) with mild-to-moderate MDD (PHQ-9 5-15) on antidepressant monotherapy; participants used an Apple Watch app for 6 weeks.
- Cognitive function was assessed with an n-back task up to 3 times daily, and mood with 3 short questions once daily; full-length CANTAB cognitive tests and validated questionnaires (PHQ-9, PDQ-D, UCLA-LS) were administered at weeks 1, 3, and 6.
- Analyses included adherence summaries, logistic mixed models for adherence over time, longitudinal mixed-effects models for daily cognition and mood, multilevel reliability for mood items, and correlations between daily and full-length measures.
Limitations
- Stated: the study included volunteers with mild-to-moderate MDD, so generalizability to other severity levels or less motivated patients is unclear; small touch-screen assessment may not suit visual impairments or those needing larger typeface; step counts from Apple Watch and iPhone were discrepant, undermining activity-data reliability; heart rate measurement issues were noted, including a biologically implausible minimum of 22 bpm, and caution is required for scientific heart-rate research.
- Evident: the sample was small (n=30) and there was no control or comparison group; exploratory analyses did not correct for multiple comparisons; adherence may have been supported by study-center contact and reminders, and the 6-week duration does not establish longer-term feasibility.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 55 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Adherence was not influenced by cognitive function at study onset.
“Adherence was excellent for mood and cognitive assessments (95% and 96%, respectively), did not deteriorate over time, and was not influenced by depression symptom severity or cognitive function at study onset.”
- Also stated in: § Adherence · plain
“Adherence was not significantly correlated with any CANTAB measures at week 1 (maximum rho=0.15; P=.44).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Adherence · plain
- Findingown data
Adherence was not influenced by depression symptom severity at study onset.
“Adherence was excellent for mood and cognitive assessments (95% and 96%, respectively), did not deteriorate over time, and was not influenced by depression symptom severity or cognitive function at study onset.”
- Also stated in: § Adherence · boosted
“Logistic regression confirmed that self-reported depressive symptoms, assessed by the PHQ-9, PDQ-D, and UCLA-LS, were not associated with level of adherence in mood or cognitive assessments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Adherence · boosted
- Findingown data
Adherence did not deteriorate over time.
“Adherence was excellent for mood and cognitive assessments (95% and 96%, respectively), did not deteriorate over time, and was not influenced by depression symptom severity or cognitive function at study onset.”
- Also stated in: § Adherence · plain
“However, logistic mixed modeling showed no deterioration in adherence (ie, responding at least once daily) over time for assessments of mood, cognition, or activity.”
- Also stated in: § Adherence · plain
“Adherence, defined as engaging with cognitive and mood assessments at least once daily, was very high (95%-96%), did not deteriorate over time, and was not predicted by depressive symptoms or cognitive function at study onset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Adherence · plain
- Findingown data
Adherence to mood and cognitive assessments was excellent (95% and 96%, respectively).
“Adherence was excellent for mood and cognitive assessments (95% and 96%, respectively), did not deteriorate over time, and was not influenced by depression symptom severity or cognitive function at study onset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Daily mood assessments correlated moderately with validated depression questionnaires (r=0.45-0.69 for total daily mood score).
“Daily mood assessments correlated moderately with validated depression questionnaires (r=0.45-0.69 for total daily mood score), and daily cognitive assessments correlated moderately with validated cognitive tests sensitive to depression (r=0.37-0.50 for mean n-back).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Daily cognitive assessments correlated moderately with validated cognitive tests sensitive to depression (r=0.37-0.50 for mean n-back).
“Daily mood assessments correlated moderately with validated depression questionnaires (r=0.45-0.69 for total daily mood score), and daily cognitive assessments correlated moderately with validated cognitive tests sensitive to depression (r=0.37-0.50 for mean n-back).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Daily mood assessments showed moderate to strong correlations with validated self-report questionnaires of depression, cognitive problems, and loneliness.
“Daily mood assessments showed moderate to strong correlations with validated self-report questionnaires of depression, cognitive problems, and loneliness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Logistic regression confirmed modest reductions in individual assessments (morning, afternoon, and evening) over the study duration.
“Furthermore, although adherence (responding at least daily) remained high throughout the duration of the study, logistic regression confirmed modest reductions in individual assessments (morning, afternoon, and evening) over the study duration (morning: fixed-effects estimate=−0.03, P=.02; afternoon: fixed-effects estimate=−0.02, P<.001; evening: fixed-effects estimate=−0.08, P<.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PHQ-9 and PDQ-D correlated more highly with daily mood assessments than UCLA-LS loneliness.
“Self-reported depression (PHQ-9) and cognitive symptoms (PDQ-D) correlated more highly with daily mood assessments than self-reported loneliness as measured by the UCLA-LS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Individual learning rates (n-back slope) did not correlate significantly with either CANTAB cognitive test measures or self-reported mood.
“Individual learning rates for each participant were reflected in their n-back slope, which did not correlate significantly with either CANTAB cognitive test measures or self-reported mood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a great deal of heterogeneity in mood trajectories over the study duration.
“However, there was a great deal of heterogeneity on mood trajectories over the study duration, as shown in model fits for each study participant in Figure 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A multilevel analysis of total mood by study day found the best fit was a linear model (BIC=73.38; likelihood ratio=6.14; P=.01).
“Multilevel analysis of total mood by study day confirmed the best fit for a linear model (Bayesian information criterion=73.38; likelihood ratio=6.14; P=.01).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Participants' n-back performance improved over time.
“Participants’ performance on the n-back improved over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Full adherence (100%, 42/42 days) was seen in 15 of 30 participants for mood testing.
“Full adherence (100%, 42/42 days) was seen in 21 of 30 participants for cognitive assessment, 15 of 30 participants for mood testing, and 13 of 30 participants for activity assessment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Full adherence (100%, 42/42 days) was seen in 13 of 30 participants for activity assessment.
“Full adherence (100%, 42/42 days) was seen in 21 of 30 participants for cognitive assessment, 15 of 30 participants for mood testing, and 13 of 30 participants for activity assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Daily n-back performance correlated moderately with performance on standardized tests of working memory and sustained attention.
“Daily n-back performance correlated moderately with performance on standardized tests of working memory and sustained attention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Total mood showed a modest overall linear improvement over the study (fixed effect of study day = −0.0026, P=.01).
“This model showed a modest overall linear improvement in mood over the course of the study (estimate of fixed effect of study day on mood=−0.0026, P=.01).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants completed a mean of 86.8% of all possible n-back assessments (range 50%-99%, 63-125 of 126 assessments).
“Participants completed a mean of 86.8% of all possible n-back assessments (range 50%-99%, 63-125 of 126 assessments).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Depressive symptoms assessed with the PHQ-9 correlated with mean dprime.
“Depressive symptoms assessed with the PHQ-9 correlated with mean dprime, and correlations with dprime intercept approached but did not reach statistical significance (P=.06).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Adherence was not predicted by depressive symptoms or cognitive function at study onset.
“Adherence, defined as engaging with cognitive and mood assessments at least once daily, was very high (95%-96%), did not deteriorate over time, and was not predicted by depressive symptoms or cognitive function at study onset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Correlations between depressive symptoms assessed with the PHQ-9 and dprime intercept approached but did not reach statistical significance (P=.06).
“Depressive symptoms assessed with the PHQ-9 correlated with mean dprime, and correlations with dprime intercept approached but did not reach statistical significance (P=.06).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Overall, the Apple Watch provided a higher step count estimate than the iPhone.
“Overall, the Apple Watch provided a higher step count estimate than the iPhone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Very few participants reached and maintained ceiling levels of performance on the n-back.
“Importantly, very few participants reached and maintained ceiling levels of performance on the n-back.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Almost all participants felt that the task was challenging yet achievable.
“Almost all participants felt that the task was challenging yet achievable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Participants reported continued improvement in task performance as a motivator for engagement.
“Participants reported continued improvement in task performance as a motivator for engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Full adherence (100%, 42/42 days) was seen in 21 of 30 participants for cognitive assessment.
“Full adherence (100%, 42/42 days) was seen in 21 of 30 participants for cognitive assessment, 15 of 30 participants for mood testing, and 13 of 30 participants for activity assessment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mean overall scores from daily mood assessments correlated moderately with full-length self-report questionnaires.
“Mean overall scores from daily mood assessments were correlated with full-length self-report questionnaires, showing moderate correlations (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adherence (engaging with cognitive and mood assessments at least once daily) was very high (95%-96%).
“Adherence, defined as engaging with cognitive and mood assessments at least once daily, was very high (95%-96%), did not deteriorate over time, and was not predicted by depressive symptoms or cognitive function at study onset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dprime slope showed no significant relationship with the number of n-back assessments completed.
“Dprime slope showed no significant relationship with the number of n-back assessments completed (rho=−0.02, 95% CIs −0.37 to 0.34; P=.91).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Rate of responding in the morning (84%) was lower than the afternoon (87%) and evening (89%).
“Rate of responding in the morning (84%) was lower than the afternoon (87%) and evening (89%; χ22=12.9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
dprime mean and intercept had significant correlations with total mood scores, lack of interest, and low mood.
“Significant correlations between dprime mean and intercept were seen for total mood scores, for question items assessing lack of interest, and for low mood (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
n-back mean and intercept correlated with full-length CANTAB cognitive tests of attention and working memory.
“Consistent with this suggestion, n-back mean and intercept correlated with full-length CANTAB cognitive tests of attention and working memory, supporting the use of n-back performance as a sensitive but nonspecific marker of cognitive function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Correlations between daily measures and validated self-report questionnaires were moderate to high.
“In this study, correlations between daily measures and validated self-report questionnaires were moderate to high.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Step counts collected via the Apple Watch and the iPhone were discrepant.
“Step counts collected via the Apple Watch and the iPhone were discrepant, which could be accounted for by differences in wearing patterns but undermines the reliability of activity data from either device.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Aggregate daily mood measures had a significant association with CANTAB cognitive measures and n-back task performance (mean and intercept).
“However, we observed a significant association between aggregate daily mood measures with cognitive measures from CANTAB and n-back task performance (mean and intercept).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
This study supports the feasibility and validity of high-frequency assessment of cognition and mood using wearable devices over an extended period in patients with major depressive disorder.
“This study supports the feasibility and validity of high-frequency assessment of cognition and mood using wearable devices over an extended period in patients with major depressive disorder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A key obstacle is the lack of readily available tools for cognitive assessments outside the clinic.
- Rests on an assumption: The 6-week period corresponds to the time when antidepressant pharmacotherapy shows efficacy in treating the mood symptoms of major depressive disorder.
- Rests on an assumption: Digital tools providing real-time data assessing cognitive function could help support patient treatment and remediation of cognitive and mood symptoms.
- Premisecitation
Poorer memory, attention, and executive function have been associated with impairment in activities of daily living.
“Poorer memory [15,16], attention, and executive function [17] have been associated with impairment in activities of daily living.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Cognitive symptoms contribute to the risk of relapse.
“Cognitive symptoms are seen in first-episode depression [6,8], persist beyond the symptoms of low mood [9-11], contribute to the risk of relapse [12], and worsen with repeated depressive episodes [13,14].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Improved cognitive function has been associated with higher rates of employment at follow-up in a variety of psychiatric illnesses, including major depressive disorder.
“Longitudinally, improved cognitive function has been associated with higher rates of employment at follow-up in a variety of psychiatric illnesses, including MDD [23].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cognitive symptoms are seen in first-episode depression.
“Cognitive symptoms are seen in first-episode depression [6,8], persist beyond the symptoms of low mood [9-11], contribute to the risk of relapse [12], and worsen with repeated depressive episodes [13,14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Cognitive symptoms persist beyond the symptoms of low mood.
“Cognitive symptoms are seen in first-episode depression [6,8], persist beyond the symptoms of low mood [9-11], contribute to the risk of relapse [12], and worsen with repeated depressive episodes [13,14].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Cognitive symptoms worsen with repeated depressive episodes.
“Cognitive symptoms are seen in first-episode depression [6,8], persist beyond the symptoms of low mood [9-11], contribute to the risk of relapse [12], and worsen with repeated depressive episodes [13,14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Treating cognitive symptoms has the potential to improve functional outcomes and quality of life.
“Treating these symptoms has the potential to improve functional outcomes and quality of life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Cognitive symptoms of major depressive disorder contribute to disability burden.
“Cognitive MDD symptoms contribute to disability burden [15].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The n-back task has shown sensitivity to impairments in major depressive disorder.
“Cognitive assessment was completed using a variant of the n-back task, a task which has shown sensitivity to impairments in MDD [35].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The study demonstrated the feasibility of daily assessments of cognition and mood in mild-to-moderate MDD.
“This study demonstrated the feasibility of daily assessments of cognition and mood in mild-to-moderate MDD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 6-week period corresponds to the time during which response to antidepressant pharmacotherapy efficacy would be expected to be demonstrated.
- Interpretationreasoning
Improvements on the n-back likely reflect the influence of practice effects and task specialization.
“Improvements on the n-back, therefore, likely reflect the influence of practice effects and task specialization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
n-back depends on functions such as updating, inhibition, and attention, not simply working memory capacity.
“Research suggests that n-back is not simply a measure of working memory capacity but depends on functions such as updating, inhibition, and attention [52].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The findings support the concurrent validity of the measures examined during daily assessments.
“Findings support the concurrent validity of the measures examined during daily assessments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Within-person generalizability was moderate to high (R=0.75 for within-person variation with time nested within individuals).
“within-person generalizability was moderate to high (R=0.75 for within-person variation with time nested within individuals)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
A sample size of 30 allows estimation of a compliance rate of 80%, with 95% CIs of ±12.8%.
“A sample size of 30 allows estimation of a compliance rate of 80%, with 95% CIs of ±12.8%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Study center support and reminders during nonadherent periods provided a framework to enable participants to maintain a high level of engagement with the study.
“Study center support and reminders during nonadherent periods provided a framework to enable participants to maintain a high level of engagement with the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The adherence rates and overall response rate (≈87% for all possible cognitive assessments) are in keeping with previous compliance rates (50%-90%) reported in high-frequency assessments in psychopharmacology.
“These adherence rates, as well as the overall rate of responding to high-frequency assessments in the current study (≈87% for all possible cognitive assessments), are in keeping with previous compliance rates reported in high-frequency assessments in psychopharmacology, around 50% to 90% [45].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CANTAB cognitive assessments have shown sensitivity to a range of cognitive deficits in depression.
“CANTAB cognitive assessments have shown sensitivity to a range of cognitive deficits in depression [10].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Between-person reliabilities were high (R=0.97 averaged over time and with time nested within individuals).
“Between-person reliabilities were high (R=0.97 averaged over time and with time nested within individuals)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
High levels of adherence can be achieved and retained over a 6-week time frame.
“indicating that high levels of adherence can be achieved and retained over this time frame.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
These studies have relied on quantitative self-report or simple sensing and monitoring technologies.
“However, these studies have relied on quantitative self-report or simple sensing and monitoring technologies [26].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The discrepancy in step counts undermines the reliability of activity data from either device.
“Step counts collected via the Apple Watch and the iPhone were discrepant, which could be accounted for by differences in wearing patterns but undermines the reliability of activity data from either device.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Self-reported cognitive function cannot substitute for objective assessments.
“PDQ-D scores were correlated with daily mood assessments but not with cognitive performance, indicating that self-reported cognitive function cannot substitute for objective assessments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These methods can be used to monitor cognitive function and mood symptoms after the initiation of treatment for depression.
“Our study suggests that these methods can be used to monitor cognitive function and mood symptoms after the initiation of treatment for depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Retrospective recall shows distortion in favor of more salient or unique events at the expense of the more mundane.
“Retrospective recall shows distortion in favor of more salient or unique events at the expense of the more mundane [54]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
High-frequency assessment may be particularly useful in patients with MDD for ensuring accurate recording of the course of their illness and treatment response.
“High-frequency assessment may be particularly useful in patients with MDD for ensuring accurate recording of the course of their illness and treatment response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Depression is associated with negative biases in recollection during periods of low mood.
“and depression is associated with negative biases in recollection during periods of low mood [55].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Questionnaires relying on retrospective recall tend to overstate the severity and frequency of symptoms.
“Although in some cases the correlations are good [53], there can be a mismatch, with questionnaires relying on retrospective recall tending to overstate the severity and frequency of symptoms [54].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The results confirm the association between subjective cognitive function and depressed mood.
“Our results confirm this association.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 29
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants reported that completing assessments was easier when study sessions fit into their daily routines, and that periods of high and low mood affected their motivation to complete assessments.
“Participants reported that completing assessments was easier when study sessions fit into their daily routines, and that periods of high and low mood affected their motivation to complete assessments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdherence was affected by technical problems for some participants and by forgetting to wear the Apple Watch due to low mood or bereavement.
“Adherence was also affected by technical problems for some participants, and by forgetting to wear the Apple Watch because of low mood or bereavement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBecause of a technical issue on the final study day, the evening session was not administered, resulting in lower adherence on day 42.
“Because of a technical issue on the final study day, the evening session was not administered, resulting in lower adherence on day 42.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationCorrelations were highest for the PHQ-9, which also showed the highest item overlap with high-frequency assessments.
“Correlations were highest for the PHQ-9, a scale designed as both a diagnostic instrument and a severity measure [34], which also showed the highest item overlap with high-frequency assessments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCorrelations between n-back performance and daily reported cognitive symptoms, and all correlations with dprime slope, were nonsignificant (P=.12-.79).
“Correlations between n-back performance and daily reported cognitive symptoms and all correlations with dprime slope were nonsignificant (P=.12-.79).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHeart rate measurement using the Apple Watch had measurement issues, including a minimum registered heart rate of 22 bpm, which was not biologically plausible.
“Measurement issues were noted for heart rate using the Apple Watch, with individual heart rates registered including a minimum of 22 beats per minute, which was not biologically plausible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants with better performance on CANTAB showed higher intercept and better mean performance on the n-back.
“Participants with better performance on CANTAB showed higher intercept and better mean performance on the n-back.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMultilevel analysis of dprime score by study day confirmed a better fit for a cubic term rather than quadratic or linear models, indicating an initial rapid improvement in performance followed by a plateau.
“Multilevel analysis of dprime score by study day confirmed a better fit for a cubic term rather than quadratic or linear models (Bayesian information criterion=1298.05; likelihood ratio=10.36; P=.001), indicating an initial rapid improvement in performance followed by a plateau.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPeriods of low adherence tended to cluster temporally.
“Periods of low adherence tended to cluster temporally (Multimedia Appendix 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOverall, mood symptoms showed a modest concurrent improvement, with great heterogeneity in the trajectories observed over the assessment period.
“Overall, mood symptoms showed a modest concurrent improvement, albeit with great heterogeneity in the trajectories observed over the assessment period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo significant correlations were seen with PDQ-D or UCLA-LS, or dprime slope.
“No significant correlations were seen with PDQ-D or UCLA-LS, or dprime slope.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSWM between errors and strategy showed moderate correlations with daily reported mood, whereas RVP outcome measures were nonsignificant.
“Examining the relationship between daily mood assessment and CANTAB measures, SWM between errors and strategy showed moderate correlations with daily reported mood, whereas correlations with RVP outcome measures were nonsignificant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenParticipants were stabilized on monotherapy at the time of assessment, and many had started their current treatment many months before study participation (9.9 months on average).
“Participants were stabilized on monotherapy at the time of assessment, and many had started their current treatment many months before study participation (9.9 months on average).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStep counts registered on the two devices had a moderate correlation (rho=0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.65; P<.001), with instances of marked discrepancy.
“A moderate correlation was seen between step counts registered on the 2 devices (rho=0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.65; P<.001), but there were also instances of marked discrepancy (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPDQ-D scores correlated with daily mood assessments but not with cognitive performance.
“PDQ-D scores were correlated with daily mood assessments but not with cognitive performance, indicating that self-reported cognitive function cannot substitute for objective assessments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMood trajectories were highly heterogeneous and showed no clear relationship with change in cognitive performance.
“The trajectory of moods reported by patients during the course of the study was highly heterogeneous, showing no clear relationship with change in cognitive performance (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearch has highlighted discrepancies between objectively measured cognitive function and patients' self-report from questionnaires, with the latter being affected by depressed mood.
“Research has highlighted discrepancies between objectively measured cognitive function and patients’ self-report from questionnaires, with the latter being affected by depressed mood [15,24,25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCognitive symptoms, including difficulty concentrating or making decisions, are features of major depressive disorder.
“Cognitive symptoms, including difficulty concentrating or making decisions, are features of MDD [3] that may offer a target for intervention [4].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] 2013, DSM-5 Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCognitive symptoms have been associated with poor occupational functioning and unemployment, work-related disability, and adverse psychosocial outcomes.
“Cognitive symptoms have also been associated with poor occupational functioning [18] and unemployment [19], work-related disability, and adverse psychosocial outcomes [20-22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCognitive symptoms of major depressive disorder include deficits in several domains, including processing speed, attention, executive function, learning, and memory.
“Cognitive symptoms of MDD include deficits in several domains, including processing speed, attention, executive function, learning, and memory [5-7].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMobile digital technologies allow for sampling outside of the clinic and in the patient's home or work environment, providing a shared platform for clinicians and patients to monitor symptoms.
“Mobile digital technologies allow for sampling outside of the clinic and in the patient’s home or work environment, providing a shared platform for clinicians and patients to monitor symptoms [26].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe PHQ-2 is a validated brief form of the PHQ-9.
“Mood was assessed with 2 questions adapted from the PHQ-2, a validated brief form of the PHQ-9, which assesses only low mood and loss of interest or pleasure and is sensitive to depression and suitable for brief assessments [36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe brevity of the current protocol in conjunction with the proximity to wearable assessments may have helped to support the high levels of compliance seen here.
“The brevity of the current protocol in conjunction with the proximity to wearable assessments may have helped to support the high levels of compliance seen here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious studies in patients with mood disorders have shown good overall feasibility and acceptability of high-frequency assessments, although there is likely to be an interaction between protocol burden and burden of illness.
“Previous studies in patients with mood disorders have shown good overall feasibility and acceptability of high-frequency assessments, although there is likely to be an interaction between protocol burden and burden of illness [46].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe three daily mood items showed overall good reliability indices, supporting their combined use.
“The 3 mood items showed overall good reliability indices, supporting the combined use of the 3 question items.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo reduce multiple comparisons, overall scores from self-report questionnaires and CANTAB cognitive testing were calculated by taking the mean of outcome measures obtained at weeks 1, 3, and 6.
“To reduce multiple comparisons, overall scores from self-report questionnaires and CANTAB cognitive testing were calculated by taking the mean of outcome measures obtained at weeks 1, 3, and 6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression (PDQ-D) is a measure that assesses subjective cognitive dysfunction in depression.
“One additional item assessing self-perceived concentration was taken from the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire—Depression (PDQ-D) [37,38], a measure that assesses subjective cognitive dysfunction in depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was reviewed and approved by the Proportionate Review Sub-Committee of the Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 at Swansea University (REC reference: 17/WA/0042) and performed in accordance with the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki.
“The study was reviewed and approved by the Proportionate Review Sub-Committee of the Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 at Swansea University (REC reference: 17/WA/0042) and performed in accordance with the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenNormality of summary measures and data was assessed with visual examination and the Shapiro-Wilk test before further analysis.
“Normality of all summary measures was assessed with visual examination of the data and with the Shapiro-Wilk test before further analysis.”
- Also stated in: § Statistical Analysis · plain
“Normality of data was assessed with visual examination of the data and with the Shapiro-Wilk test before further analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Statistical Analysis · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAs this was an exploratory study, no corrections for multiple comparisons were made.
“As this was an exploratory study, no corrections for multiple comparisons were made.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAssumptions of logistic regression models were investigated by examining the distribution and patterns of residuals versus fitted values.
“Assumptions of logistic regression models were investigated by examining the distribution and patterns of residuals versus fitted values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe capacity to improve performance is not directly affected by either depressive symptoms or cognitive impairment.
“This suggests that the capacity to improve performance is not directly affected by either depressive symptoms or cognitive impairment, consistent with research in a previous study showing that practice effects in cognitive tasks were not moderated by depressive symptomatology [50].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStudies exploring gamification show that the use of game design elements (eg, points and scoreboards) can improve motivation.
“This finding is supported by studies exploring gamification of tasks, where the use of game design elements (eg, points and scoreboards) can improve motivation [47,48].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe n-back paradigm activates a network of frontoparietal areas.
“The n-back paradigm is commonly used alongside functional neuroimaging, where it activates a network of frontoparietal areas [51].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis study was significantly longer in duration than most previous high-frequency assessment studies, spanning 6 weeks rather than the typical 1- to 2-week duration, and the daily frequency of assessment was lower, with most other studies typically sampling 5 to 10 times per day.
“However, it is notable that although this study was significantly longer in duration than most previous high-frequency assessment studies, spanning 6 weeks rather than the typical 1- to 2-week duration, the daily frequency of assessment was lower, with most other studies typically sampling 5 to 10 times per day [45].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenNo corrections for missing data and no other adjustments to raw data were made.
“No corrections for missing data and no other adjustments to raw data were made.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMobile apps have been used as part of randomized controlled trials to evaluate treatment efficacy.
“In depression, mobile apps have tracked changes in patient-reported mood [27-29] and have been used as part of randomized controlled trials to evaluate treatment efficacy [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn depression, mobile apps have tracked changes in patient-reported mood.
“In depression, mobile apps have tracked changes in patient-reported mood [27-29] and have been used as part of randomized controlled trials to evaluate treatment efficacy [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe PHQ-2 is sensitive to depression and suitable for brief assessments.
“Mood was assessed with 2 questions adapted from the PHQ-2, a validated brief form of the PHQ-9, which assesses only low mood and loss of interest or pleasure and is sensitive to depression and suitable for brief assessments [36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenA sample size of 30 provides 80% power to detect correlations of r=0.5.
“This sample size also provides 80% power to detect correlations of r=0.5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll participants provided written informed consent before enrollment.
“All participants provided written informed consent before enrollment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe PHQ-2 assesses only low mood and loss of interest or pleasure.
“Mood was assessed with 2 questions adapted from the PHQ-2, a validated brief form of the PHQ-9, which assesses only low mood and loss of interest or pleasure and is sensitive to depression and suitable for brief assessments [36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationStriking a balance between difficulty and attainability can promote engagement.
“Attainability encouraged them to set personal goals to improve or maintain their scores, indicating that striking a balance between difficulty and attainability can promote engagement [49].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAssessment using a small touch screen may not be feasible for patients with visual impairments or those requiring a larger typeface.
“In addition, assessment using a small touch screen may not be feasible for patients with visual impairments or those requiring a larger typeface.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt is unclear whether results would generalize to patients with different severity or to those who are less motivated.
“As our study focused on patients with mild-to-moderate MDD who volunteered for participation, it is unclear whether results would generalize to patients with different severity or to those who are less motivated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe study supports the feasibility and validity of high-frequency assessment on wearable devices to assess cognitive function and mood in patients with MDD.
“This study supports the feasibility and validity of high-frequency assessment on wearable devices to assess cognitive function and mood in patients with MDD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWrist-worn heart rate monitors, including the Apple Watch, have variable accuracy compared with electrocardiogram measurement.
“Variable accuracy for wrist-worn heart rate monitors, including the Apple Watch, compared with electrocardiogram measurement has also been noted previously in brief comparisons of bouts of exercise [56].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown datan-back performance can be used as a sensitive but nonspecific marker of cognitive function.
“Consistent with this suggestion, n-back mean and intercept correlated with full-length CANTAB cognitive tests of attention and working memory, supporting the use of n-back performance as a sensitive but nonspecific marker of cognitive function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDiscrepancies between objectively and subjectively assessed cognitive function have been reported, with subjective assessments affected by depressed mood.
“Discrepancies between objectively and subjectively assessed cognitive function have been reported before, with the latter being affected by depressed mood [15,24,25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataCaution is required when this equipment is used to examine heart rate in scientific research.
“Although the wearable nature and ease of use of the technology allow for data to be collected over longer periods of time, our findings indicate that caution is required when this equipment is used to examine heart rate in scientific research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataHeart rate measurement issues may reflect that the equipment was not of medical grade, or occasions when the Apple Watch was not fitted sufficiently tightly for reliable measures to be obtained.
“Measurement issues with heart rate data may reflect that the equipment was not of medical grade, or occasions when the Apple Watch was not fitted sufficiently tightly for reliable measures to be obtained.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
A key obstacle is the lack of readily available tools for cognitive assessments outside the clinic.
“A key obstacle is the lack of readily available tools for cognitive assessments outside the clinic.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 6-week period corresponds to the time when antidepressant pharmacotherapy shows efficacy in treating the mood symptoms of major depressive disorder.
“Testing was completed in the subsequent 6 weeks (42 days), corresponding to the time when antidepressant pharmacotherapy shows efficacy in treating the mood symptoms of MDD.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Digital tools providing real-time data assessing cognitive function could help support patient treatment and remediation of cognitive and mood symptoms.
“Digital tools providing real-time data assessing cognitive function could help support patient treatment and remediation of cognitive and mood symptoms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 6-week period corresponds to the time during which response to antidepressant pharmacotherapy efficacy would be expected to be demonstrated.
“The study spanned 6 weeks, corresponding to the time during which response to antidepressant pharmacotherapy efficacy would expect to be demonstrated, indicating that high levels of adherence can be achieved and retained over this time frame.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cormack et al. observed high correspondence between frequent assessments and established measures, showing moderate alignment between daily mood evaluations and validated depression questionnaires, and similar correlation for cognitive assessments with depression-sensitive tests.
“High correspondence was observed between frequent assessments and established measures, showing moderate alignment between daily mood evaluations and validated depression questionnaires, and similar correlation for cognitive assessments with depression-sensitive tests”
From A narrative review of digital biomarkers in the management of major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant forms (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
In that wearable-technology study, mood improved somewhat but varied among participants.
“While there was some improvement in mood, it varied among participants, highlighting the complexity of depression.”
From A narrative review of digital biomarkers in the management of major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant forms (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Daily assessments using wearable technology over 6 weeks in individuals with MDD were practical and showed meaningful correlations with established measures of mood and cognition.
“The study found that daily assessments were practical and showed meaningful correlations with established measures of mood and cognition.”
From A narrative review of digital biomarkers in the management of major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant forms (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Loneliness correlation lies outside its reported confidence interval
MinorThe reported correlation is positive, but both printed confidence-interval endpoints are negative. The interval is also printed in reverse order.
“0.35”
“(−0.02 to −0.63)”
Overall watch-wearing adherence does not match weekly values
MinorEach study week covers seven days, so the overall adherence percentage should equal the mean of the six weekly percentages. Those values average 91.58%, not the reported 90.08%.
Reported 90.08 · recomputed 91.583333
“| | Mean (SD) | 90.08 (17.4) | 94.54 (14.99) | 92.12 (18.15) | 92.38 (20.11) | 92.38 (19.03) | 92.86 (17.09) | 85.22 (24.29) |”
Medication-duration SD is incompatible with the reported maximum
MinorWith 30 participants, a mean of 9.9 months and one value of 94.3 months, the smallest possible sample SD is about 15.9 months. The reported SD of 9.5 months is therefore impossible.
“average of 9.9 months (range 0.4−94.3 months; SD 9.5)”
“Of the 37 eligible participants, 30 were enrolled”
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454 · see citing works
Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014) · 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.377 · Cited by 5,201 · see citing works
The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472 · Cited by 5,173 · see citing works
Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys
Moussavi, S., Chatterji, S., Verdes, E., Tandon, A., Patel, V., & Ustun, B. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61415-9 · Cited by 4,070 · see citing works
N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies.
Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20131 · Cited by 3,560 · see citing works
Ferrari, A. J., Charlson, F. J., Norman, R. E., Patten, S. B., Freedman, G., Murray, C. J. L., Vos, T., & Whiteford, H. A. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001547 · Cited by 3,115 · see citing works
Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rock, P. L., Roiser, J. P., Riedel, W. J., & Blackwell, A. D. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291713002535 · Cited by 2,161 · see citing works
Snyder, H. R. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028727 · Cited by 1,667 · see citing works
Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2)
Löwe, B., Kroenke, K., & Gräfe, K. (2005) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.09.006 · Cited by 1,473 · see citing works
Planning and spatial working memory following frontal lobe lesions in man
Owen, A. M., Downes, J. J., Sahakian, B. J., Polkey, C. E., & Robbins, T. W. (1990) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(90)90137-d · Cited by 1,241 · see citing works
Billingham, S. A., Whitehead, A. L., & Julious, S. A. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-104 · Cited by 962 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A recruitment target of 30 was set for this study, commensurate with usual practice for feasibility studies [33].”
A meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in first-episode Major Depressive Disorder
Lee, R. S. C., Hermens, D. F., Porter, M. A., & Redoblado-Hodge, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.023 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Cognitive impairment in euthymic major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis
Bora, E., Harrison, B. J., Yücel, M., & Pantelis, C. (2013) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291712002085 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Conradi, H. J., Ormel, J., & de Jonge, P. (2011) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291710001911 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Sahakian, B. J., Jones, G., Levy, R., Gray, J. A., & Warburton, D. M. (1989) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.154.6.797 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Cognitive functioning in major depression – a summary
Hammar, Å. (2009) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.026.2009 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment
Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., & Callan, R. C. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.008 · Cited by 474 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This finding is supported by studies exploring gamification of tasks, where the use of game design elements (eg, points and scoreboards) can improve motivation [47,48].”
Clark, D. M., & Teasdale, J. D. (1982) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.91.2.87 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Cognitive impairment in the remitted state of unipolar depressive disorder: A systematic review
Hasselbalch, B. J., Knorr, U., & Kessing, L. V. (2011) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.11.011 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Accuracy of wrist-worn heart rate monitors
Wang, R., Blackburn, G., Desai, M., Phelan, D., Gillinov, L., Houghtaling, P., & Gillinov, M. (2017) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.3340 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
The role of cognitive impairment in general functioning in major depression
Baune, B. T., Miller, R., McAfoose, J., Johnson, M., Quirk, F., & Mitchell, D. (2010) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.12.001 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
McClintock, S. M., Husain, M. M., Greer, T. L., & Cullum, C. M. (2010) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0017336 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Ahern, E., & Semkovska, M. (2017) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000319 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Torous, J., Staples, P., Shanahan, M., Lin, C., Peck, P., Keshavan, M., & Onnela, J.-P. (2015) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.3889 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Richardson, C. R., Buis, L. R., Janney, A. W., Goodrich, D. E., Sen, A., Hess, M. L., Mehari, K. S., Fortlage, L. A., Resnick, P. J., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1338 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Use of ecological momentary assessment in mood disorders research
Wenze, S. J., & Miller, I. W. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.007 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
The application of mHealth to mental health: opportunities and challenges
Marzano, L., Bardill, A., Fields, B., Herd, K., Veale, D., Grey, N., & Moran, P. (2015) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00268-0 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Evans, V. C., Iverson, G. L., Yatham, L. N., & Lam, R. W. (2014) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.13r08939 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Woo, Y. S., Rosenblat, J. D., Kakar, R., Bahk, W.-M., & McIntyre, R. S. (2016) · Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience · doi:10.9758/cpn.2016.14.1.1 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Anguera, J. A., Jordan, J. T., Castaneda, D., Gazzaley, A., & Areán, P. A. (2016) · BMJ Innovations · doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000098 · Cited by 172 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In depression, mobile apps have tracked changes in patient-reported mood [27-29] and have been used as part of randomized controlled trials to evaluate treatment efficacy [30].”
Tsanas, A., Saunders, K. E. A., Bilderbeck, A. C., Palmius, N., Osipov, M., Clifford, G. D., Goodwin, G. Μ., & De Vos, M. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.065 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Naismith, S. L., Longley, W. A., Scott, E. M., & Hickie, I. B. (2007) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-7-32 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Basso, M. R., & Bornstein, R. A. (1999) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.13.4.557 · Cited by 141 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Cognitive symptoms are seen in first-episode depression [6,8], persist beyond the symptoms of low mood [9-11], contribute to the risk of relapse [12], and worsen with repeated depressive episodes [13,14].”
Lee, R. S. C., Hermens, D. F., Naismith, S. L., Lagopoulos, J., Jones, A., Scott, J., Chitty, K. M., White, D., Robillard, R., Scott, E. M., et al. (2015) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2015.50 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Basso, M. R., & Bornstein, R. A. (1999) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037//0894-4105.13.4.557 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Mediators of the association between depression and role functioning
Buist‐Bouwman, M. A., Ormel, J., De Graaf, R., De Jonge, P., Van Sonderen, E., Alonso, J., Bruffaerts, R., Vollebergh, W. A. M., & the ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 investigators (2008) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01285.x · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Hollon, S. D., Shelton, R. C., Wisniewski, S., Warden, D., Biggs, M. M., Friedman, E. S., Husain, M., Kupfer, D. J., Nierenberg, A. A., Petersen, T. J., et al. (2006) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.07.008 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
A pilot study of an Internet walking program and pedometer in COPD
Moy, M. L., Weston, N. A., Wilson, E. J., Hess, M. L., & Richardson, C. R. (2012) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2012.06.013 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Lam, R., Lamy, F.-X., Danchenko, N., Yarlas, A., White, M. K., Rive, B., & Saragoussi, D. (2018) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s175188 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Cognition as a treatment target in depression
Kaser, M., Zaman, R., & Sahakian, B. J. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291716003123 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Practice Effects: A Unique Cognitive Variable
Duff, K., Callister, C., Dennett, K., & Tometich, D. (2012) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2012.722685 · Cited by 94 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This suggests that the capacity to improve performance is not directly affected by either depressive symptoms or cognitive impairment, consistent with research in a previous study showing that practice effects in cognitive tasks were not moderated by depressive symptomatology [50].”
Patient-centered assessment of cognitive symptoms of depression
Fehnel, S. E., Forsyth, B. H., DiBenedetti, D. B., Danchenko, N., François, C., & Brevig, T. (2016) · CNS Spectrums · doi:10.1017/s1092852913000643 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Mood improvement reduces memory complaints in depressed patients
Antikainen, R., Hänninen, T., Honkalampi, K., Hintikka, J., Koivumaa-Honkanen, H., Tanskanen, A., & Viinamäki, H. (2001) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s004060170060 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Analyzing dynamic data: A tutorial
Revelle, W., & Wilt, J. A. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.020 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Memory complaint and performance in normal and depressed older adults
Popkin, S. J., Gallagher, D., Thompson, L. W., & Moore, M. (1982) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/03610738208260271 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Cognitive deficits are associated with functional impairment in severely depressed patients
Vaughn McCall, W., & Dunn, A. G. (2003) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2003.09.003 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Kim, J., Lim, S., Min, Y. H., Shin, Y.-W., Lee, B., Sohn, G., Jung, K. H., Lee, J.-H., Son, B. H., Ahn, S. H., et al. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5598 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Bos, F. M., Schoevers, R. A., & aan het Rot, M. (2015) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.08.008 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Do goal-setting interventions improve the quality of goals in mental health services?
Clarke, S. P., Crowe, T. P., Oades, L. G., & Deane, F. P. (2009) · Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal · doi:10.2975/32.4.2009.292.299 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Shrier, L. A., Shih, M., & Beardslee, W. R. (2005) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2073 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Relationships Among Neurocognition, Symptoms, and Functioning in Treatment-Resistant Depression
Gupta, M., Holshausen, K., Best, M. W., Jokic, R., Milev, R., Bernard, T., Gou, L., & Bowie, C. R. (2013) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/act002 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Systematic review of neurocognition and occupational functioning in major depressive disorder
Evans, V. C., Chan, S. S., Iverson, G. L., Bond, D. J., Yatham, L. N., & Lam, R. W. (2013) · Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.2217/npy.13.3 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Performance of a computer‐based assessment of cognitive function measures in two cohorts of seniors
Espeland, M. A., Katula, J. A., Rushing, J., Kramer, A. F., Jennings, J. M., Sink, K. M., Nadkarni, N. K., Reid, K. F., Castro, C. M., Church, T., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.3949 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2013, DSM-5 Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benjamens, S., Dhunnoo, P., & Meskó, B. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00324-0 · Cited by 1,215 · see citing works
Parkinson’s Disease Management via Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review
Mughal, H., Javed, A. R., Rizwan, M., Almadhor, A. S., & Kryvinska, N. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3162844 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Current advances in wearable devices and their sensors in patients with depression
Lee, S., Kim, H., Park, M. J., & Jeon, H. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672347 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
From Treatment to Healing:Envisioning a Decolonial Digital Mental Health
Pendse, S. R., Nkemelu, D., Bidwell, N. J., Jadhav, S., Pathare, S., De Choudhury, M., & Kumar, N. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501982 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Digital health data-driven approaches to understand human behavior
Marsch, L. A. (2020) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-020-0761-5 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Jeng, M., Pai, F., & Yeh, T. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs12040114 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Weizenbaum, E. L., Torous, J. B., & Fulford, D. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/14328 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Zarate, D., Stavropoulos, V., Ball, M., Collier, G. D. S., & Jacobson, N. C. (2022) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-04013-y · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Hilty, D. M., Armstrong, C. M., Luxton, D. D., Gentry, M. T., & Krupinski, E. A. (2021) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-021-00199-2 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
The Apple Watch for Monitoring Mental Health–Related Physiological Symptoms: Literature Review
Lui, G. Y., Loughnane, D. C., Polley, C., Jayarathna, T., & Breen, P. P. (2022) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/37354 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Implementing Remote Memory Clinics to Enhance Clinical Care During and After COVID-19
Owens, A. P., Ballard, C. G., Beigi, M., Kalafatis, C., Brooker, H. J., Lavelle, G., Brønnick, K., Sauer, J., Boddington, S., Velayudhan, L., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.579934 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Engagement with mobile health interventions for depression: A systematic review
Molloy, A. G., & Anderson, P. L. (2021) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2021.100454 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Robles, Y. D. L. F., Ricoy-Cano, A. J., Albín-Rodríguez, A.-P., Ruiz, J. L. L., & Espinilla, M. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22228599 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Wearable devices for anxiety & depression: A scoping review
Ahmed, A., Aziz, S., Alzubaidi, M., Schneider, J., Irshaidat, S., Abu Serhan, H., Abd-alrazaq, A. A., Solaiman, B., & Househ, M. (2023) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update · doi:10.1016/j.cmpbup.2023.100095 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Evaluation, Acceptance, and Qualification of Digital Measures: From Proof of Concept to Endpoint
Goldsack, J. C., Dowling, A. V., Samuelson, D., Patrick‐Lake, B., & Clay, I. (2021) · Digital Biomarkers · doi:10.1159/000514730 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey on Wearable Computing for Mental and Physical Health Monitoring
Elfouly, T., & Alouani, A. T. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14173443 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Patient and physician perspectives of a smartphone application for depression: a qualitative study
Patoz, M.-C., Hidalgo‐Mazzei, D., Blanc, O., Verdolini, N., Pacchiarotti, I., Murru, A., Zukerwar, L., Vieta, E., Llorca, P., & Samalin, L. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03064-x · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Sverdlov, O., Curcic, J., Hannesdottir, K., Gou, L., De Luca, V., Ambrosetti, F., Zhang, B., Praestgaard, J., Vallejo, V., Dolman, A., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.640741 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationWearable Technologies for Healthy Ageing: Prospects, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations
Canali, S., Ferretti, A., Schiaffonati, V., & Blasimme, A. (2024) · The Journal of Frailty & Aging · doi:10.14283/jfa.2024.19 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Skin Sensing and Wearable Technology as Tools to Measure Atopic Dermatitis Severity
Khan, Y. W., Todorov, A. R., Torah, R. N., Beeby, S., & Ardern‐Jones, M. R. (2024) · Skin Health and Disease · doi:10.1002/ski2.449 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Ferrar, J., Griffith, G. J., Skirrow, C., Cashdollar, N. M., Taptiklis, N., Dobson, J., Cree, F., Cormack, F. K., Barnett, J. H., & Munafo, M. R. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26004 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationCurrent Status and Future Perspectives on the Internet of Things in Oncology
Muhsen, I. N., Rasheed, O. W., Habib, E., Alsaad, R., Maghrabi, M. K., Rahman, M. A., Sicker, D., Wood, W. A., Beg, M. S., Sung, A. D., et al. (2021) · Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.hemonc.2021.09.003 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Desenvolvimento de uma tecnologia digital de apoio à terapia cognitivo-comportamental
do Pinho, J. C. G., Ferreira, A., & Alves, A. G. (2023) · Revista Psicologia Diversidade e Saúde · doi:10.17267/2317-3394rpds.2023.e4511 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Goodday, S., Karlin, E., Alfarano, A., Brooks, A., Chapman, C., Desille, R., Rangwala, S., Karlin, D. R., Emami, H., Woods, N. F., et al. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/32165 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationAmin, R., Schreynemackers, S., Oppenheimer, H., Petrovic, M., Hegerl, U., & Reich, H. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/57418 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Goodday, S., Karlin, E., Brooks, A., Chapman, C., Karlin, D. R., Foschini, L., Kipping, E., Wildman, M., Francis, M. K., Greenman, H., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00579-9 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationNadal, C., Earley, C., Enrique, Á., Sas, C., Richards, D., & Doherty, G. J. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3617361 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Müller, L., Gossmann, K., Schmid, R., Rosner, R., & Unterhitzenberger, J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246069 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Yunusova, A., Lai, J., Rivera, A. P., Hu, S., Labbaf, S., Rahmani, A. M., Dutt, N. D., Jain, R., & Borelli, J. L. (2021) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/25775 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
The Path Forward for Digital Measures: Suppressing the Desire to Compare Apples and Pineapples
Houts, C. R., Patrick‐Lake, B., Clay, I., & Wirth, R. J. (2020) · Digital Biomarkers · doi:10.1159/000511586 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Digital phenotyping: how it could change mental health care and why we should all keep up
Jilka, S., & Giacco, D. (2024) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638237.2024.2395537 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Vignapiano, A., Monaco, F., Pagano, C., Piacente, M., Farina, F., Petrillo, G., Sica, R., Marenna, A., Shin, J. I., Solmi, M., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1321345 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Cohen, M. B.-D., Maeir, A., Eldar, E., & Nahum, M. (2023) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/10870547231153934 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Hafiz, P., Miskowiak, K. W., Maxhuni, A., Kessing, L. V., & Bardram, J. E. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3432219 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Taliaz, D., & Souery, D. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10143109 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Hafiz, P., & Bardram, J. E. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/17506 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Abrar, M., Rehman, M. U., Khalid, S., & Ullah, R. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-025-11447-9 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Cormack, F. K., McCue, M., Skirrow, C., Cashdollar, N. M., Taptiklis, N., van Schaik, T. A., Fehnert, B., King, J., Chrones, L., Sarkey, S., et al. (2023) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/46895 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent Advancements on Smartwatches and Smartbands in Healthcare
Cipriano, M., Costagliola, G., Rosa, M. D., Fuccella, V., & Shevchenko, S. (2021) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-3013-2_10 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Hampsey, E., Meszaros, M., Skirrow, C., Strawbridge, R., Taylor, R., Chok, L., Aarsland, D., Al-chalabi, A., Chaudhuri, R., Weston, J., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061193 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationData Contribution Summaries for Patient Engagement in Multi-Device Health Monitoring Research
Rainey, J., Verweij, D., Dodds, C. B., Graeber, J., Farhadi, F., Ali, R., Zhang, V., Bull, C., & Smeddinck, J. D. (2021) · ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) · doi:10.1145/3460418.3479371 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Bastardo, R., Pavão, J., Martins, A. I., Silva, A. G., & Rocha, N. P. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.097 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Digital biomarkers for brain health: passive and continuous assessment from wearable sensors
Matias, I., Haas, M., Daza, E. J., Kliegel, M., & Wac, K. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02340-y · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Jenciūtė, G., Kasputytė, G., Bunevičienė, I., Korobeinikova, E., Vaitiekus, D., Inčiūra, A., Jaruševičius, L., Bunevičius, R., Krikštolaitis, R., Krilavičius, T., et al. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/49096 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Alam, N. B., Haque, M. T., Subedar, S., Giacco, D., Singh, S. R. G., & Jilka, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2026.1772744 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Makhmutova, M., Kainkaryam, R., Ferreira, M., Min, J. S., Jaggi, M., & Clay, I. (2021) · doi:10.1145/3469266.3469878 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Diagnostic digital phenotyping in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a systematic review
Vecchio, I., Mifsud, L., Almeida, S. C. E., & Passecker, J. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02194-w · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Lauvsnes, A. D. F., Hansen, T. I., Ankill, S. Ø., Bae, S. W., Gråwe, R. W., Braund, T. A., Larsen, M. E., & Langaas, M. (2023) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/45254 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hafiz, P., Maxhuni, A., & Bardram, J. E. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi48887.2020.9374342 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Curcic, J., Vallejo, V., Sorinas, J., Sverdlov, O., Præstgaard, J., Piksa, M., Deurinck, M., Erdemli, G., Bügler, M., Tarnanas, I., et al. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/35442 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationGhadimi, S., Ereso, J., Kaula, A. J., Taptiklis, N., Cormack, F. K., Alessi, C., Martin, J. L., Dzierzewski, J. M., Naeim, A., Kremen, S. A., et al. (2025) · BMC Digital Health · doi:10.1186/s44247-025-00158-4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationMcCue, M., Khatib, R., Kabir, C., Blair, C., Fehnert, B., King, J., Spalding, A., Zaki, L. A. M., Chrones, L., Roy, A., et al. (2023) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/42768 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationBrearly, T. W., Elbich, D., Dhinojwala, M., & Hakun, J. G. (2025) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2025.2534720 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Shrier, L. A., Milliren, C. E., Ciriello, B., O’Connell, M., & Harris, S. K. (2025) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/70219 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cao, B., Xiao, M., Chen, X., Zhao, Y., Pan, Z., McIntyre, R. S., & Chen, H. (2021) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039488.2021.1965654 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Takeshige, M., Oka, T., Ohwan, M., & Hirai, K. (2024) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12565 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Teckchandani, T. A., Shields, R. E., Andrews, K. L., Nisbet, J., Afifi, T. O., Asmundson, G. J. G., Maguire, K. Q., Jamshidi, L., Neary, J. P., Krätzig, G. P., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy · doi:10.1007/s41811-025-00231-w · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lin, J., Zhang, L., Li, M., Li, J., Yin, L., Yan, G., Hou, X., Yin, H., & Xu, G. (2025) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116779 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Cheng, S., Chen, W., Chang, C., Chang, J. P., Chang, C., Hsu, J.-M., Lin, S., Mischoulon, D., Kishimoto, T., & Su, K.-P. (2026) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.70034 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Wearable Technology for Depression Assessment: A Scoping Review of Datasets
Tlachac, M., Elsbree, H. K., & Heinz, M. V. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2026.3704930
Bourla, A., Mouchabac, S., Ferreri, F., Berrouiguet, S., & Torous, J. B. (2026) · L Encéphale · doi:10.1016/j.encep.2026.08.005 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Goldsack, J. C., & Clay, I. (2021) · doi:10.1145/3469266.3470465 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Meskó, B., Benjamens, S., & Dhunnoo, P. (2020) · doi:10.2196/preprints.18882 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Goodday, S., Yang, R., Karlin, E., Tempero, J., Harry, C., Brooks, A., Behrouzi, T., Yu, J. S., Goldenberg, A., Francis, M., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.04.26.24306455 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Features of wearable devices used for Anxiety & Depression: A scoping review (Preprint)Preprint
Ahmed, A., Aziz, S., Alzubaidi, M. S., Schneider, J., Irshaidat, S., Serhan, H. A. A., Abd-Alrazaq, A. A., Solaiman, B., & Househ, M. S. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.33287
Lui, G. Y., Loughnane, D. C., Polley, C., Jayarathna, T., & Breen, P. P. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.37354
Keere, I. V. D., Vandebelt, K., Angelopoulos, C., Blocker, A., Carvajal, R., Dowling, A. V., Drummond, D., Fanarjian, M., Iyer, S. V., Lagally, M., et al. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.37443
Ianovici, C., Purcărea, V. L., Gheorghe, I.-R., & Blidaru, A. (2023) · Journal of Medicine and Life · doi:10.25122/jml-2023-0198
Shrier, L. A., Milliren, C. E., Ciriello, B., O’Connell, M., & Harris, S. K. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.70219
Amalakanti, S., Avula, V. C. R., & Jillella, J. P. (2025) · Archives of Mental Health · doi:10.4103/amh.amh_35_25
Developing a psychological test battery to measure cognition in daily life
Aschenbrenner, A. J., Xi, M., Cohn, J., Simon, D. A., & Jackson, J. J. (2026) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-026-03128-4
Zarate, D., Stavropoulos, V., Ball, M., de Sena Collier, G., & Jacobson, N. C. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20131117
Zarate, D., Stavropoulos, V., Ball, M., de Sena Collier, G., & Jacobson, N. C. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20131114
Kwak, J. S., Lee, H., Jo, S., Kwon, J. H., Kwon, S. J., Kim, Y., & Lee, H. (2026) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/88223
Sinvani, R.-T., Auerbach-Lawee, B., Marom, S., Goldstein, G., Nahum, M., & Gilboa, Y. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10679471/v1
Pick, S., & Hotopf, M. H. (2026) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0471
PSICOTERAPIA DIGITAL: APLICAÇÕES COM IA NA IMPLEMENTAÇÃO DA TERAPIA COGNITIVO-COMPORTAMENTAL
Martins, M. F. M., Andrade, V. A., Machado, A. C., da Silva, M. C. H., Machado, R. I. D. S., dos Reis, I. V. S., & Marques, J. (2026) · Revista Master Ensino Pesquisa e Extensão · doi:10.47224/revistamaster.v10i20.785
The inhibitory control epidemic: A new framework for chronic disease prevention
Bigliassi, M., & Antonio, D. S. (2026) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101305
Yang, Y., Ihara, K., Garrido, F. A. S., Hirata, K., Jiang, T., Lan, H., Wu, H., Yu, H., Tamada, Y., Murashita, K., et al. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26196093
- Authors
- Cormack, F., McCue, M., Taptiklis, N., Skirrow, C., Glazer, E., Panagopoulos, E., van Schaik, T. A., Fehnert, B., King, J., & Barnett, J. H.
- Affiliations
- Cambridge Cognition (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Takeda (United States) (US)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cormack, Francesca
- ORCID
- Venue
- JMIR Mental Health
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2019-11-18
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e12814
- ISSN
- 2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6887827
- OpenAlex
- W2965472879
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 11.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, wearable devices, Apple Watch, mood assessment, n-back task, cognitive symptoms of depression, antidepressant response, medication adherence, validity and feasibility, mental health apps, mild to moderate depression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review