Cited by 18Indigenous Peoples' Rights and LawEnvironmental law and policyIndigenous Studies and Ecology

Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling and the Right to Practice and Revitalize Cultural Traditions and Customs

Firestone, Jeremy, Lilley, Jonathan·2005·Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy

Abstract

* An earlier version of this article appears as Jeremy Firestone & Jonathan Lilley, An Endangered Species: Aboriginal Whaling and the Right to Self-Determination and Cultural Heritage in a National...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13880290590965339

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Firestone, J., & Lilley, J.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Venue
Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy
Published
2005-04
Volume
8
Issue
2-3
Pages
177-219
ISSN
  • 1388-0292 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1476
OpenAlex
W2093918969
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Keywords
cultural heritage, self-determination (international law), indigenous rights, threatened species, whaling regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review