Cited by 33Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Convergent validity and stability of secure base script knowledge from young adulthood to midlife

Open access
Waters, Theodore E. A., Facompré, Christopher R., Dagan, Or, Martin, Jodi, Johnson, William F., Young, Ethan S., Shankman, Jessica, Lee, Yoojin +2 more·2021·Attachment & Human Development

Abstract

Attachment theory posits that early experiences with caregivers are made portable across development in the form of mental representations of attachment experiences. These representations, the secure base script included, are thought to be stable across time. Here, we present data from two studies. Study 1 (N = 141) examined the degree of empirical convergence between the two major measures of secure base script knowledge in Study 2, we examined stability of secure base script knowledge from late adolescence to midlife combining data from both a high- and normative-risk cohort (N = 113). Study 1 revealed evidence for convergent validity (r = .50) and Study 2 revealed moderate rank-order stability (r = .43), which was not moderated by cohort risk status. Results support the validity of secure base script knowledge assessments and prediction that attachment representations show moderate stability across early adulthood and into midlife.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616734.2020.1832548

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waters, T. E. A., Facompré, C. R., Dagan, O., Martin, J., Johnson, W. F., Young, E. S., Shankman, J., Lee, Y., Simpson, J. A., & Roisman, G. I.
Affiliations
  • New York University Abu Dhabi (AE)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • York University (CA)
  • Widener University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Maine (US)
Corresponding author
Waters, Theodore E. A.
Venue
Attachment & Human Development
Published
2020-10-12
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
740-760
ISSN
  • 1461-6734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2988
OpenAlex
W3092200832
Cited by
33
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Attachment & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG039453)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F32 HD078250)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
secure base script, attachment representations, convergent validity, rank-order stability, attachment theory, secure base, high-risk cohort, early adulthood, midlife, late adolescence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Object Attachment, Caregivers, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review