Cited by 31Smoking Behavior and CessationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Carry-over effects of smoking cue exposure on working memory performance

Open access
Wilson, Stephen J., Sayette, Michael A., Fiez, Julie A., Brough, Elizabeth·2007·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of drug cue exposure on working memory performance in cigarette smokers. Adult smokers (N = 23) deprived for 12 hr performed a working memory task during which they were exposed to three types of task-irrelevant stimuli: Pictures containing smoking related-content, pictures devoid of smoking content, and a fixation cross. Consistent with prior research, we found that drug cue exposure affected the processing of subsequent items (i.e., carry-over effects). Specifically, we found that working memory performance was worse on trials containing neutral pictures preceded by trials containing smoking cues compared with performance on trials containing neutral pictures preceded by trials not containing smoking-related stimuli. Previously observed effects of smoking cue exposure on cognitive processing were replicated but only after removing trials subject to carry-over effects. These results replicate and extend previous research demonstrating similar effects and highlight the significant methodological and conceptual implications of carry-over effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14622200701243144

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perturbation of cognitive control is a hallmark of addiction.

    “converging evidence that perturbation of cognitive control is a hallmark of addiction (Ersche et al., 2005; Garavan and Stout, 2005; Wilson et al., 2007).”

    From Impulsivity, frontal lobes and risk for addiction (2009) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, S. J., Sayette, M. A., Fiez, J. A., & Brough, E.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Stephen J.
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2007-05
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
613-619
ISSN
1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164043286
Cited by
31
References
31
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Ford Foundation
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA10605, DA14103, R01DA014103, R01DA010605)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA159463)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
working memory, residual effects, cigarette smokers, nicotine, cognitive processes
MeSH terms
Arousal, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reinforcement, Psychology, Smoking, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review